Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss) wrote:
RMS didn't like "they" used as a singular, due to issues such
as a ambiguities of reference (is the antecedent the two people
mentioned, or just the latter?) He invented gender-neutral pronouns
and uses them. Those pronouns carry no indication of someone's
Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss) wrote:
On 2021-03-24 19:55, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
Does there appear to be some form of hidden coordination behind these
articles?
As I understand, RMS always thought that proprietary software
companies would make some kind of large legal attack on the GNU
I don't know if this message will be received or not
Is it a coincidence that RMS returns to the FSF board and there is a
simultaneous campaign to censor blogs from other web sites and services?
Is anybody else experiencing these censorship attempts on mailing lists,
IRC, Planet sites, social
The public boycotting with purpose to defame RMS is posted on Github:
https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io
PLEASE COMPLAIN and express your resentment to Github by reporting
hate speech, discrimination, bullying and harassment on Github at this
page:
GitHub Support
* Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss) <936-846-2...@kylheku.com> [2021-03-25 15:35]:
> On 2021-03-24 19:13, Akira Urushibata wrote:
> > Richard Stallman recently announced at LibrePlanet that he would
> > return to the FSF board. Soon after this announcement, many articles
> > appeared online stating
On 2021-03-24 19:55, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
Does there appear to be some form of hidden coordination behind these
articles?
As I understand, RMS always thought that proprietary software
companies would make some kind of large legal attack on the GNU
project, so he was very particular about
RMS is innocent and did not do anything illegal.
* Akira Urushibata [2021-03-25 14:45]:
> If the FSF Board votes soon on whether RMS should be reinstalled,
> gives into outside pressure and decides to keep him out, the world
> would interpret this as endorsement of the widespread view that
>
On 2021-03-24 19:13, Akira Urushibata wrote:
Richard Stallman recently announced at LibrePlanet that he would
return to the FSF board. Soon after this announcement, many articles
appeared online stating strong objection to his return.
I have read several of them and I do not like what I see.
If the FSF Board votes soon on whether RMS should be reinstalled,
gives into outside pressure and decides to keep him out, the world
would interpret this as endorsement of the widespread view that
RMS "defended" Jeffrey Epstein. Now the individuals on the Board
may make their decisions on other
