Il 2020-09-13 11:38 t...@gmplib.org ha scritto:
Marco Bodrato writes:
With ABI=64 I get:
16777216 ^ 768614336404564651 = 256
With ABI=32 I get:
16777216 ^ 178956971 = 256
Not a signal, nor an abort, simply an incorrect result :-)
That's undesirable.
I thought we cought overflows
Marco Bodrato writes:
With ABI=64 I get:
16777216 ^ 768614336404564651 = 256
With ABI=32 I get:
16777216 ^ 178956971 = 256
Not a signal, nor an abort, simply an incorrect result :-)
That's undesirable.
I thought we cought overflows also in this difficult a^b case by
(indirectly
Ciao,
Il 2020-09-03 19:22 ni...@lysator.liu.se ha scritto:
Mustafa Mohamad writes:
Currently GMP aborts which sends SIGBART and forcibly aborts Julia or
any linked program. With the above patch, GMP will instead throw a
__GMP_ALLOC_OVERFLOW_FUNC
Instead of forcibly aborting
Hi, I
Mustafa Mohamad writes:
> Currently GMP aborts which sends SIGBART and forcibly aborts Julia or any
> linked program. With the above patch, GMP will instead throw a
> __GMP_ALLOC_OVERFLOW_FUNC
> Instead of forcibly aborting
Hi, I understand aborting may be undesirable, but can you provide a
Dear developers,
Below we at the Julia team would love to see the following patch upstreamed:
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/blob/master/deps/patches/gmp_alloc_overflow_func.patch
Rationale:
Currently GMP aborts which sends SIGBART and forcibly aborts Julia or any
linked program. With
