Hello,
almost five days after submitting my request for subscription, it was
finally approved. And a few hours before the approval happened, the
moderation rules were updated with yet more restrictions, and this
particular point:
Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:31:37 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> And for
On Tue, 2019-10-29 at 17:43 +0300, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
> if a contributor-to-be happens to be an employee
I believe this to be a mischaracterization of the situation.
This is related to the copyright assignment mentioned earlier. As an
example, some have employment contracts with wording to
> if a contributor-to-be happens to be an employee, FSF does not trust
> his words about origin of his contribution,
This seems reasonable to me in the USA. Many companies have a clause in
their contracts that say that the company owns anything the employee
creates during their tenure, *even
Jean Louis wrote:
> GNU project does not discriminate by gender, or other classes, neither
> verifies genders of contributors, or their classes, as everybody is welcome
> to contribute
To the best of my knowledge, thatʼs completely untrue: major GNU subprojects do
discriminate contributors by
"Carlos O'Donell" wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:21 AM Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Mark Wielaard wrote:
>> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 05:22:48AM +0300, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
>> >> Iʼd like to report that my message number d0eidcqu.321...@gmail.com
>> >> (below), sent a
Jean Louis wrote:
> * Florian Weimer [2019-10-24 16:32]:
>> * Alfred M. Szmidt:
>>
>> > Debian renegaded on their goal of being a 100% free software system, they
>> > now include non-free software. That is the danger, and it is very much
>> > real.
>>
>> And GNU comes with non-free
Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Alfred M. Szmidt:
>> Debian renegaded on their goal of being a 100% free software system, they
>> now include non-free software.
>
> And GNU comes with non-free documentation.
He-he. Could you please remind us, under what terms Debian Wiki is distributed?
* Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> [2019-10-29 14:26]:
> Jean Louis wrote:
> > * Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> [2019-10-28 17:53]:
> >> the SKS keyserver network — the de-facto standard for years — is not
> >> [proprietary], it is a decentralized replicated network — like Usenet;
>
Jean Louis wrote:
> * Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> [2019-10-28 17:53]:
>> the SKS keyserver network — the de-facto standard for years — is not
>> [proprietary], it is a decentralized replicated network — like Usenet; while
>> keys.openpgp.org, to carry on the analogy, is like Facebook.
