Re: [GNC-dev] Two steps forward (Maybe three back)

Thank you This confirms my suspicion that guile is not the culprit. Excerpt [pass] line:647, test: dual amount column, with original currency headers [pass] line:651, test: dual amount column, grand totals available [pass] line:654, test: dual amount column, first transaction correct d0.1102

[GNC-dev] Debian package

Please try these before I take the next step of figuring out how to populate a ppa up on Launchpad. GnuCash-3.4   https://drive.google.com/open?id=1fV_fURy6c77e7gf6S41lTacM7dFyy7VD GnuCash-3.4-39 (current maint)    https://drive.google.com/open?id=1SO2xkPICKEpSQCvJLW6CnBVrzgvTEyHQ Thanks to

Re: [GNC-dev] Two steps forward (Maybe three back)

On 1/20/19 8:07 PM, Christopher Lam wrote: > There's no reason why the dates can't be changed. > > The reason dates straggling 1.1.1970 was chosen was because 1.1.1970 > corresponds to time 0 in time64, and I felt that having a few negative > time64 numbers would be interesting to test sorting. >

Re: [GNC-dev] Two steps forward (Maybe three back)

On 1/20/19 8:07 PM, Christopher Lam wrote: > There's no reason why the dates can't be changed. > > The reason dates straggling 1.1.1970 was chosen was because 1.1.1970 > corresponds to time 0 in time64, and I felt that having a few negative > time64 numbers would be interesting to test sorting. >

Re: [GNC-dev] Two steps forward (Maybe three back)

There's no reason why the dates can't be changed. The reason dates straggling 1.1.1970 was chosen was because 1.1.1970 corresponds to time 0 in time64, and I felt that having a few negative time64 numbers would be interesting to test sorting. However this is a weird weirdness -- the test

Re: [GNC-dev] Two steps forward (Maybe three back)

> On Jan 20, 2019, at 1:24 PM, Stephen M. Butler wrote: > > Started clean this morning by recloning the git repository. Made much > further progress but ended up with some test failures. Here are my steps: > > 1. sudo rm -rf gnucash > > 2. git clone https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash >

Re: [GNC-dev] [GNC] dpkg-builder

On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 at 19:03, Mechtilde wrote: > > Hello > > unter debian Buster you can use GnuCash version 3.4 from the Debian repo. Yes, but not in Ubuntu 18.10. Colin > > Kind regards > > > -- > Mechtilde Stehmann > ## Apache OpenOffice > ## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows >

[GNC-dev] Two steps forward (Maybe three back)

Started clean this morning by recloning the git repository.  Made much further progress but ended up with some test failures.  Here are my steps: 1.  sudo rm -rf gnucash 2.  git clone https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash 3. cd gnucash 4.  git checkout -b debian 5.  cp -r ../debian .        

Re: [GNC-dev] Static locale commit unfortunately buggy

Am Samstag, 19. Januar 2019, 23:21:58 CET schrieb John Ralls: > Christian, > > Thanks for noticing. It seems that the std::locale objects created by > boost::locale aren't quite compatible. I've resolved the problem, at least > for maint, by using boost::locale to format date-times instead of >

Re: [GNC-dev] [GNC] dpkg-builder

Hello unter debian Buster you can use GnuCash version 3.4 from the Debian repo. Kind regards -- Mechtilde Stehmann ## Apache OpenOffice ## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows ## Debian Developer ## PGP encryption welcome ## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899 39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F

Re: [GNC-dev] [GNC] dpkg-builder

On 1/20/19 2:36 AM, Andrew Clark wrote: > There's a GnuCash 3.4 Debian package in buster/testing > already? https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gnucash > > > > On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 07:36, Stephen M. Butler > wrote: > > Anybody a wizard with dpkg-builder?  Still trying to

Re: [GNC-dev] AppImage

Op zondag 20 januari 2019 13:11:31 CET schreef cicko: > Great! Could you point me to where I can find these, please? I'm happy to > try them out. > The beta for the nightly builds flatpak repository lives here: https://code.gnucash.org/builds/flatpak/repo The public key used to sign the flatpaks

Re: [GNC-dev] AppImage

Great! Could you point me to where I can find these, please? I'm happy to try them out. -- Sent from: http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/GnuCash-Dev-f1435356.html ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org

Re: [GNC-dev] [6f3499590 Usability improvements for Bayes editor window] (was: gnucash maint: Multiple changes pushed

Op zaterdag 19 januari 2019 21:10:11 CET schreef Christian Stimming: > I did use this feature a little bit more. Sure, in an ideal world, > there would be an undo button, but here and as long as we are in C > this is not achievable. So we make our own assessment on how painful > an accidental