Re: [Gluster-users] Question about trusted.afr

Hey Tamal, Sorry for the delay. See my comments inline. On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Tamal Saha wrote: > Hi, > I am running a GlusterFS cluster in Kubernetes. This has a single 1x2 > volume. I am dealing with a split-brain sitution. During debugging I > noticed that,

Re: [Gluster-users] Replica 2 Quorum and arbiter

Hi, Comments inline. On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Mahdi Adnan wrote: > Hi, > > > We have a replica 2 volume and we have issue with setting proper quorum. > > The volumes used as datastore for vmware/ovirt, the current settings for > the quorum are: > > >

Re: [Gluster-users] GluserFS WORM hardlink

Hi, If I did not misunderstood, you are saying that WORM is not allowing to create hard links for the files. Answering it based on that assumption. If the volume level or file level WORM feature is enabled and the file is in WORM/WORM-Retained state, then those files should be immutable and hence

Re: [Gluster-users] GlusterFS WORM mode can't create hard link pliz ㅠ

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 5:55 AM, 최두일 wrote: > hard linksA read-only file system does not produce a hard link in GlusterFS > WORM mode. Is it impossible? > It is not possible to create a hard link in WORM mode. If a file is in WORM mode then even from hard links you can not

Re: [Gluster-users] Restore a node in a replicating Gluster setup after data loss

Hay Niklaus, Sorry for the delay. The *reset-brick* should do the trick for you. You can have a look at [1] for more details. [1] https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/release-notes/3.9.0/ HTH, Karthik On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Niklaus Hofer < niklaus.ho...@stepping-stone.ch> wrote:

Re: [Gluster-users] Interesting split-brain...

Hi Ludwig, There is no way to resolve gfid split-brains with type mismatch. You have to do it manually by following the steps in [1]. In case of type mismatch it is recommended to resolve it manually. But for only gfid mismatch in 3.11 we have a way to resolve it by using the

Re: [Gluster-users] gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal

Hi Matt, The files might be in split brain. Could you please send the outputs of these? gluster volume info gluster volume heal info And also the getfattr output of the files which are in the heal info output from all the bricks of that replica pair. getfattr -d -e hex -m . Thanks & Regards

Re: [Gluster-users] gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal

; Brick tpc-arbiter1-100617:/exp/b3/gv0 > > Status: Connected > > Number of entries: 0 > > > > Brick tpc-cent-glus1-081017:/exp/b4/gv0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > &

Re: [Gluster-users] Adding bricks to an existing installation.

Hey Ludwig, Yes this configuration is fine. You can add them and do the rebalance after that. FYI: Replica 2 volumes are prone to split-brains. Replica 3 or arbiter will highly reduce the possibility of ending up in split-brains. If possible consider using one of those configurations. For more

Re: [Gluster-users] after hard reboot, split-brain happened, but nothing showed in gluster voluem heal info command !

ide it > to your, Thanks! > Ok. > > > Best regards, > *Cynthia **（周琳）* > > MBB SM HETRAN SW3 MATRIX > > Storage > Mobile: +86 (0)18657188311 > > > > *From:* Karthik Subrahmanya [mailto:ksubr...@redhat.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, September 28, 2017 2:0

Re: [Gluster-users] after hard reboot, split-brain happened, but nothing showed in gluster voluem heal info command !

Hi, To resolve the gfid split-brain you can follow the steps at [1]. Since we don't have the pending markers set on the files, it is not showing in the heal info. To debug this issue, need some more data from you. Could you provide these things? 1. volume info 2. mount log 3. brick logs 4. shd

Re: [Gluster-users] after hard reboot, split-brain happened, but nothing showed in gluster voluem heal info command !

at. They have many new features, bug fixes & performance improvements. If you can try to reproduce the issue on that would be very helpful. Regards, Karthik > Best regards, > *Cynthia **（周琳）* > > MBB SM HETRAN SW3 MATRIX > > Storage > Mobile: +86 (0)18657188311 > &

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer isolation while healing

Hi, There is no way to isolate the healing peer. Healing happens from the good brick to the bad brick. I guess your replica bricks are on a different peers. If you try to isolate the healing peer, it will stop the healing process itself. What is the error you are getting while writing? It would

Re: [Gluster-users] gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal

617:/exp/b3/gv0 > Status: Connected > Number of entries in split-brain: 0 > > Brick tpc-cent-glus1-081017:/exp/b4/gv0 > Status: Connected > Number of entries in split-brain: 0 > > Brick tpc-cent-glus2-081017:/exp/b4/gv0 > Status: Connected > Number of entries in split-b

Re: [Gluster-users] gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal

filename or /filename and if so relative to > where? /, , ? > > On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 18:54 +, Matt Waymack wrote: > > In my case I was able to delete the hard links in the .glusterfs folders > of the bricks and it seems to have done the trick, thanks! > > > > *F

Re: [Gluster-users] How to make sure self-heal backlog is empty ?

Hi, Can you provide the - volume info - shd log - mount log of the volumes which are showing pending entries, to debug the issue. Thanks & Regards, Karthik On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Matt Waymack wrote: > Mine also has a list of files that seemingly never heal. They

Re: [Gluster-users] not healing one file

Hey Richard, Could you share the following informations please? 1. gluster volume info 2. getfattr output of that file from all the bricks getfattr -d -e hex -m . 3. glustershd & glfsheal logs Regards, Karthik On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: >

Re: [Gluster-users] not healing one file

me-client-4=0x00010001 > trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020059df11cd000548ec > trusted.gfid=0xea8ecfd195fd4e48b994fd0a2da226f9 > trusted.glusterfs.quota.48e9eea6-cda6-4e53-bb4a-72059debf4c2.contri.1= > 0x9a01 > trusted.pgfid.48e9eea6-cda6-4e5

Re: [Gluster-users] gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal

t; > I've only tested with one GFID but the file it referenced _IS_ on the down > machine even though it has no GFID in the .glusterfs structure. > > On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 12:35 +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Can you check whether the same hardlinks are present

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster replicate 3 arbiter 1 in split brain. gluster cli seems unaware

Hey, Can you give us the volume info output for this volume? Why are you not able to get the xattrs from arbiter brick? It is the same way as you do it on data bricks. The changelog xattrs are named trusted.afr.virt_images-client-{1,2,3} in the getxattr outputs you have provided. Did you do a

Re: [Gluster-users] How to set up a 4 way gluster file system

Hi, With replica 2 volumes one can easily end up in split-brains if there are frequent disconnects and high IOs going on. If you use replica 3 or arbiter volumes, it will guard you by using the quorum mechanism giving you both consistency and availability. But in replica 2 volumes, quorum does

Re: [Gluster-users] split brain? but where?

Hi, Which version of gluster you are using? You can find which file is that using the following command find -samefile // Please provide the getfatr output of the file which is in split brain. The steps to recover from split-brain can be found here,

Re: [Gluster-users] gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal

: 0 > > Brick tpc-cent-glus2-081017:/exp/b3/gv0 > Status: Connected > Number of entries in split-brain: 0 > > Brick tpc-arbiter1-100617:/exp/b3/gv0 > Status: Connected > Number of entries in split-brain: 0 > > Brick tpc-cent-glus1-081017:/exp/b4/gv0 > Status:

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster replicate 3 arbiter 1 in split brain. gluster cli seems unaware

Hi Henrik, Thanks for providing the required outputs. See my replies inline. On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Henrik Juul Pedersen <h...@liab.dk> wrote: > Hi Karthik and Ben, > > I'll try and reply to you inline. > > On 21 December 2017 at 07:18, Karthik Subrahmanya

Re: [Gluster-users] Clear heal statistics

Hi, I am not aware of any command which clears the historic heal statistics. You can use the command "gluster volume start force" which will restart the SHD and clears the statistics. Regards, Karthik On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 3:23 AM, Gino Lisignoli wrote: > Is there any

Re: [Gluster-users] Dir split brain resolution

Hi, I am wondering why the other brick is not showing any entry in split brain in the heal info split-brain output. Can you give the output of stat & getfattr -d -m . -e hex from both the bricks. Regards, Karthik On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 5:03 PM, Alex K wrote: > After

Re: [Gluster-users] Dir split brain resolution

start. Now I am setting up the engine from scratch... In case I see this kind of split brain again I will get back before I start deleting :) Sure. Thanks for the update. Regards, Karthik Alex On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Karthik Subrahmanya <ksubr...@redhat.com> wrote: > H

Re: [Gluster-users] self-heal trouble after changing arbiter brick

f a file and a directory which belongs to the second replica sub volume from all the 3 bricks Brick4: gv2:/data/glusterfs Brick5: gv3:/data/glusterfs Brick6: gv1:/data/gv23-arbiter (arbiter) to see the direction of pending markers being set. Regards, Karthik > > -- > Best Regards,

Re: [Gluster-users] self-heal trouble after changing arbiter brick

Hey, Did the heal completed and you still have some entries pending heal? If yes then can you provide the following informations to debug the issue. 1. Which version of gluster you are running 2. gluster volume heal info summary or gluster volume heal info 3. getfattr -d -e hex -m . output of

Re: [Gluster-users] self-heal trouble after changing arbiter brick

.ru February 9, 2018 2:01 PM, "Karthik Subrahmanya" <ksubr...@redhat.com <%22karthik%20subrahmanya%22%20%3cksubr...@redhat.com%3E>> wrote: On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 3:23 PM, Seva Gluschenko <g...@webkontrol.ru> wrote: Hi Karthik, Thank you for your reply. The heal is

Re: [Gluster-users] self-heal trouble after changing arbiter brick

On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:46 AM, Karthik Subrahmanya <ksubr...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hey, > > Did the heal completed and you still have some entries pending heal? > If yes then can you provide the following informations to debug the issue. > 1. Which version of gluster you ar

Re: [Gluster-users] How to fix an out-of-sync node?

Hi, >From the information you provided, I am guessing that you have a replica 3 volume configured. In that case you can run "gluster volume heal " which should do the trick for you. Regards, Karthik On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:16 AM, Frizz wrote: > I have a setup with

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster replicate 3 arbiter 1 in split brain. gluster cli seems unaware

need to be able to guarantee data > integrity and availability to the users. > 7) Is glusterfs "production ready"? Because I find it hard to monitor > and thus trust in these setups. Also performance with small / many > files seems horrible at best - but that's for another discus

Re: [Gluster-users] Quorum in distributed-replicate volume

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 6:14 PM, Dave Sherohman <d...@sherohman.org> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 05:45:27PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > > "In a replica 2 volume... If we set the client-quorum option to > > > auto, then the first brick

Re: [Gluster-users] promote arbiter to full replica

Hi, Yes you can do that. - Make sure "gluster volume heal info" is zero. - Remove the arbiter brick using the command "gluster volume remove-brick replica 2 " - Add a new brick of same size as of the other 2 data brick using the command "gluster volume add-brick replica 3 " - heal info should

Re: [Gluster-users] Files not healing & missing their extended attributes - Help!

Hi, >From the logs you have pasted it looks like those files are in GFID split-brain. They should have the GFIDs assigned on both the data bricks but they will be different. Can you please paste the getfattr output of those files and their parent from all the bricks again? Which version of

Re: [Gluster-users] Split brain directory

Hey, >From the getfattr output you have provided, the directory is clearly not in split brain. If all the bricks are being blamed by others then it is called split brain. In your case only client-13 that is Brick-14 in the volume info output had a pending entry heal on the directory. That is the

Re: [Gluster-users] Can't heal a volume: "Please check if all brick processes are running."

Hi Anatoliy, The heal command is basically used to heal any mismatching contents between replica copies of the files. For the command "gluster volume heal " to succeed, you should have the self-heal-daemon running, which is true only if your volume is of type replicate/disperse. In your case you

Re: [Gluster-users] Can't heal a volume: "Please check if all brick processes are running."

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 4:33 AM, Laura Bailey <lbai...@redhat.com> wrote: > Can we add a smarter error message for this situation by checking volume > type first? Yes we can. I will do that. Thanks, Karthik > > Cheers, > Laura B > > > On Wednesday, March 14, 20

Re: [Gluster-users] Can't heal a volume: "Please check if all brick processes are running."

be reduced to, for > example, 5%? Could you point to any best practice document(s)? > Yes you can decrease it to any value. There won't be any side effect. Regards, Karthik > > Regards, > > Anatoliy > > > > > > On 2018-03-13 16:46, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > &

Re: [Gluster-users] Can't heal a volume: "Please check if all brick processes are running."

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 5:42 PM, Karthik Subrahmanya <ksubr...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Anatoliy Dmytriyev <to...@tolid.eu.org> > wrote: > >> Hi Karthik, >> >> >> Thanks a lot for the explanation. >> >&g

Re: [Gluster-users] Turn off replication

Hi Jose, By switching into pure distribute volume you will lose availability if something goes bad. I am guessing you have a nX2 volume. If you want to preserve one copy of the data in all the distributes, you can do that by decreasing the replica count in the remove-brick operation. If you have

Re: [Gluster-users] Turn off replication

me scratch > > -- > There are no active volume tasks > > - > Jose Sanchez > Systems/Network Analyst 1 > Center of Advanced Research Computing > 1601 Central A

Re: [Gluster-users] Turn off replication

> > Thanks > > Jose > > > > > - > Jose Sanchez > Systems/Network Analyst 1 > Center of Advanced Research Computing > 1601 Central Ave > <https://maps.google.com/?q=1601+Central+Ave=gmail=g>. > MSC 01 1190 > Albuquerqu

Re: [Gluster-users] Quorum in distributed-replicate volume

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 1:40 PM, Dave Sherohman <d...@sherohman.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:00:29PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > I will try to explain how you can end up in split-brain even with cluster > > wide quorum: > > Yep, the explan

Re: [Gluster-users] Scheduled AutoCommit Function for WORM Feature

Hi David, Yes it is a good to have feature, but AFAIK it is currently not in the priority/focus list. If anyone from community is interested in implementing this, is most welcome. Otherwise you need to wait for some more time until it comes to focus. Thanks & Regards, Karthik On Tue, Feb 27,

Re: [Gluster-users] Quorum in distributed-replicate volume

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 5:35 PM, Dave Sherohman <d...@sherohman.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 04:59:36PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > > > Since arbiter bricks need not be of same size as the data bricks, if > you > > > > can configure thr

Re: [Gluster-users] Quorum in distributed-replicate volume

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 4:18 PM, Dave Sherohman <d...@sherohman.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 03:20:25PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > If you want to use the first two bricks as arbiter, then you need to be > > aware of the following things: > >

Re: [Gluster-users] Quorum in distributed-replicate volume

Hi Dave, On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Dave Sherohman wrote: > I've configured 6 bricks as distributed-replicated with replica 2, > expecting that all active bricks would be usable so long as a quorum of > at least 4 live bricks is maintained. > The client quorum is

Re: [Gluster-users] Transport endpoint is not connected : issue

to at this time. > > It does change which host it does this on. > > > > Thanks. > > > > *From: *Atin Mukherjee > *Date: *Friday, August 31, 2018 at 1:03 PM > *To: *"Johnson, Tim" > *Cc: *Karthik Subrahmanya , Ravishankar N < > ravishan...@redh

Re: [Gluster-users] Transport endpoint is not connected : issue

On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 11:17 AM Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > Hey, > > We need some more information to debug this. > I think you missed to send the output of 'gluster volume info '. > Can you also provide the bricks, shd and glfsheal logs as well? > In the setup how many peer

Re: [Gluster-users] sometimes entry remains in "gluster v heal vol-name info" until visit it from mnt

Hey, Please provide the glustershd log from all the nodes and client logs on the node from where you did the lookup on the file to resolve this issue. Regards, Karthik On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 5:27 PM Ravishankar N wrote: > + gluster-users. > > Adding Karthik to see if he has some cycles to

Re: [Gluster-users] cannot add server back to cluster after reinstallation

+Sanju Rakonde & +Atin Mukherjee adding glusterd folks who can help here. On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 3:24 PM Riccardo Murri wrote: > I managed to put the reinstalled server back into connected state with > this procedure: > > 1. Run `for other_server in ...; do gluster peer probe $other_server;

Re: [Gluster-users] Heal flapping between Possibly undergoing heal and In split brain

mdpi.com > Skype: milos.cuculovic.mdpi > > Disclaimer: The information and files contained in this message > are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or > entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in > error, please notify me and

Re: [Gluster-users] Heal flapping between Possibly undergoing heal and In split brain

received this message in > error, please notify me and delete this message from your system. You may > not copy this message in its entirety or in part, or disclose its contents > to anyone. > > On 21 Mar 2019, at 12:36, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > Hi Milos, > > Thanks

Re: [Gluster-users] Heal flapping between Possibly undergoing heal and In split brain

Hi, Note: I guess the volume you are talking about is of type replica-2 (1x2). Usually replica 2 volumes are prone to split-brain. If you can consider converting them to arbiter or replica-3, they will handle most of the cases which can lead to slit-brains. For more information see [1].

Re: [Gluster-users] Heal flapping between Possibly undergoing heal and In split brain

0100 > Modify: 2019-03-20 11:28:10.834584374 +0100 > Change: 2019-03-20 14:06:07.940849268 +0100 > Birth: - > ———————— > > > The file is from brick 2 that I upgraded and st

Re: [Gluster-users] Heal flapping between Possibly undergoing heal and In split brain

ssage in > error, please notify me and delete this message from your system. You may > not copy this message in its entirety or in part, or disclose its contents > to anyone. > > On 21 Mar 2019, at 10:27, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > Hi, > > Note: I guess the volume you

Re: [Gluster-users] Replica 3 - how to replace failed node (peer)

Hi Strahil, Thank you for sharing your experience with reset-brick option. Since he is using the gluster version 3.7.6, we do not have the reset-brick [1] option implemented there. It is introduced in 3.9.0. He has to go with replace-brick with the force option if he wants to use the same path &

Re: [Gluster-users] Is "replica 4 arbiter 1" allowed to tweak client-quorum?

Hi, I guess you missed Ravishankar's reply [1] for this query, on your previous thread. [1] https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2019-April/036247.html Regards, Karthik On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 8:59 PM Ingo Fischer wrote: > Hi All, > > I had a replica 2 cluster to host my VM

Re: [Gluster-users] Replica 3 - how to replace failed node (peer)

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:23 AM Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > Hi Strahil, > > Can you give us some more insights on > - the volume configuration you were using? > - why you wanted to replace your brick? > - which brick(s) you tried replacing? > - if you remember the co

Re: [Gluster-users] Replica 3 - how to replace failed node (peer)

it never let me down. > > Best Regards, > Strahil Nikolov > On Apr 11, 2019 07:34, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > Hi Strahil, > > Thank you for sharing your experience with reset-brick option. > Since he is using the gluster version 3.7.6, we do not have the > reset-b

Re: [Gluster-users] Replica 3 - how to replace failed node (peer)

ng my experience. > Highly appreciated. Regards, Karthik > > Best Regards, > Strahil Nikolov > > В четвъртък, 11 април 2019 г., 0:53:52 ч. Гринуич-4, Karthik Subrahmanya < > ksubr...@redhat.com> написа: > > > Hi Strahil, > > Can you give us some more insights o

Re: [Gluster-users] Replica 3 - how to replace failed node (peer)

odes? I am running really > old 3.7.6 but stable version. > > Thanks, > BR! > > Martin > > > On 10 Apr 2019, at 12:20, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > After you add the new disks and creating raid array, you can run the > following command to

Re: [Gluster-users] Replica 3 - how to replace failed node (peer)

Hi Martin, After you add the new disks and creating raid array, you can run the following command to replace the old brick with new one: - If you are going to use a different name to the new brick you can run gluster volume replace-brickcommit force - If you are planning to use the same

Re: [Gluster-users] Replica 3 - how to replace failed node (peer)

> Thanks, this looks ok to me, I will reset brick because I don't have any >> data anymore on failed node so I can use same path / brick name. >> >> Is reseting brick dangerous command? Should I be worried about some >> possible failure that will impact remaining two nod

Re: [Gluster-users] Volume stuck unable to add a brick

brick - After it succeeds set back the auth.allow option to the previous value. Regards, Karthik On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 5:20 PM Boris Goldowsky wrote: > OK, log files attached. > > > > Boris > > > > > > *From: *Karthik Subrahmanya > *Date: *Tuesday, April

Re: [Gluster-users] Volume stuck unable to add a brick

You're welcome! On Tue 16 Apr, 2019, 7:12 PM Boris Goldowsky, wrote: > That worked! Thank you SO much! > > > > Boris > > > > > > *From: *Karthik Subrahmanya > *Date: *Tuesday, April 16, 2019 at 8:20 AM > *To: *Boris Goldowsky > *Cc: *Atin M

Re: [Gluster-users] adding thin arbiter

Hi, Currently we do not have support for converting an existing volume to a thin-arbiter volume. It is also not supported to replace the thin-arbiter brick with a new one. You can create a fresh thin arbiter volume using GD2 framework and play around that. Feel free to share your experience with

Re: [Gluster-users] [External] Replica 3 - how to replace failed node (peer)

Hi Martin, The reset-brick command is introduced in 3.9.0 and not present in 3.7.6. You can try using the same replace-brick command with the force option even if you want to use the same name for the brick being replaced. 3.7.6 is EOLed long back and glusterfs-6 is the latest version with lots

Re: [Gluster-users] Volume stuck unable to add a brick

On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 9:43 PM Atin Mukherjee wrote: > +Karthik Subrahmanya > > Didn't we we fix this problem recently? Failed to set extended attribute > indicates that temp mount is failing and we don't have quorum number of > bricks up. > We had two fixes which handl

Re: [Gluster-users] Healing completely loss file on replica 3 volume

Hi Dmitry, Answers inline. On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 6:26 PM Dmitry Antipov wrote: > I'm trying to manually garbage data on bricks First of all changing data directly on the backend is not recommended and is not supported. All the operations needs to be done from the client mount point. Only

Re: [Gluster-users] Healing entries get healed but there are constantly new entries appearing

/active/-client-*/private | egrep -i > 'connected') on the clients revealed that a few were not connected to all > bricks. > After restarting them, everything went back to normal. > > Regards, > Ulrich > Am 06.02.20 um 12:51 schrieb Karthik Subrahmanya: > > Hi Ulrich,

Re: [Gluster-users] Healing entries get healed but there are constantly new entries appearing

Hi Ulrich, >From the problem statement, seems like the client(s) have lost connection with brick. Can you give the following information? - How many clients are there for this volume and which version they are in? - gluster volume info & gluster volume status outputs - Check whether all the

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster Heal Issue

Hi Chris, By looking at the data provided (hope the other entry is also a file and not the parent of the file for which the stat & getfattrs are provided) it seems like the parent(s) of these entries are missing the entry pending markers on the good bricks, which is necessary to create these

Re: [Gluster-users] set: failed: Quorum not met. Volume operation not allowed. SUCCESS

wrote: > > No Luck. Same problem. > > > > I stopped the volume. > > > > I ran the remove-brick command. It warned about not being able to > > migrate files from removed bricks and asked if I want to continue. > > > > when I say 'yes' > > >

Re: [Gluster-users] set: failed: Quorum not met. Volume operation not allowed.

Hi, Since your two nodes are scrapped and there is no chance that they will come back in later time, you can try reducing the replica count to 1 by removing the down bricks from the volume and then mounting the volume back to access the data which is available on the only up brick. The remove

Re: [Gluster-users] Gfid mismatch detected - but no split brain - how to solve?

Hi, I am assuming that you are using one of the maintained versions of gluster. GFID split-brains can be resolved using one of the methods in the split-brain resolution CLI as explained in the section "3. Resolution of split-brain using gluster CLI" of

Re: [Gluster-users] File system very slow

Hi, Please provide the following information to understand the setup and debug this further: - Which version of gluster you are using? - 'gluster volume status atlassian' to confirm both bricks and shds are up or not - Complete output of 'gluster volume profile atlassian info' before running 'du'

Re: [Gluster-users] Issues with replicated gluster volume

Hi Ahemad, Sorry for a lot of back and forth on this. But we might need a few more details to find the actual cause here. What version of gluster you are running on server and client nodes? Also provide the statedump [1] of the bricks and the client process when the hang is seen. [1]

Re: [Gluster-users] Issues with replicated gluster volume

ely run the index heal command "gluster volume heal " to trigger the heal manually and you can see the entries needing heal and the progress of heal by running "gluster volume heal info". HTH, Karthik > > Any documentation on that end will be helpful. > > Tha

Re: [Gluster-users] Issues with replicated gluster volume

so.0(rpc_clnt_connection_cleanup+0x97)[0x7f4a6a1c3987] (--> > /lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(+0xf518)[0x7f4a6a1c4518] ) 0-glustervol-client-2: > forced unwinding frame type(GlusterFS 4.x v1) op(LOOKUP(27)) called at > 2020-06-16 05:16:52.258940 (xid=0xb5) > [2020-06-16 05:16:59.732060] E

Re: [Gluster-users] Issues with replicated gluster volume

gt; > kindly suggest on how to make the volume high available. > > Thanks, > Ahemad > > > > On Tuesday, 16 June, 2020, 12:09:10 pm IST, Karthik Subrahmanya < > ksubr...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > Thanks for the clarification. > In that case can

Re: [Gluster-users] Issues with replicated gluster volume

Hi Ahemad, Please provide the following info: 1. gluster peer status 2. gluster volume info glustervol 3. gluster volume status glustervol 4. client log from node4 when you saw unavailability Regards, Karthik On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:07 PM ahemad shaik wrote: > Hi There, > > I have created

Re: [Gluster-users] Self-heal never finishes

Hey, I think [1] should help you. If you can't find anything matching your situation or can't resolve it with any of the methods listed there, please open an issue for this at [2], with the following information. - volume info, volume status, heal info and shd logs from node-1 & arbiter. - Output

Re: [Gluster-users] Arbiter

Hi Andre, Striped volumes are deprecated long back, see [1] & [2]. Seems like you are using a very old version. May I know which version of gluster you are running and the gluster volume info please? Release schedule and the maintained branches can be found at [3]. [1]

Re: [Gluster-users] Arbiter

es itself, or a new node is required. [1] https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator-Guide/arbiter-volumes-and-quorum/ Regards, Karthik > --- > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira > (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram > > > > > > > Em ter., 8 de fev. de 2022 às 07:17, Kart