ov
>
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 10:13, Zakhar Kirpichenko
> wrote:
> ---
>
> Community Meeting Calendar:
> Schedule -
> Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
> Bridge: https://meet.google.com/cpu-eiue-hvk
>
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> gluster
rom 10.x onwards seems more in line with what RedHat/IBM did to
CentOS rather than with any kind of CentOS 7 updates.
/Z
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 9:38 AM Eliyahu Rosenberg
wrote:
> Maintenance updates != new feature releases (and never has).
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 2:14 PM Zakhar
Hi,
Any news about this? I provided very detailed test results and proof of the
issue https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/3206 on 6 February 2022
but haven't heard back after that.
Best regards,
Zakhar
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 7:14 AM Zakhar Kirpichenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'v
Strahil Nikolov
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 9:57, Zakhar Kirpichenko
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Community Meeting Calendar:
>
> Schedule -
> Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
> Bridge: https://meet.google.com/cpu-eiue-hvk
> Gluster-
Hi!
I opened a Github issue https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/3206
but not sure how much attention they get there, so re-posting here just in
case someone has any ideas.
Description of problem:
GlusterFS 9.5, 3-node cluster (2 bricks + arbiter), an attempt to tar the
whole filesystem
An interesting decision not to support GlusterFS 10.x on CentOS 7, which
I'm sure is in use by many and will be supported with maintenance updates
for another 2 years.
/Z
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 12:16 PM Shwetha Acharya
wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> Please refer to [1]
> As per community guidelines,
tar ?
> For statedump generation , you can follow
> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/1440#issuecomment-674051243 .
>
> Best Regards,
> Strahil Nikolov
>
>
> В събота, 5 февруари 2022 г., 07:54:22 Гринуич+2, Zakhar Kirpichenko <
> zak...@gmail.com> написа:
>
&g
Hi,
Red Hat Gluster Storage is EOL, Red Hat moved Gluster devs to other
projects, so Gluster doesn't get much attention. From my experience, it has
deteriorated since about version 9.0, and we're migrating to alternatives.
/Z
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 10:29, Marcus Pedersén
wrote:
> Hi all,
> I
I don't think it's worth it for anyone. It's a dead project since about
9.0, if not earlier. It's time to embrace the truth and move on.
/Z
On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 at 11:21, Strahil Nikolov wrote:
> Well,
>
> After IBM acquisition, RH discontinued their support in many projects
> including
