Re: Beyond 2.8 - version numbering

Op woensdag 10 januari 2018 19:37:30 CET schreef Adrien Monteleone: > Would you switch numbering schemes entirely if you switched to Qt? I suppose > until GnuCash adopts an MVC approach, incrementing the major version with > gtk (or Qt) changes has merit, but I would think the ‘cleaner’ approach >

Re: Beyond 2.8 - version numbering

> On Jan 10, 2018, at 11:00 AM, Geert Janssens > wrote: > > Op donderdag 4 januari 2018 00:23:57 CET schreef Frank H. Ellenberger: >> Am 03.01.2018 um 17:41 schrieb Derek Atkins: >>> I see no reason that we can't jump from 2.7.x to 3.0[.0] when we release. >>> And

Re: Beyond 2.8 - version numbering

Op donderdag 4 januari 2018 00:23:57 CET schreef Frank H. Ellenberger: > Am 03.01.2018 um 17:41 schrieb Derek Atkins: > > I see no reason that we can't jump from 2.7.x to 3.0[.0] when we release. > > And since we DID upgrade to GTK3, I think we should do that. > > +1 How is the upgrade to gtk3

Re: Version Numbering

On Saturday 30 May 2015 17:12:08 John Ralls wrote: On May 30, 2015, at 3:24 PM, Chris Good chris.g...@ozemail.com.au wrote: Hi John Geert, Everybody has had a chance to express their opinion now. There doesn't seem to be a consensus on what the version number segments should be

RE: Version Numbering

- From: Geert Janssens [mailto:geert.gnuc...@kobaltwit.be] Sent: Tuesday, 31 March 2015 1:32 AM To: gnucash-devel@gnucash.org Cc: David Raker; Chris Good Subject: Re: Version Numbering David, Thank you for your input. It more or less summarizes what I believe is a pretty common

Re: Version Numbering

On May 30, 2015, at 3:24 PM, Chris Good chris.g...@ozemail.com.au wrote: Hi John Geert, Everybody has had a chance to express their opinion now. There doesn't seem to be a consensus on what the version number segments should be called in the community as a whole. There has been a lot

Re: Version Numbering

David, Thank you for your input. It more or less summarizes what I believe is a pretty common versioning strategy in many free software projects. And since we are a free software project ourselves wed need good reasons to follow a different route as doing so reduces the common knowledge

Re: Version Numbering

. David T. On Mar 28, 2015, at 4:02 PM, Chris Good chris.g...@ozemail.com.au wrote: Hi All, I've asked for people to give their opinions on a GnuCash version numbering system as, from my few small documentation contributions, I think this should be defined somewhere. I'll summarise what

Re: Version Numbering

Am 29.03.2015 um 00:02 schrieb Chris Good: I think it is generally agreed, (from the small number of opinions expressed so far), that level 2 should be Major and level 3 should be Minor. Can everyone that has an opinion please let us know, particularly regarding the level 1 name? Well, IIRC,

RE: Version Numbering

Hi All, I've asked for people to give their opinions on a GnuCash version numbering system as, from my few small documentation contributions, I think this should be defined somewhere. I'll summarise what I've observed so far now that's it's been a week. There has been some good input about what

RE: Version Numbering

to give their opinions on a GnuCash version numbering system as, from my few small documentation contributions, I think this should be defined somewhere. I'll summarise what I've observed so far now that's it's been a week. There has been some good input about what the 3 segments of the GnuCash

Re: Version Numbering

Am Montag, 23. März 2015, 09:20:56 schrieb John Ralls: Instead, from my point of view we should consider incrementing our first version number from 2 to 3 at some not-too-distant point in the future, as soon as this number change would represent something useful for the user. For

Re: Version Numbering

! Global or Fundamental to indicate that the way the program works is different from before? Regards, John Ralls Thanks for picking up my 'faux pas' re odd/even numbering (temporary brain fade I hope). I've done a little research on version numbering best practices. http

RE: Version Numbering

-Original Message- From: John Ralls [mailto:jra...@ceridwen.us] Sent: Sunday, 22 March 2015 2:59 PM To: Chris Good Cc: gnucash-devel@gnucash.org Subject: Re: Version Numbering On Mar 22, 2015, at 9:51 AM, Chris Good mailto:chris.g...@ozemail.com.au chris.g