Re: (+1) Druid - Assistant in Docs

2010-11-05 Thread Christian Stimming
Zitat von Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com: On 5 November 2010 09:41, Mike Evans mi...@saxicola.idps.co.uk wrote: Just a thought concerning the use of druid in the docs.  Earlier this year It was discussed that the use of druid is deprecated in favour of assistant in the GNOME Human Interface

Re: (+1) Druid - Assistant in Docs

2010-11-05 Thread David T.
Subject: Re: (+1) Druid - Assistant in Docs To: clan...@googlemail.com Cc: gnucash-devel@gnucash.org Date: Friday, November 5, 2010, 5:23 AM Zitat von Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com: On 5 November 2010 09:41, Mike Evans mi...@saxicola.idps.co.uk wrote: Just a thought concerning the use

Re: (+1) Druid - Assistant in Docs

2010-11-05 Thread z33b0b
I think it was the FOSS community's tongue-in-cheek response to Microsoft's use of the term wizard for this role. Personally, assistant sounds just fine to me, and seems much less likely to cause confusion. Just my 2p, -- Erik Anderson On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:58 AM, David T.

Re: (+1) Druid - Assistant in Docs

2010-11-05 Thread Mark Haanen
Op vrijdag 05-11-2010 om 10:21 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef z33...@gmail.com: I think it was the FOSS community's tongue-in-cheek response to Microsoft's use of the term wizard for this role. Personally, assistant sounds just fine to me, and seems much less likely to cause confusion. Indeed.