[Gluster-users] Expected performance for WORM scenario

2018-03-12 Thread Andreas Ericsson
Heya fellas. I've been struggling quite a lot to get glusterfs to perform even halfdecently with a write-intensive workload. Testnumbers are from gluster 3.10.7. We store a bunch of small files in a doubly-tiered sha1 hash fanout directory structure. The directories themselves aren't overly

Re: [Gluster-users] Expected performance for WORM scenario

2018-03-12 Thread Ondrej Valousek
Hi, Gluster will never perform well for small files. I believe there is nothing you can do with this. Ondrej From: gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org] On Behalf Of Andreas Ericsson Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 1:47 PM To: Gluster-users@gluster.org

[Gluster-users] Can't heal a volume: "Please check if all brick processes are running."

2018-03-12 Thread Anatoliy Dmytriyev
Hello, We have a very fresh gluster 3.10.10 installation. Our volume is created as distributed volume, 9 bricks 96TB in total (87TB after 10% of gluster disk space reservation) For some reasons I can’t “heal” the volume: # gluster volume heal gv0 Launching heal operation to perform index self

Re: [Gluster-users] Expected performance for WORM scenario

2018-03-12 Thread Nithya Balachandran
Hi, Can you send us the following details: 1. gluster volume info 2. What client you are using to run this? Thanks, Nithya On 12 March 2018 at 18:16, Andreas Ericsson wrote: > Heya fellas. > > I've been struggling quite a lot to get glusterfs to perform even >

[Gluster-users] trashcan on dist. repl. volume with geo-replication

2018-03-12 Thread Dietmar Putz
Hello, in regard to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434066 i have been faced to another issue when using the trashcan feature on a dist. repl. volume running a geo-replication. (gfs 3.12.6 on ubuntu 16.04.4) for e.g. removing an entire directory with subfolders :

Re: [Gluster-users] trashcan on dist. repl. volume with geo-replication

2018-03-12 Thread Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar
Hi Dietmar, I am trying to understand the problem and have few questions. 1. Is trashcan enabled only on master volume? 2. Does the 'rm -rf' done on master volume synced to slave ? 3. If trashcan is disabled, the issue goes away? The geo-rep error just says the it failed to create the directory