Re: Authorization for commercial derivative work of GnuCash Tutorial and Concepts Guide

I agree with John, as long as it keeps with the requirements of the GFDL, which means the work is available under the same license, I have no objection. --  Chris Lyttle Sent with Airmail On July 3, 2016 at 3:19:09 PM, Linas Vepstas (linasveps...@gmail.com) wrote: The mailing list is the right

Re: Dependency change?

> On Jul 2, 2016, at 7:38 PM, Wm wrote: > > Is anyone else finding problems building 2.6.13 that they didn't have with > 2.6.12 ? It is entirely possible I've fucked something up locally, of > course. Wm, There shouldn't be any significant difference. What error

Dependency change?

Is anyone else finding problems building 2.6.13 that they didn't have with 2.6.12 ? It is entirely possible I've fucked something up locally, of course. -- Wm ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org

Re: Authorization for commercial derivative work of GnuCash Tutorial and Concepts Guide

The mailing list is the right place to make this contact. I (personally) have no problems with this, but the other developers should also think about this and reach some agreement. --linas On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Fabio Benevenuti wrote: > Dear GnuCash