> On Dec 24, 2018, at 3:23 PM, Frank H. Ellenberger
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 24.12.18 um 22:10 schrieb John Ralls:
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 24, 2018, at 9:44 AM, Frank H. Ellenberger
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 24.12.18 um 18:30 schrieb John Ralls:
Agreed in principle, but in this case
There is still a strong argument to clean up these reports...
They are generally messy, lots of duplicate code, impose new
translatable strings; they use localised C API such as
xaccAccountGetTaxUSCode (even taxtxf-de_DE.scm calls it), are poorly tested.
I have not touched any of them
Am 24.12.18 um 22:10 schrieb John Ralls:
>
>
>> On Dec 24, 2018, at 9:44 AM, Frank H. Ellenberger
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 24.12.18 um 18:30 schrieb John Ralls:
>>> Agreed in principle, but in this case ISTM it would make more sense to just
>>> remove them.
>>
>> Then all books based on
> On Dec 24, 2018, at 9:44 AM, Frank H. Ellenberger
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 24.12.18 um 18:30 schrieb John Ralls:
>> Agreed in principle, but in this case ISTM it would make more sense to just
>> remove them.
>
> Then all books based on SKR04 will crash. That was the reason, it became
>
On 12/24/18 1:35 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
Op maandag 24 december 2018 02:33:39 CET schreef Frank H. Ellenberger:
I would suspect
either the change of locale-specific-tax from an option to the default
behaviour in configure was not completely ported to cmake
or it was not applied if the
Am 24.12.18 um 18:30 schrieb John Ralls:
> Agreed in principle, but in this case ISTM it would make more sense to just
> remove them.
Then all books based on SKR04 will crash. That was the reason, it became
default.
> de_DE.scm hasn’t been substantively maintained since it was first committed
> On Dec 24, 2018, at 1:35 AM, Geert Janssens
> wrote:
>
> Op maandag 24 december 2018 02:33:39 CET schreef Frank H. Ellenberger:
>> I would suspect
>>
>> either the change of locale-specific-tax from an option to the default
>> behaviour in configure was not completely ported to cmake
>>
Op maandag 24 december 2018 02:33:39 CET schreef Frank H. Ellenberger:
> I would suspect
>
> either the change of locale-specific-tax from an option to the default
> behaviour in configure was not completely ported to cmake
>
> or it was not applied if the locale was C.
>
> Frank
As far as I
I would suspect
either the change of locale-specific-tax from an option to the default
behaviour in configure was not completely ported to cmake
or it was not applied if the locale was C.
Frank
Am 24.12.18 um 02:12 schrieb c.holterm...@gmx.de:
> For me it is
> * 02:10:26 WARN Could not
For me it is
* 02:10:26 WARN Could not locate module gnucash/tax/us
interface v.0
wrote
`/home/christoph/oldhome_moved/Computer/src/gnucash/gnucash-git-fork-c.holtermann/lib64/gnucash/scm/ccache/2.2/gnucash/report/locale-specific/us.go'
I'm in germany and no compile issues with the de_DE
I just did a git pull and then build of of the maint branch. Saw this
slide past during the make step.
[ 92%] Generating
../../../../lib/gnucash/scm/ccache/2.0/gnucash/report/locale-specific/de_DE.go
(process:16634): gnc.module-WARNING **: 13:49:35.430: Could not locate
module
11 matches
Mail list logo