GSC 1.0 endorsement

Hi! I, maintainer of the packages GnuPG and Libgcrypt, endorse version 1.0 of the GNU Social Contract, available at . Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: State of the GNUnion 2020

* DJ Delorie [2020-02-11 23:26]: > > a...@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) writes: > > You make the incorrect assumption that the health of the GNU project > > should be measured in how many new projects are adopted or released -- > > instead of what our goal is to provide a free operating system. >

Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social Contract

On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 12:14:20PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: > > a...@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) writes: > > The wiki does not represent the views of the GNU project. Nor will it > > be hosted on GNU infrastructure, as was made quite clear by the head > > of the GNU project. > > I think we all

Re: about the GNU promise

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 16:32:53 -0500, nylxs wrote: > On 2/6/20 5:36 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> The goal is to acknowledge that GNU is not the only free software >> provider, and that the GNU Project (socially) and the GNU System >> (technically) has to work with these other free software

Re: Proposals for the new GNU/FSF relationship

Dear FSF, In response to your call for input regarding the future of the FSF/GNU relationship, Mark Wielaard posted proposals back in December on behalf of several GNU maintainers: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-misc-discuss/2019-12/msg00026.html To date, we have not received any

Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social Contract

a...@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) writes: > The wiki does not represent the views of the GNU project. Nor will it > be hosted on GNU infrastructure, as was made quite clear by the head > of the GNU project. I think we all agree on this, and repeating it is not adding anything to the

Re: State of the GNUnion 2020

a...@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) writes: > You make the incorrect assumption that the health of the GNU project > should be measured in how many new projects are adopted or released -- > instead of what our goal is to provide a free operating system. Are we DONE producing that operating system?

Re: I suspect that there is no such thing as a "GNU Social Contract"

The wiki is free to use for all GNU Maintainers. I would like to open the wiki up further for others to use, but for now we're taking small steps. One step would be to clarify that this wiki or the anti-social edict are not affiliated with the GNU project. You could even add the GNU

Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social Contract

The wiki does not represent the views of the GNU project. Nor will it be hosted on GNU infrastructure, as was made quite clear by the head of the GNU project.

Re: State of the GNUnion 2020

You make the incorrect assumption that the health of the GNU project should be measured in how many new projects are adopted or released -- instead of what our goal is to provide a free operating system. This isn't a popularity contest. It shouldn't be suprising that there will be some kind of

Re: about the GNU promise

nylxs writes: > That is because you fail to understand the importance of Free Software, > because honestly, you are so corrupt and greedy that you can't be > educated, and you can not be helped. Please keep personal attacks out of these discussions. I encourage you to read again the GNU Kind

Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social Contract

On 2020-02-06 09:32, Andrej Shadura wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/02/2020 13:39, fredomatic wrote: I, Frederic Y. Bois, maintainer of package GNU MCSim, endorse version 1.0 of the GNU Social Contract, available at .