On 17/09/2013 14:59, John Ralls wrote:
On Sep 17, 2013, at 12:14 AM, Wm Tarr wm.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13/09/2013 15:11, Derek Atkins wrote:
John Ralls jra...@code.gnucash.org writes:
Yet another corner where forgetting to run a edit-commit cycle when
changing state breaks database save.
On 13/09/2013 15:11, Derek Atkins wrote:
John Ralls jra...@code.gnucash.org writes:
Yet another corner where forgetting to run a edit-commit cycle when
changing state breaks database save.
And people wonder why I still recommend against using the SQL backend
for real data.. ;)
-derek
On Sep 17, 2013, at 12:14 AM, Wm Tarr wm.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13/09/2013 15:11, Derek Atkins wrote:
John Ralls jra...@code.gnucash.org writes:
Yet another corner where forgetting to run a edit-commit cycle when
changing state breaks database save.
And people wonder why I still
John Ralls jra...@code.gnucash.org writes:
Yet another corner where forgetting to run a edit-commit cycle when
changing state breaks database save.
And people wonder why I still recommend against using the SQL backend
for real data.. ;)
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95
On Sep 13, 2013, at 7:11 AM, Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu wrote:
John Ralls jra...@code.gnucash.org writes:
Yet another corner where forgetting to run a edit-commit cycle when
changing state breaks database save.
And people wonder why I still recommend against using the SQL backend
for
Newbie here... Hope this isn't an obvious question, but wondering by the
way: Is there a stable trunk of gnucash that contains just the bare-bones,
double-entry core, sans the business features? Would one have to custom
recompile the program from scratch?
Mike
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:43
On Sep 13, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Michael Ferrara mferr...@caltech.edu wrote:
Newbie here... Hope this isn't an obvious question, but wondering by the
way: Is there a stable trunk of gnucash that contains just the bare-bones,
double-entry core, sans the business features? Would one have to
