Re: [Gluster-users] gluster for home directories?

2018-03-08 Thread Rik Theys
Hi, On 03/08/2018 10:52 AM, Manoj Pillai wrote: > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:29 PM, Rik Theys > wrote: > > I'm currently testing gluster (3.12, now 3.13) on older machines[1] and > have created a replica 3 arbiter 1 volume

Re: [Gluster-users] gluster for home directories?

2018-03-08 Thread Manoj Pillai
Hi Rik, Nice clarity and detail in the description. Thanks! inline... On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:29 PM, Rik Theys wrote: > Hi, > > We are looking into replacing our current storage solution and are > evaluating gluster for this purpose. Our current solution uses a

Re: [Gluster-users] gluster for home directories?

2018-03-07 Thread Ondrej Valousek
...@esat.kuleuven.be] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2018 7:38 PM To: Ondrej Valousek <ondrej.valou...@s3group.com> Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] gluster for home directories? Hi, On 2018-03-07 16:35, Ondrej Valousek wrote: > Why do you need to replace your existing solution?

Re: [Gluster-users] gluster for home directories?

2018-03-07 Thread Rik Theys
Hi, On 2018-03-07 16:35, Ondrej Valousek wrote: Why do you need to replace your existing solution? If you don't need to scale out due to the capacity reasons, the async NFS server will always outperform GlusterFS The current solution is 8 years old and is reaching its end of life. The reason

Re: [Gluster-users] gluster for home directories?

2018-03-07 Thread Ondrej Valousek
Hi, Why do you need to replace your existing solution? If you don't need to scale out due to the capacity reasons, the async NFS server will always outperform GlusterFS Ondrej - The information contained in this e-mail and in any attachments is confidential and is designated solely for the