Re: Python bindings and Gtk3

> On Aug 7, 2017, at 8:51 PM, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote: > > For the tab issue, can you share a screenshot or something to that effect? I > am on master build and have tabs on right-hand side as well, but it's > perfectly usable. > It’s certainly usable, I didn’t mean to

Re: Python bindings and Gtk3

Agree with Mike. GTK3 changes are looking fine. So far, only minor issues. For the tab issue, can you share a screenshot or something to that effect? I am on master build and have tabs on right-hand side as well, but it's perfectly usable. -Sumit On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Mike Alexander

Python bindings and Gtk3

You may already know this, but the Python bindings done’t work in the current master branch (they still use Gtk2). I made a brief attempt to fix this, but I don’t know either Python or Gtk3 well enough. I also noticed a cosmetic issue that you may not be aware of because I use a non-default

Re: Gnome dropping Bugzilla

> On Aug 7, 2017, at 2:24 PM, Geert Janssens wrote: > > On maandag 31 juli 2017 21:56:37 CEST John Ralls wrote: >> As I think everyone knows, we use bugzilla.gnome.org >> for bug and enhancement tracking. >> >> There's a new banner on

Re: Source directory restructuring

> On Aug 7, 2017, at 2:56 PM, Geert Janssens wrote: > > So after my houskeeping message in which I have announced the changes to src/ > business and src/libqof, I'd like to bring up my eventual goal for the source > tree. > > My main motivation to do all this

Redundant infrastructure (was:Re: Gnome dropping Bugzilla)

On maandag 7 augustus 2017 18:17:38 CEST Bruce-Robert Fenn Pocock wrote: > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017, 10:23 Derek Atkins wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Geert Janssens writes: > > > > [snip] > > …. > > > > > The drawback is our limited server admin staff and

Re: Gnome dropping Bugzilla

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017, 10:23 Derek Atkins wrote: > Hi, > > Geert Janssens writes: > > [snip] > …. > > > > The drawback is our limited server admin staff and hardware which has > come up > > a couple of times in different conversations. We have two

Re: Source directory restructuring

This sounds like a great plan to me. It will definitely make understanding the code easier than the current state. -Sumit On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: > Sounds like a great plan to me!!! > > -derek > > Geert Janssens writes:

Re: Source directory restructuring

Sounds like a great plan to me!!! -derek Geert Janssens writes: > So after my houskeeping message in which I have announced the changes to src/ > business and src/libqof, I'd like to bring up my eventual goal for the source > tree. > > My main motivation to do all

Re: Gnome dropping Bugzilla

Hi, Geert Janssens writes: [snip] >> So I think we're going to need our own bugtracker. >> >> BZ is Free and it should be fairly simple to get the Gnome bug team to ship >> us a dump of our part of the database and set up a redirect once we have >> our instance up

Source directory restructuring

So after my houskeeping message in which I have announced the changes to src/ business and src/libqof, I'd like to bring up my eventual goal for the source tree. My main motivation to do all this restructuring is to simplify. There are currently plenty of directories and I often have to guess

Re: Gnome dropping Bugzilla

On maandag 31 juli 2017 21:56:37 CEST John Ralls wrote: > As I think everyone knows, we use bugzilla.gnome.org > for bug and enhancement tracking. > > There's a new banner on every BZ page saying that Gnome plans to drop > Bugzilla and the CGit repository browser,

Housekeeping on master branch

As briefly mentioned on the 2.8 roadmap thread I'm doing some major housekeeping on the master branch. This involves a lot of shuffling files and directories around. IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT FIRST: once this work goes into master, you will need to clear your build and installation directories