* Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> [2019-10-29 14:26]:
> Jean Louis wrote:
> > * Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> [2019-10-28 17:53]:
> >> the SKS keyserver network — the de-facto standard for years — is not
> >> [proprietary], it is a decentralized replicated network — like Usenet;
>
Jean Louis wrote:
> * Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> [2019-10-28 17:53]:
>> the SKS keyserver network — the de-facto standard for years — is not
>> [proprietary], it is a decentralized replicated network — like Usenet; while
>> keys.openpgp.org, to carry on the analogy, is like Facebook.
* Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> [2019-10-28 17:53]:
> In particular, the SKS keyserver network — the de-facto standard for
> years — is not, it is a decentralized replicated network — like
> Usenet; while keys.openpgp.org, to carry on the analogy, is like
> Facebook.
Yes, I would say it
Jean Louis wrote:
> * Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> [2019-10-28 15:21]:
>> Even if FSF, like Werner Koch , believes that there is
>> nothing wrong ethically with steering users to an isolated proprietary
>> service, the guide is simply incorrect factually.
>
> Do you refer to online
* Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> [2019-10-28 15:21]:
> Even if FSF, like Werner Koch , believes that there is
> nothing wrong ethically with steering users to an isolated
> proprietary service, the guide is simply incorrect factually.
Do you refer to online service?
Are not all websites
Werner Koch wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 14:37, 321...@gmail.com said:
>>> A problem is the single-point-of-validation (done via mail confirmation)
>>> which puts [keys.openpgp.org] in a position like X.509 CAs.
>>
>> That is, mister Brunschwig is willing to add other keyservers on a par with
On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 14:37, 321...@gmail.com said:
> And I did not. ;-) I called keys.openpgp.org a proprietary *service*,
> not a proprietary server [software]. I. e. a service, that has an
> owner = proprietor, who solely controls it.
Agreed.
>> This keyserver is not more proprietary than any
Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 07:43, 321...@gmail.com said:
>
>> describes, changed the default keyserver from the SKS round-robin pool, to a
>> *proprietary centralized service* [2], “one of whose
>
> Although I have some concerns with those validating keyservers, like
>
Hi!
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 07:43, 321...@gmail.com said:
> describes, changed the default keyserver from the SKS round-robin
> pool, to a *proprietary centralized service* [2], “one of whose
Although I have some concerns with those validating keyservers, like
keys.openpgp.org, it is wrong and
Hello. FSF’s ‘Email Self-Defence Guide’ [1] teaches those who are not yet
familiar with OpenPGP to use Thunderbird + Enigmail and features the following
text:
| In your email program's menu, select Enigmail → Key Management.
|
| Right click on your key and select Upload Public Keys to
10 matches
Mail list logo
