Ngewi Fet nge...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu wrote:
John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us writes:
Why can't we set up commit hooks on each that immediately push to the
other? Yes, there's a small chance of a conflict if two people
On Friday 09 Nov 2012, Derek Atkins wrote:
Ngewi Fet nge...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu wrote:
John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us writes:
Why can't we set up commit hooks on each that immediately push to
the other? Yes, there's a
Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be writes:
I'd rather see it the other way. If developers commit to
code.gnucash.org, while all others fork from github you get a similar
indirection like we have now with svn. I don't like that. It's a
source for all kinds of small errors and sync
Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be writes:
John,
From what I see you and Christian have the most experience with
working in git. So I'm tempted to follow your advice. The above is
mostly my opinion, but clearly limited due to a lack of experience.
So for now, the proposal stands as:
On 06-11-12 16:10, Derek Atkins wrote:
Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be writes:
John,
From what I see you and Christian have the most experience with
working in git. So I'm tempted to follow your advice. The above is
mostly my opinion, but clearly limited due to a lack of experience.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu wrote:
John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us writes:
Why can't we set up commit hooks on each that immediately push to the
other? Yes, there's a small chance of a conflict if two people push
changes of the same file to each repository
On 03-11-12 15:57, John Ralls wrote:
On Nov 3, 2012, at 5:14 AM, Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote:
On 01-11-12 16:10, Derek Atkins wrote:
Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be writes:
[snip]
Let's continue to build on this. I propose this setup:
One master repo hosted on
On 01-11-12 16:10, Derek Atkins wrote:
Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be writes:
[snip]
Let's continue to build on this. I propose this setup:
One master repo hosted on github. One canonical repo on
code.gnucash.org pulls periodically from this master repo to keep in
sync.
Only
On Nov 3, 2012, at 5:14 AM, Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote:
On 01-11-12 16:10, Derek Atkins wrote:
Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be writes:
[snip]
Let's continue to build on this. I propose this setup:
One master repo hosted on github. One canonical repo on
Am Mittwoch, 31. Oktober 2012, 15:33:02 schrieb Geert Janssens:
This discussion has been had multiple times before and frankly I hope
this will be the last time.
Yes.
- Nobody opposed to using github. In fact most developers are in favour
of using it.
- John indicated that github is good,
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:26:05 -0700
John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
On Oct 31, 2012, at 7:33 AM, Geert Janssens
janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote:
This discussion has been had multiple times before and frankly I
hope this will be the last time.
The previous discussion didn't end
On 01-11-12 10:29, Christian Stimming wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 31. Oktober 2012, 15:33:02 schrieb Geert Janssens:
This discussion has been had multiple times before and frankly I hope
this will be the last time.
Yes.
- Nobody opposed to using github. In fact most developers are in favour
of using
Christian Stimming christ...@cstimming.de writes:
I guess all of the recent committers should be added, such as the full list
from the file git-helper-scripts/gnc_authors. However, some of them don't
seem
to have a github account, do they? E.g., Derek?
derekatkins
-derek
--
Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be writes:
[snip]
Let's continue to build on this. I propose this setup:
One master repo hosted on github. One canonical repo on
code.gnucash.org pulls periodically from this master repo to keep in
sync.
Only selected developers have commit access to
This discussion has been had multiple times before and frankly I hope
this will be the last time.
The previous discussion didn't end in an explicit consensus, but I think
we were close to finding a compromise at least. A summary:
- Nobody opposed to using github. In fact most developers are
On Oct 31, 2012, at 7:33 AM, Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote:
This discussion has been had multiple times before and frankly I hope this
will be the last time.
The previous discussion didn't end in an explicit consensus, but I think we
were close to finding a compromise at
16 matches
Mail list logo
