gmp 6.2.0 documentation bug

2020-09-29 Thread TonyMcC
Hi, I think there is a word (a function name?) missing from the documentation for gmp 6.2.0. In gmp.texi, at line 2541 it reads: "it's probably best to call to get a starting point and iterate from there." Should there be a function name after "call"? Best wishes, Tony

Re: gmp 6.2.0 documentation bug

2020-09-29 Thread Marco Bodrato
Ciao, Il 2020-09-29 16:09 TonyMcC ha scritto: I think there is a word (a function name?) missing from the documentation for gmp 6.2.0. In gmp.texi, at line 2541 it reads: "it's probably best to call to get a starting point and iterate from there." Should there be a function name after

Re: gmp 6.2.0 documentation bug

2020-09-29 Thread Paul Zimmermann
Hi Tony, > I think there is a word (a function name?) missing from the > documentation for gmp 6.2.0. In gmp.texi, at line 2541 it reads: > > "it's probably best to call to get a starting point and iterate from there." > > Should there be a function name after "call"? yes, I guess you