Re: [Gluster-users] Disabling read-ahead and io-cache for native fuse mounts

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:51 AM Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 5:38 PM Raghavendra Gowdappa > wrote: > >> All, >> >> We've found perf xlators io-cache and read-ahead not adding any >> performance improvement. At best read-ahead is redundant due to kernel >>

Re: [Gluster-users] [ovirt-users] GlusterFS performance with only one drive per host?

Do you feel that SSDs are worth the extra cost or am I better off using > regular HDDs? I'm looking for the best performance I can get with glusterFS > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 12:03 AM, Manoj Pillai <mpil...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 a

Re: [Gluster-users] [ovirt-users] GlusterFS performance with only one drive per host?

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:31 PM, Sahina Bose wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 5:57 PM, Jayme wrote: > >> I'm spec'ing a new oVirt build using three Dell R720's w/ 256GB. I'm >> considering storage options. I don't have a requirement for high amounts >>

Re: [Gluster-users] gluster for home directories?

Hi Rik, Nice clarity and detail in the description. Thanks! inline... On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:29 PM, Rik Theys wrote: > Hi, > > We are looking into replacing our current storage solution and are > evaluating gluster for this purpose. Our current solution uses a

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] CFP for Gluster Developer Summit

Here's a proposal ... Title: State of Gluster Performance Theme: Stability and Performance I hope to achieve the following in this talk: * present a brief overview of current performance for the broad workload classes: large-file sequential and random workloads, small-file and