Re: [Gluster-users] State of the gluster project

2023-10-28 Thread Strahil Nikolov
Well, After IBM acquisition, RH discontinued their support in many projects including  GlusterFS (certification exams were removed, payed product went EOL, etc). The only way to get it back on track is with a sponsor company that haves the capability to drive it.Kadalu is relying on GlusterFS but

Re: [Gluster-users] [EXT] Re: [Glusterusers] State of the gluster project

2023-10-28 Thread wk
On 10/28/23 1:30 PM, Alexander Schreiber wrote: Which is shame because I choose GlusterFS for one of my storage clusters _specifically_ due to the ease of emergency data recovery (for purely replicated volumes) even in case of complete failure of the software stack and system disks - just grab

Re: [Gluster-users] State of the gluster project

2023-10-28 Thread Zakhar Kirpichenko
I don't think it's worth it for anyone. It's a dead project since about 9.0, if not earlier. It's time to embrace the truth and move on. /Z On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 at 11:21, Strahil Nikolov wrote: > Well, > > After IBM acquisition, RH discontinued their support in many projects > including

Re: [Gluster-users] State of the gluster project

2023-10-28 Thread Alexander Schreiber
On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 11:07:52PM +0300, Zakhar Kirpichenko wrote: > I don't think it's worth it for anyone. It's a dead project since about > 9.0, if not earlier. It's time to embrace the truth and move on. Which is shame because I choose GlusterFS for one of my storage clusters _specifically_