Please always reply to the list instead of to individual respondents unless
explicitly asked otherwise. You can do so by using the "Reply to all" or
"Reply to list" features of your mail client.
Particularly in this case that could benefit you because I don't have an
answer for you. I'm not
On 16/02/2018 08:20, Adrien Monteleone wrote:
At least on my version of the Trial Balance report, there is no ‘Imbalance
entry’ specifically.
There is at the bottom, the Imbalance-XXX and Orphan-XXX accounts listed along
with the others.
There is also a line for ‘Unrealized Gains’ or
I am not a custodian but neither do I trust my custodians to remain 100%
invulnerable to hacking, so I continue to monitor their reports and check
them for accuracy. If all the numbers in GnuCash are correct, the GnuCash
reports can line up next to the trustees reports and usually agree to the
BTW, quixotic, while based on the famous Don Quixote, is a non-proper
(improper?) adjective, and thus does not need capitalization. Whether you
pronounce it “key-hotic” or “quick-sotic” depends on your personal
predilection, as I undetstand it.
David
> On Mar 6, 2018, at 7:57 AM, David
David,
I have IRAs, but I do not *manage* IRAs. The custodian is the entity with whom
I maintain my IRA, and so I do not need to report an IRA valuation. THEY do.
So, it is true—I do not act as custodian for others’ retirement accounts. I
wonder whether this is common for the GnuCash user
On 16/02/2018 04:55, David T. via gnucash-devel wrote:
I don’t believe I’ve seen anywhere in this thread any attempt to explain that there is a difference between IMBALANCE-XXX (an indication that you have transactions that lacked a balancing split) and the Imbalance entry in the Trial Balance
