shulie writes:
> That is MOSTLY, but not completely true. The Phone company, for
> example, can not disconnect you because your a communist.
That's an example of the contract thing I mentioned. They entered into
a contract where, in exchange for a temporary monopoly, they agreed to
operate
On 5/13/21 1:56 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> There
> is no such thing as a "free speech right" in the USA *outside of* the
> laws themselves.
That is MOSTLY, but not completely true. The Phone company, for
example, can not disconnect you because your a communist.
Jacob Bachmeyer writes:
> Since GNU is based in USA, is this particular protest obsolete, as any
> such censorship applied to us would be clearly unconstitutional,
For those outside the USA (and probably many inside too ;) ...
The USA laws don't work that way; the first amendment *only*
Il 13/05/21 04:32, Jacob Bachmeyer ha scritto:
Since GNU is based in USA, is this particular protest obsolete, as any
such censorship applied to us would be clearly unconstitutional, or are
there still possible risks here?
In short, is this protest still accurate or can we now confidently say
Jean Louis wrote:
-@c Put in by rms. Don't remove.
-@cartouche
-@strong{Future Change Warning:} Proposed Federal censorship regulations
-may prohibit us from giving you information about the possibility of
-calling this function. We would be required to say that this is not an
-acceptable way
