Le mercredi 12 février 2020, 06:54:10 CET Mike Gerwitz a écrit :
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 16:32:53 -0500, nylxs wrote:
> > On 2/6/20 5:36 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >> The goal is to acknowledge that GNU is not the only free software
> >> provider, and that the GNU Project (socially) and the
Le jeudi 13 février 2020, 18:43:33 CET Ruben Safir a écrit :
> On 2/12/20 12:54 AM, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
> > Personal attacks weaken your argument and are not appropriate for this
> > list.
>
> No censorship does that.
Censorship doesn’t work since you circumvent it by using several mail and
Translations are derivative works of the original.
On 2020-02-14 18:45, Alexandre François Garreau wrote:
Le lundi 3 février 2020, 16:28:52 CET Benno Schulenberg a écrit :
But in practice the GNU project requires
that significant contributors sign a copyright assignment, and that
translators
Le lundi 3 février 2020, 16:28:52 CET Benno Schulenberg a écrit :
> But in practice the GNU project requires
> that significant contributors sign a copyright assignment, and that
> translators sign a copyright disclaimer.
Well, maybe it concerns only softwares, but once rms wrote something on ML
Le mercredi 5 février 2020, 07:45:48 CET Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss) a
écrit :
> On 2020-02-03 07:28, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> > the GNU System". Oof... Who are those "companion free software
> > projects"?
>
> This is basically just taking a mile-wide detour around saying "Linux".
>
>
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 16:32:53 -0500, nylxs wrote:
> On 2/6/20 5:36 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> The goal is to acknowledge that GNU is not the only free software
>> provider, and that the GNU Project (socially) and the GNU System
>> (technically) has to work with these other free software
nylxs writes:
> That is because you fail to understand the importance of Free Software,
> because honestly, you are so corrupt and greedy that you can't be
> educated, and you can not be helped.
Please keep personal attacks out of these discussions. I encourage you
to read again the GNU Kind
Hi Benno,
Benno Schulenberg skribis:
> Anyway... I've carefully read https://wiki.gnu.tools/gnu:social-contract
> (Last modified: 2020/01/22 11:55), and here are my comments.
Thanks for taking the time to read it and to comment it.
> Please don't call the document a Social Contract. The
Hi Benno,
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 04:28:52PM +0100, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> Maintainer of GNU nano talking here. I haven't followed the whole discussion,
> but I've peeked at some of the archived emails, and was disheartened by the
> tone and attitude in some of them. :|
We do try very hard
* Benno Schulenberg [2020-02-05 08:36]:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Maintainer of GNU nano talking here. I haven't followed the whole discussion,
> but I've peeked at some of the archived emails, and was disheartened by the
> tone and attitude in some of them. :|
>
> Anyway... I've carefully read
On 2020-02-03 07:28, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
The second sentence says: "The GNU Project provides a software
system..."
The word "system" is both too vague and too all-encompassing; it sounds
as
It's just missing "operating" in front of it.
if it wants to be a single, massive block of
Hi Benno,
The idea of a social contract, or any document that would require GNU
maintainers or volunteers to agree to a set of philosophical points
has already been dismissed. Those that have created this wiki page
don't represent the GNU project, or have a mandate to decide.
Hi all,
Maintainer of GNU nano talking here. I haven't followed the whole discussion,
but I've peeked at some of the archived emails, and was disheartened by the
tone and attitude in some of them. :|
Anyway... I've carefully read https://wiki.gnu.tools/gnu:social-contract
(Last modified:
13 matches
Mail list logo
