Ciao,
Il 2022-02-04 15:57 Jack Tearle ha scritto:
Just to be clear, I purged the directory (rm -r *) and extracted (tar
xvf ../gmp621.tar) the published tar file for each run.
You mean one of the gmp-6.2.1.tar.* files from
https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gmp/ or https://gmplib.org/download/gmp/ ,
I deleted /bin/sh, and linked /bin/bash to /bin/sh, and then re-ran the
entire installation in a new directory.
The results are not quite the same. The .libs directory is now created,
but it is empty and assert.o and the rest of the programs listed below
still have the Oct 11 2021 date and
Just to be clear, I purged the directory (rm -r *) and extracted (tar
xvf ../gmp621.tar) the published tar file for each run.
On 2/4/22 02:53, Marco Bodrato wrote:
> Ciao,
>
> Il 2022-02-03 23:08 Jack Tearle ha scritto:
>> I deleted /bin/sh, and linked /bin/bash to /bin/sh, and then re-ran the
Ciao,
Il 2022-02-03 23:08 Jack Tearle ha scritto:
I deleted /bin/sh, and linked /bin/bash to /bin/sh, and then re-ran the
entire installation in a new directory.
The results are not quite the same. The .libs directory is now
created,
but it is empty and assert.o and the rest of the
Torbjörn Granlund writes:
> Marco Bodrato writes:
>
> ==> /tmp/config.guess.log <==
> ./config.guess: syntax error at line 284: `(' unexpected
>
> Perhaps the $(command ...) syntax is not known by the old SCO shell?
> Really old /bin/sh only had `command ...`.
I take it this is gmp's
Marco Bodrato writes:
==> /tmp/config.guess.log <==
./config.guess: syntax error at line 284: `(' unexpected
Perhaps the $(command ...) syntax is not known by the old SCO shell?
Really old /bin/sh only had `command ...`.
--
Torbjörn
Please encrypt, key id 0xC8601622
Ciao,
Il 2022-02-02 23:40 Jack Tearle ha scritto:
I hope the only problem is my doing something wrong.
Maybe.
Of course we can not know what you are doing.
We usually suggest to read the manual page
https://gmplib.org/manual/Reporting-Bugs before reporting problems.
I see the following:
