Re: automake -a

2013-09-23 Thread Niels Möller
Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr writes: It seems that it would be easiest to do what the comment in .bootstrap says, remove those files from the repository and use automake -a to make sure we have a consistent version of everything (no -f so it doesn't override our specific INSTALL,

Re: automake -a

2013-09-23 Thread Marc Glisse
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013, Niels Möller wrote: Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr writes: It seems that it would be easiest to do what the comment in .bootstrap says, remove those files from the repository and use automake -a to make sure we have a consistent version of everything (no -f so it

Re: automake -a

2013-09-23 Thread Marc Glisse
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013, Vincent Lefevre wrote: On 2013-09-23 15:37:20 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote: On Mon, 23 Sep 2013, Niels Möller wrote: E.g., I think the COPYING file should stay in the repo, even if automake -a currently installs an identical file. Ah, I hadn't noticed COPYING, precisely

Re: automake -a

2013-09-23 Thread Marc Glisse
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013, Niels Möller wrote: Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr writes: Do you agree with the initial list I proposed? I don't think I've seen an explicit list. remove: doc/mdate-sh doc/texinfo.tex install-sh missing ylwrap -- Marc Glisse