On 2020-10-06 16:59:10 +0200, Niels Möller wrote:
> There are other approaches to avoid these crashes, e.g., I think the
> recent emacs integration uses a (configurable) limit on bignum size, and
> will raise an emacs exception long before hitting GMP's limits, and the
> emacs process can go on
Colin Caine writes:
> Sorry, this patch was posted to this list last month, but I didn't see it
> in the archives. See here for related discussion:
> https://gmplib.org/list-archives/gmp-bugs/2020-September/004865.html
I asked some questions (some off list), and haven't seen satisfactory
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2020-10-06 11:51:29 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2020-10-06 04:41:42 +0100, Colin Caine wrote:
This is used by Julia to raise an OutOfMemory exception rather than having
the Julia process itself abort.
Sorry, this patch was posted to this list last month, but I didn't see it
in the archives. See here for related discussion:
https://gmplib.org/list-archives/gmp-bugs/2020-September/004865.html
Though this discussion chain about memory leaks is new :)
It's worth noting that this patch is useful
On 2020-10-06 11:51:29 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2020, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> > On 2020-10-06 04:41:42 +0100, Colin Caine wrote:
> > > This is used by Julia to raise an OutOfMemory exception rather than having
> > > the Julia process itself abort.
> > >
> > > Others on
On 2020-10-06 04:41:42 +0100, Colin Caine wrote:
> This is used by Julia to raise an OutOfMemory exception rather than having
> the Julia process itself abort.
>
> Others on stackoverflow, etc, have experienced similar problems with
> undesired aborts(), so this patch would probably be useful to
This is used by Julia to raise an OutOfMemory exception rather than having
the Julia process itself abort.
Others on stackoverflow, etc, have experienced similar problems with
undesired aborts(), so this patch would probably be useful to a variety of
users. (see: