ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
I think it makes sense to have --disable-assembly disable *all* use of
assembly source files.
Maybe. I suppose the file now in question is used only by
tests/devel/try for detecting ABI breaches. Compiler generated code
should not need such
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de writes:
But the failure mode is assembling assembler source - GMP should
arrange to not use the compiler driver to assemble but to call
an assembler directly for assembler source.
Are you volunteering
Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr writes:
I just added a new symbol to libgmpxx. Should I touch one of the
LIBGMPXX_LT_* in Makefile.am, mark somewhere that it may need to be
done prior to release, or ignore the (non-)issue?
You might fill in the table in Makefile.am to make sure a CXX
Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de writes:
It was just a suggestion - if I'd implement it I would default to
the compiler driver for the assembler call but allow a different
assembler to be specified via configure.
That approach makes some sense to me. Assuming such a configure option
makes
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr writes:
I just added a new symbol to libgmpxx. Should I touch one of the
LIBGMPXX_LT_* in Makefile.am, mark somewhere that it may need to be
done prior to release, or ignore the (non-)issue?
You might fill in
Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr writes:
Ok, I did that. And noticed that, although LIBMP_LT_* are still there,
mpbsd was removed a while ago (I had completely forgotten about
that...).
There always seem to be a libmp bone remaining.
--
Torbjörn
