[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 6.1

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 6.1 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. Major changes, features and limitations addressed in this release: None Thanks, Gluster community [1] Packages for 6.1:

Re: [Gluster-users] v6.0 release notes fix request

Thanks for reporting, this is fixed now. On 4/19/19 2:57 AM, Artem Russakovskii wrote: > Hi, > > https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/release-notes/6.0/ currently contains > a list of fixed bugs that's run-on and should be fixed with proper line > breaks: > image.png > > Sincerely, > Artem > > --

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 5.6

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 5.6 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. Major changes, features and limitations addressed in this release: - Release 5.x had a long standing issue where network bandwidth usage was

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 4.1.8

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 4.1.8 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. Major changes, features and limitations addressed in this release: None Thanks, Gluster community [1] Packages for 4.1.8:

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster Release 6

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of 6.0, our latest release. This is a major release that includes a range of code improvements and stability fixes along with a few features as noted below. A selection of the key features and bugs addressed are documented in this [1]

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 5.5

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 5.5 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [3]. Major changes, features and limitations addressed in this release: - Release 5.4 introduced an incompatible change that prevented rolling

[Gluster-users] Release 6: Tagged and ready for packaging

Hi, RC1 testing is complete and blockers have been addressed. The release is now tagged for a final round of packaging and package testing before release. Thanks for testing out the RC builds and reporting issues that needed to be addressed. As packaging and final package testing is finishing

Re: [Gluster-users] Upgrade 5.3 -> 5.4 on debian: public IP is used instead of LAN IP

We created a 5.5 release tag, and it is under packaging now. It should be packaged and ready for testing early next week and should be released close to mid-week next week. Thanks, Shyam On 3/13/19 12:34 PM, Artem Russakovskii wrote: > Wednesday now with no update :-/ > > Sincerely, > Artem > >

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 6: Release date update

On 3/5/19 1:17 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Hi, > > Release-6 was to be an early March release, and due to finding bugs > while performing upgrade testing, is now expected in the week of 18th > March, 2019. > > RC1 builds are expected this week, to contain the required fix

Re: [Gluster-users] Release 6: Release date update

wrote: > I just found a fix for > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674412. Since its a > deadlock I am wondering whether this should be in 6.0. What do you think? > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 11:47 PM Shyam Ranganathan <mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: > &

[Gluster-users] Release 6: Release date update

Hi, Release-6 was to be an early March release, and due to finding bugs while performing upgrade testing, is now expected in the week of 18th March, 2019. RC1 builds are expected this week, to contain the required fixes, next week would be testing our RC1 for release fitness before the release.

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] GlusterFS - 6.0RC - Test days (27th, 28th Feb)

On 3/4/19 10:08 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 at 20:33, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan > mailto:atumb...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Thanks to those who participated. > > Update at present: > > We found 3 blocker bugs in upgrade scenarios, and hence have marked >

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-6.0rc0 released

Hi, Release-6 RC0 packages are built (see mail below). This is a good time to start testing the release bits, and reporting any issues on bugzilla. Do post on the lists any testing done and feedback from the same. We have about 2 weeks to GA of release-6 barring any major blockers uncovered

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 5.3 and 4.1.7

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 4.1.7 and 5.3 (packages available at [1] & [2]). Release notes for the release can be found at [3] & [4]. Major changes, features and limitations addressed in this release: - This release fixes several security vulnerabilities

Re: [Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 5.2

On 12/13/18 2:13 PM, Lindolfo Meira wrote: > Links for OpenSUSE Leap packages never work :/ I assume you are trying the link at [3] IOW, http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/glusterfs:/Leap15-5/openSUSE_Leap_15/ That did not take me anywhere as well, but on backtracking the right

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 5.2

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 5.2 (packages available at [1]). Release notes can be found at [2]. Major changes, features and limitations addressed in this release: - Several bugs as listed in the release notes have been addressed Thanks, Gluster community

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 4.1.6 and 5.1

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 4.0.1 and 5.1 (packages available at [1] & [2]). Release notes for the release can be found at [3] & [4]. Major changes, features and limitations addressed in this release: - This release fixes several security vulnerabilities

Re: [Gluster-users] Corresponding op-version for each release?

On 11/26/2018 02:07 PM, Gambit15 wrote: > Hey, >  The op-version for each release doesn't seem to be documented anywhere, > not even in the release notes. Does anyone know where this information > can be found? No, there is no table in the upstream docs. I have opened an issue [1] to get the same

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Consolidating Feature Requests in github

On 11/05/2018 08:29 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > Hi All, > > I am triaging the open RFEs in bugzilla [1]. Since our new(er) workflow > involves managing RFEs as github issues, I am considering migrating > relevant open RFEs from bugzilla to github. Once migrated, a RFE in > bugzilla would be closed

Re: [Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster Release 5

/announce/2018-July/000103.html > > > 23.10.2018 17:47, Shyam Ranganathan пишет: >> The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of 5.0, our >> latest release. >> >> This is a major release that includes a range of code improvements and >> sta

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster Release 5

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of 5.0, our latest release. This is a major release that includes a range of code improvements and stability fixes with some management and standalone features as noted below. A selection of the key features and changes are documented on

Re: [Gluster-users] Announcing Glusterfs release 3.12.15 (Long Term Maintenance)

On 10/17/2018 12:21 AM, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: > #1637989 : data-self-heal in > arbiter volume results in stale locks. > > > Could you tell me, please, when 4.1 with fix will be released? Tagging the release is on the 20th of the month [1], packages should

Re: [Gluster-users] Announcing Glusterfs release 3.12.15 (Long Term Maintenance)

On 10/17/2018 07:08 AM, Paolo Margara wrote: > Hi, > > this release will be the last of the 3.12.x branch prior it reach the EOL? Yes that is true, this would be the last minor release, as release-5 comes out. > > > Greetings, > >     Paolo > > Il 16/10/18 17:41, Jiffin Tony Thottan ha

[Gluster-users] GlusterFS Project Update - Week 1&2 of Oct

This is a once in 2 weeks update on activities around glusterfs project [1]. This is intended to provide the community with updates on progress around key initiatives and also to reiterate current goals that the project is working towards. This is intended to help contributors to pick and address

[Gluster-users] Maintainer meeting minutes : 15th Oct, 2018

### BJ Link * Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/217609845 * Watch: ### Attendance * Nigel, Nithya, Deepshikha, Akarsha, Kaleb, Shyam, Sunny ### Agenda * AI from previous meeting: - Glusto-Test completion on release-5 branch - On Glusto team - Vijay will take this on. - He will be

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 4.1.5 (Long Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 4.1.5 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. Major changes, features and limitations addressed in this release: - Release 4.1.0 notes incorrectly reported that all python code in Gluster

Re: [Gluster-users] Upgrade from 3.13 ?

tter part of the question, with the former around 3.13 missing in reference. I do not have enough Ubuntu fu to answer that one, so leaving that out for now. > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 9:16 AM Shyam Ranganathan <mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > On 09/12/2018 04

Re: [Gluster-users] Upgrade from 3.13 ?

On 09/12/2018 04:05 PM, Nicolas SCHREVEL wrote: > But there is no info about 3.13 :  > https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Upgrade-Guide/upgrade_to_4.1/ > > "Upgrade procedure to Gluster 4.1, from Gluster 4.0.x, 3.12.x, and 3.10.x > >     NOTE: Upgrade procedure remains the same as with 3.12 and

Re: [Gluster-users] Bug with hardlink limitation in 3.12.13 ?

On 08/31/2018 01:06 PM, Reiner Keller wrote: > Hello, > > Am 31.08.2018 um 13:59 schrieb Shyam Ranganathan: >> I suspect you have hit this: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1602262#c5 >> >> I further suspect your older setup

Re: [Gluster-users] Bug with hardlink limitation in 3.12.13 ?

On 08/31/2018 07:15 AM, Reiner Keller wrote: > Hello, > > I got yesterday unexpected error "No space left on device" on my new > gluster volume caused by too many hardlinks. > This happened while I done "rsync --aAHXxv ..." replication from old > gluster to new gluster servers - each running

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 4.1.3 (Long Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 4.1.3 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. Major changes, features and limitations addressed in this release: - Bug #1601356 titled "Problem with SSL/TLS encryption", is not yet fixed

Re: [Gluster-users] 4.1.3?

On 08/23/2018 07:18 PM, wkmail wrote: > Weren't we supposed to get a new 4.1.x  this month on the 20th? Yes, most of the tagging preparation is done, it was staggered considering 3.12 release delays (Note to self: should let the lists know) > > In particular I am interested in the client

Re: [Gluster-users] Possibly missing two steps in upgrade to 4.1 guide

On 08/21/2018 09:33 AM, mabi wrote: > Hello, > > I just upgraded from 4.0.2 to 4.1.2 using the official documentation: > > https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Upgrade-Guide/upgrade_to_4.1/ > > I noticed that this documentation might be missing the following two > additional steps: > > 1)

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 4.1.2 (Long Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 4.0.1 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. Major changes, features and limitations addressed in this release: - Release 4.1.0 notes incorrectly reported that all python code in Gluster

[Gluster-users] Gluster Release cadence and version changes

This announcement is to publish changes to the upstream release cadence from quarterly (every 3 months), to every 4 months and to have all releases maintained (no more LTM/STM releases), based on the maintenance and EOL schedules for the same. Further, it is to start numbering releases with just

[Gluster-users] Announcing GlusterFS release 4.1.0 (Long Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of 4.1, our latest long term supported release. This is a major release that includes a range of features enhancing management, performance, monitoring, and providing newer functionality like thin arbiters, cloud archival, time consistency.

[Gluster-users] Release delays!

Hi, Gluster 4.1 release has been delayed due to regressions in the brick multiplexing feature. Hence, instead of early June when 4.1 was to release, it would be released by mid-June. In preparation for 4.1, releases 4.0 and 3.10 would be EOL'd, as a result their expected update releases in the

[Gluster-users] Gluster release 3.12.10 (Long Term Maintenance) Canceled for 10th of May, 2018

, 2018. Thanks, Shyam On 04/30/2018 12:56 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster > 3.12.9 (packages available at [1]). > > Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. > > This release contains fixes for CVE-2018-1088

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 4.0.2 (Short Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 4.0.2 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. This release contains fixes for CVE-2018-1088 and CVE-2018-1112, among other fixes. Please use the release notes to check on the fix list.

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 3.12.9 (Long Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.12.9 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. This release contains fixes for CVE-2018-1088 and CVE-2018-1112, among other fixes. Please use the release notes to check on the fix list.

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 3.10.12 (Long Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.10.12 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. This release contains fixes for CVE-2018-1088 and CVE-2018-1112, among other fixes. Please use the release notes to check on the fix list.

Re: [Gluster-users] ETA for 3.10.12 (was "Planned for the 30th of Mar, 2018")

On 04/12/2018 06:49 AM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani wrote: > On 09/04/2018 21:36, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> On 04/09/2018 04:48 AM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani wrote: >>> On 06/04/2018 19:33, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> We postponed thi

Re: [Gluster-users] ETA for 3.10.12 (was "Planned for the 30th of Mar, 2018")

On 04/09/2018 04:48 AM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani wrote: > On 06/04/2018 19:33, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We postponed this and I did not announce this to the lists. The number >> of bugs fixed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to

Re: [Gluster-users] ETA for 3.10.12 (was "Planned for the 30th of Mar, 2018")

Hi, We postponed this and I did not announce this to the lists. The number of bugs fixed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to the 30th of Apr instead. Is there a specific fix that you are looking for in the release? Thanks, Shyam On 04/06/2018 11:47 AM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 4.0.0 (Short Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community celebrates 13 years of development with this latest release, Gluster 4.0. This release enables improved integration with containers, an enhanced user experience, and a next-generation management framework. The 4.0 release helps cloud-native app developers choose Gluster as

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 3.10.11 (Long Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.10.11 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. Thanks, Gluster community [1] Packages: https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.10/3.10.11/ [2] Release notes:

Re: [Gluster-users] Fwd: Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-4.0.0 released

On 03/08/2018 06:17 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Forwarding to the devel and users groups as well. > > We have tagged 4.0.0 branch as GA, and are in the process of building > packages. > > It would a good time to run final install/upgrade tests if you get a > chance on

[Gluster-users] Fwd: Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-4.0.0 released

Forwarding to the devel and users groups as well. We have tagged 4.0.0 branch as GA, and are in the process of building packages. It would a good time to run final install/upgrade tests if you get a chance on these packages (I am running off to do the same now). Thanks, Shyam

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.0: RC1 tagged

On 03/05/2018 09:05 AM, Javier Romero wrote: >> I am about halfway through my own upgrade testing (using centOS7 >> containers), and it is patterned around this [1], in case that helps. > Taking a look at this. > > Thanks for confirming the install of the bits. On the upgrade front, I did

[Gluster-users] Release 4.0: GA tagging status and blockers

Hi, Here are the list of patches that we are waiting on before tagging GA for Gluster 4.0. (packages and release announcement comes in about 2-5 days post this). We hope to be ready to tag the release on Monday 5th March, and will keep the list posted on a daily basis on any slips. 1) Patches

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.0: RC1 tagged

On 02/28/2018 07:25 AM, Javier Romero wrote: > This one fails > http://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/1548/311548/centos-release-gluster40-0.9-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm > > # yum install -y >

[Gluster-users] Release 4.0: RC1 tagged

Hi, RC1 is tagged in the code, and the request for packaging the same is on its way. We should have packages as early as today, and request the community to test the same and return some feedback. We have about 3-4 days (till Thursday) for any pending fixes and the final release to happen, so

[Gluster-users] Release 4.0: RC0 packages

Hi, We have tagged and created RC0 packages for the 4.0 release of Gluster. Details of the packages are given below. We request community feedback from the RC stages, so that the end release can be better, towards this please test and direct any feedback to the lists for us to take a look at.

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 3.10.10 (Long Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.10.10 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. The corruption issue when sharded volumes are rebalanced, is fixed with this release. Thanks, Gluster community [1] Packages:

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 3.13.2 (Short Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.13.2 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. * FIXED: Expanding a gluster volume that is sharded may cause file corruption Thanks, Gluster community [1] Packages:

[Gluster-users] Community NetBSD regression tests EOL'd

Gluster Users, Gluster community is deprecating running regression tests for every commit on NetBSD, and in the future continue only build sanity (and handling any build breakages) on FreeBSD. We lack contributors that can help us keep the *BSD infrastructure and functionality up to date and

[Gluster-users] IMP: Release 4.0: CentOS 6 packages will not be made available

Gluster Users, This is to inform you that from the 4.0 release onward, packages for CentOS 6 will not be built by the gluster community. This also means that the CentOS SIG will not receive updates for 4.0 gluster packages. Gluster release 3.12 and its predecessors will receive CentOS 6 updates

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 3.10.9 (Long Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.10.9 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. We are still working on a further fix for the corruption issue when sharded volumes are rebalanced, details as below. * Expanding a gluster

Re: [Gluster-users] So how badly will Gluster be affected by the Intel 'fix'

On 01/04/2018 12:58 PM, WK wrote: > I'm reading that the new kernel will slow down context switches. That is > of course a big deal with FUSE mounts. > > Has anybody installed the new kernels yet and observed any performance > degradation? We are in the process of testing the same out. Hopefully

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] 2018 - Plans and Expectations on Gluster Community

On 01/03/2018 08:05 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 01/02/2018 11:03 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> ...     The people who were writing storhaug never finished it. Keep >> using >>     3.10 until storhaug gets finished. >> >> >> >> Since 3.10 will be EOL in approximately 2 months from now, what

Re: [Gluster-users] Syntax for creating arbiter volumes in gluster 4.0

On 12/20/2017 05:14 AM, Ravishankar N wrote: > Hi, > > The existing syntax in the gluster CLI for creating arbiter volumes is > `gluster volume create replica 3 arbiter 1 ` . > It means (or at least intended to mean) that out of the 3 bricks, 1 > brick is the arbiter. > There has been some

Re: [Gluster-users] Upgrading from Gluster 3.8 to 3.12

On 12/20/2017 01:01 AM, Hari Gowtham wrote: > Yes Atin. I'll take a look. Once we have a root cause and a way around, please document this in the upgrade procedure in our docs as well. That way future problems have a documented solution (outside of the lists as well). Thanks! > > On Wed, Dec

[Gluster-users] Announcing GlusterFS release 3.13.0 (Short Term Maintenance)

This is a major release that includes a range of features enhancing usability; enhancements to GFAPI for developers and a set of bug fixes. * Addition of summary option to the heal info CLI * Addition of checks for allowing lookups in AFR and removal of 'cluster.quorum-reads' volume option

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 3.10.8 (Long Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.10.8 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. We are still working on a further fix for the corruption issue when sharded volumes are rebalanced, details as below. * Expanding a

[Gluster-users] RIO scope in release 4.0 (Was: Request for Comments: Upgrades from 3.x to 4.0+)

On 11/02/2017 08:10 AM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar wrote: Hi Amudhan, Please go through the following that would clarify up-gradation concerns from DHT to RIO in 4.0 1. RIO would not deprecate DHT. Both DHT and RIO would co-exist. 2. DHT volumes would not be migrated to RIO. DHT volumes

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 3.10.7 (Long Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.10.7 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. We are still working on a further fix for the corruption issue when sharded volumes are rebalanced, details as below. * Expanding a

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] BoF - Gluster for VM store use case

On 10/31/2017 08:36 PM, Ben Turner wrote: * Erasure coded volumes with sharding - seen as a good fit for VM disk storage I am working on this with a customer, we have been able to do 400-500 MB / sec writes! Normally things max out at ~150-250. The trick is to use multiple files, create the

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.12.2 : Scheduled for the 10th of October

On 10/12/2017 08:09 AM, Jiffin Tony Thottan wrote: [2] : https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18489/ [1] : https://review.gluster.org/18506 Hi, Both issues looks like a regression. Master patch [2] got merged in master but [1] is still pending. @Rafi :

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 3.10.6 (Long Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.10.6 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. We are still working on a further fix for the corruption issue when sharded volumes are rebalanced, details as below. * Expanding a

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterd not working with systemd in redhat 7

On 10/04/2017 06:17 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 09:44:44AM +, ismael mondiu wrote: Hello, I'd like to test if 3.10.6 version fixes the problem . I'm wondering which is the correct way to upgrade from 3.10.5 to 3.10.6. It's hard to find upgrade guides for a minor

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.10.5 vs 3.12.0 huge performance loss

*1024) = 892MB/sec Shyam On 09/07/2017 12:07 AM, Serkan Çoban wrote: It is sequential write with file size 2GB. Same behavior observed with 3.11.3 too. On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Shyam Ranganathan <srang...@redhat.com> wrote: On 09/06/2017 05:48 AM, Serkan Çoban wrote: Hi, Just d

Re: [Gluster-users] Can I use 3.7.11 server with 3.10.5 client?

On 09/08/2017 01:32 PM, Serkan Çoban wrote: Any suggestions? On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Serkan Çoban wrote: Hi, Is it safe to use 3.10.5 client with 3.7.11 server with read-only data move operation? The normal upgrade, and hence tested, procedure is older

Re: [Gluster-users] Announcing GlusterFS release 3.12.0 (Long Term Maintenance)

at ways to improve that in the future. [1] https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/6/storage/x86_64/gluster-3.12/ On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 8:11 PM, Shyam Ranganathan <srang...@redhat.com> wrote: This is a major Gluster release that includes, features and bug fixes. Notable feature high

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.10.5 vs 3.12.0 huge performance loss

On 09/06/2017 05:48 AM, Serkan Çoban wrote: Hi, Just do some ingestion tests to 40 node 16+4EC 19PB single volume. 100 clients are writing each has 5 threads total 500 threads. With 3.10.5 each server has 800MB/s network traffic, cluster total is 32GB/s With 3.12.0 each server has 200MB/s

[Gluster-users] Announcing GlusterFS release 3.12.0 (Long Term Maintenance)

This is a major Gluster release that includes, features and bug fixes. Notable feature highlights are, * Ability to mount sub-directories using the Gluster native protocol (FUSE) * Brick multiplexing enhancements that help scale to larger brick counts per node * Enhancements

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Gluster documentation search

On 08/28/2017 07:14 AM, Nigel Babu wrote: Hello folks, I spend some time today mucking about trying to figure out how to make our documentation search a better experience. The short answer is, search kind of works now. Awesome! thank you. Long answer: mkdocs creates a client side file

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.8 Upgrade to 3.10

On 08/25/2017 09:17 AM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: Currently running 3.8.12, planning to rolling upgrade it to 3.8.15 this weekend. * debian 8 * 3 nodes * Replica 3 * Sharded * VM Hosting only The release notes strongly recommend upgrading to 3.10 * Is there any downside to staying

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 3.11.3 (Short Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.11.3 (packages available at [1,2,3]). Release notes for the release can be found at [4]. ***Reminder Number One***: 3.11.3 is the last release of the 3.11 STM series. 3.11 will be EOL when 3.12 is released in a couple of

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 3.10.5 (Long Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.10.5 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. We are still awaiting feedback on a major issue that is reported in the release-notes as follows, all known issues resulting in this

[Gluster-users] Release 3.12: RC0 build is available for testing!

Hi, 3.12 release has been tagged RC0 and the builds are available here [1] (signed with [2]). 3.12 comes with a set of new features as listed in the release notes [3]. We welcome any testing feedback on the release. If you find bugs, we request a bug report for the same at [4]. If it is

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 3.11.2 (Short Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.11.2 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. We still carry a major issue that is reported in the release-notes as follows, - Expanding a gluster volume that is sharded may cause