Re: Infrastructure | Gitlab reorganisation (#333)

2021-07-30 Thread Allan Day (@aday)
Allan Day commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/333#note_1215823 It's still all to be done, really. I think it's stuck somewhere between the release team, the circle committee, and the board. @felipeborges tried to get things going again

Re: Infrastructure | Gitlab reorganisation (#333)

2021-07-30 Thread Andrea Veri (@averi)
Andrea Veri commented: @aday anything still pending here or this can be closed? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/333#note_1215769 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org.

Re: Infrastructure | Gitlab reorganisation (#333)

2020-06-22 Thread Andrea Veri
Andrea Veri commented: Me, @aday and @csoriano met. Next steps at https://etherpad.gnome.org/p/circle_admin. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/333#note_846442 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | Gitlab reorganisation (#333)

2020-06-17 Thread Andrea Veri
Andrea Veri commented: @aday, can we please schedule a meeting and go over this? got any preferred date/time? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/333#note_841844 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | Gitlab reorganisation (#333)

2020-06-16 Thread Neil McGovern
Neil McGovern commented: Let's ping the sysadmins here explicitly: cc: @averi @barthalion -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/333#note_841118 You're receiving this email because of your account on

Re: Infrastructure | Gitlab reorganisation (#333)

2020-06-16 Thread Allan Day
Allan Day commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/333#note_841114 We can certainly run any changes past the release team, in order to avoid any back and forth. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:

Re: Infrastructure | Gitlab reorganisation (#333)

2020-06-15 Thread Michael Catanzaro
Michael Catanzaro commented: Sorry, I guess we only need to worry about additions to core. The goal of figuring out core app changes before the reorg would be to avoid moving apps out of GNOME/ and then right back into GNOME/ shortly after. That only affects proposed additions, not

Re: Infrastructure | Gitlab reorganisation (#333)

2020-06-15 Thread Michael Catanzaro
Michael Catanzaro commented: Let's make an attempt to resolve at least some of the issues in https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta/-/issues/150 before proceeding with this. Currently that's blocked on https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/125 to make sure upstream changes

Infrastructure | Gitlab reorganisation (#333)

2020-06-15 Thread Allan Day
Allan Day created an issue: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/333 The Foundation Board of Directors [is proposing a new policy for how GNOME classifies its software](https://discourse.gnome.org/t/official-proposal-how-we-define-gnome-software/3371/). This