John Ralls writes:
[snip]
> We may want to pre-process the db dump to have sequential
> numbers. It’s something to think about.
I don't think we would want to renumber our existing bugs. I think it's
useful to keep the current numbers, as we already reference e.g. Bug
#xxx
Op donderdag 15 februari 2018 05:08:37 CET schreef John Ralls:
> The thing is that a db dump will be a snapshot, so what we want to do is
> have BZ set up and ready to go on code, then get the Gnome bug team to turn
> off our BZ instance there and send us a dump that we can immediately load
> and
It might take that long to get a db dump. ;-)
But yes, you're right.
-derek
Sent using my mobile device. Please excuse any typos.
On February 14, 2018 8:37:55 PM John Ralls wrote:
On Feb 14, 2018, at 8:10 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
John Ralls
> On Feb 14, 2018, at 8:10 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> John Ralls writes:
>
>> I think the only thing there that will impact us is bugzilla.
>
> We should really start thinking about running our own BZ instance,
> assuming we can get a DB Dump from
John Ralls writes:
> I think the only thing there that will impact us is bugzilla.
We should really start thinking about running our own BZ instance,
assuming we can get a DB Dump from GNOME.
> Regards,
> John Ralls
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95
el-l...@gnome.org
> <mailto:desktop-devel-l...@gnome.org>>, Foundation
> List <foundation-l...@gnome.org <mailto:foundation-l...@gnome.org>>
> Subject: Re: Planned MAJOR OUTAGE: Thursday 08th of February, 17:00 -
> 19:00 UTC
> Message-I
esktop-devel-l...@gnome.org>,Foundation
> List <foundation-l...@gnome.org>
> Subject: Planned MAJOR OUTAGE: Thursday 08th of February, 17:00 -
> 19:00 UTC
> Message-ID:
>