Not relevant here - Re: Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new wiki.gnu.tools.

2020-04-11 Thread Jean Louis
* Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro [2020-04-11 07:38]: > Hi, > > <#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign> > "Carlos O'Donell" writes: > > > https://wiki.gnu.tools > > A problem I see with this domain name is that for many people it may > reinforce the incorrect idea that GNU is essentially a collection

Re: Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new wiki.gnu.tools.

2020-04-10 Thread Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro
Hi, <#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign> "Carlos O'Donell" writes: > https://wiki.gnu.tools A problem I see with this domain name is that for many people it may reinforce the incorrect idea that GNU is essentially a collection of tools. If at all possible, “gnu.os” would have been better. --

Re: Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new wiki.gnu.tools.

2020-02-02 Thread John Darrington
If you objtained your list of adresses from the maintainers file on fp, then that was inappropriate. When maintainers give us that information, we promise it won't be used in that way. All new maintainers are automatically subscribed to the internal mailing lists unless they ask not to be.

Re: Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new wiki.gnu.tools.

2020-01-29 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
We didn’t harvest anything. I think it’s reasonable for GNU maintainers get in touch one another, and that’s unfortunately the only to do that reliably AFAIK. No, the accepted method is the internal lists. You are under no right to use the private information of GNU maintainers.

Re: Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new wiki.gnu.tools.

2020-01-29 Thread Jean Louis
* Andreas R. [2020-01-29 07:01]: > "This Code of Conduct applies within all community spaces, and also > applies when an individual is officially representing the community > in public spaces. Examples of representing our community include > using an official e-mail address, posting via an

Re: Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new wiki.gnu.tools.

2020-01-29 Thread Ruben Safir
On 1/29/20 5:46 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > It’s about building a shared understanding of what it is we’re aiming > for as a project. To me, that can only be beneficial to the project and > its cohesion. Tghere is no need for that. The purpose of GNU is outlined by the founder, Richard

Re: Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new wiki.gnu.tools.

2020-01-29 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Alfred, a...@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) skribis: > You are misusing the trust given by the GNU project by harvesting > member information and using it for non-GNU purposes. Nobody gave you > the right to use that information, in any shape or form. We didn’t harvest anything. I think it’s

Re: Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new wiki.gnu.tools.

2020-01-29 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
I understand your concern, but consider this: we are a group of GNU maintainers setting up a service for use by GNU maintainers to work on GNU. In that sense, I think it’s fair to say we’re not misusing the name. You are misusing the trust given by the GNU project by harvesting

Re: Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new wiki.gnu.tools.

2020-01-28 Thread Andreas R.
Hi Ludo, > > Since it's obviously not an official GNU wiki would it be possible to > > change > > references of "the wiki for GNU Maintainers" to "a wiki for GNU maintainers" > > and add a notice to that effect? > > > > Also, using the GNU logo is needlessly confusing. Those maintainers > >

Re: Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new wiki.gnu.tools.

2020-01-28 Thread nylxs
On 1/28/20 3:31 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > I understand your concern, but consider this: we are a group of GNU > maintainers setting up a service for use by GNU maintainers to work on > GNU. In that sense, I think it’s fair to say we’re not misusing the name. It is an unauthorized use of the

Re: Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new wiki.gnu.tools.

2020-01-28 Thread Jean Louis
* Ruben Safir [2020-01-28 20:30]: > On 1/28/20 1:03 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > > Namecheap, and likely most domain services, automatically block all > > personal information by default. Protecting users' privacy is in line > > with GNU standards. Attempting to expose people's hidden private > >

Re: Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new wiki.gnu.tools.

2020-01-28 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Andreas, "Andreas R." skribis: >> we have created a new wiki for use by GNU Maintainers. >> >>https://wiki.gnu.tools > > Since it's obviously not an official GNU wiki would it be possible to change > references of "the wiki for GNU Maintainers" to "a wiki for GNU maintainers" > and add a

Re: Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new wiki.gnu.tools.

2020-01-28 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Jean Louis, le mar. 28 janv. 2020 20:15:36 +0100, a ecrit: > your negative energy and animosity in the group where you are in. I don't see negative energy and animosity here. I however see a lot of negative energy and animosity in the people who are arguing against the proposals

Re: Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new wiki.gnu.tools.

2020-01-28 Thread Jean Louis
* Ruben Safir [2020-01-28 18:57]: > On 1/28/20 10:55 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > Myself and several other GNU Maintainers have been publicly discussing > > a GNU Social contract on gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org and what it means to > > be a GNU Project volunteer. > > > > We are continuing that

Re: Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new wiki.gnu.tools.

2020-01-28 Thread Werner Koch
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 10:55, Carlos O'Donell said: > The wiki is designed to meet the needs of GNU Maintainers who have > asked for a wiki. Given the feedback it is git based with markdown > support, and is an actively maintained wiki that is free software with Thank you for setting up a useful

Re: Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new wiki.gnu.tools.

2020-01-28 Thread Jean Louis
* Carlos O'Donell [2020-01-28 16:56]: > Myself and several other GNU Maintainers have been publicly discussing > a GNU Social contract on gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org and what it means to > be a GNU Project volunteer. > We are continuing that discussion by reaching out (by email) to all > GNU

Re: Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new wiki.gnu.tools.

2020-01-28 Thread Andreas R.
> we have created a new wiki for use by GNU Maintainers. > >https://wiki.gnu.tools Since it's obviously not an official GNU wiki would it be possible to change references of "the wiki for GNU Maintainers" to "a wiki for GNU maintainers" and add a notice to that effect? Also, using the GNU logo

Re: Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new wiki.gnu.tools.

2020-01-28 Thread DJ Delorie
Namecheap, and likely most domain services, automatically block all personal information by default. Protecting users' privacy is in line with GNU standards. Attempting to expose people's hidden private information is not.

Re: Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new wiki.gnu.tools.

2020-01-28 Thread Ruben Safir
On 1/28/20 1:03 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > Namecheap, and likely most domain services, automatically block all > personal information by default. Protecting users' privacy is in line > with GNU standards. Attempting to expose people's hidden private > information is not. Nonsense - In fact,

Re: Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new wiki.gnu.tools.

2020-01-28 Thread Ruben Safir
On 1/28/20 10:55 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > Myself and several other GNU Maintainers have been publicly discussing > a GNU Social contract on gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org and what it means to > be a GNU Project volunteer. > > We are continuing that discussion by reaching out (by email) to all > GNU

Re: Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new wiki.gnu.tools.

2020-01-28 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
Myself and several other GNU Maintainers have been publicly discussing a GNU Social contract on gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org and what it means to be a GNU Project volunteer. For anyone wishing to partake in such discussion, that are offical, one should do so on gnu-prog-discuss. There is a

Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new wiki.gnu.tools.

2020-01-28 Thread Carlos O'Donell
Myself and several other GNU Maintainers have been publicly discussing a GNU Social contract on gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org and what it means to be a GNU Project volunteer. We are continuing that discussion by reaching out (by email) to all GNU Maintainers. We look forward to your feedback! Please