Hi Tim,
Am Donnerstag, den 13.03.2008, 14:26 -0400 schrieb Tim Wunder:
On Saturday 08 March 2008 07:13:31 pm Andreas Köhler wrote:
Hi Tim,
On Do, 2008-02-07 at 16:37 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
---8---
Well, it's possible that GetBalanceAsOfDate goes forward in time
instead of
On Saturday 08 March 2008 07:13:31 pm Andreas Köhler wrote:
Hi Tim,
On Do, 2008-02-07 at 16:37 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
---8---
Well, it's possible that GetBalanceAsOfDate goes forward in time
instead of backwards in time, which means that the more transactions
you have the longer it
Andreas,
Andreas Köhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Derek, in the currently active code we walk through the splits from the
head of the list, searching for the first split (A) with a posted date
= the given one, and then return the balance of the split preceding A.
In the book closing code you
Hi Tim,
On Do, 2008-02-07 at 16:37 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
---8---
Well, it's possible that GetBalanceAsOfDate goes forward in time
instead of backwards in time, which means that the more transactions
you have the longer it takes.
---8---
may you please tell me a few more numbers?
* with
Andreas Köhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 29.02.2008, 11:14 -0500 schrieb Derek Atkins:
Quoting Andreas Köhler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So.. We could probably solve this by keeping a tail pointer and
then we could search from the end instead of the front.
FWIW, I think
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 04:37:35PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
...
Well, it's possible that GetBalanceAsOfDate goes forward in time
instead of backwards in time, which means that the more transactions
you have the longer it takes.
might be a source of problems in income statement as well as
Andreas Köhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I see r16713, r16714, r16715 and r16848. Anyone left?
That looks like all of them.
-- andi5
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL:
Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 04:37:35PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
...
Well, it's possible that GetBalanceAsOfDate goes forward in time
instead of backwards in time, which means that the more transactions
you have the longer it takes.
might be
Hi Derek,
Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 04:37:35PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
...
Well, it's possible that GetBalanceAsOfDate goes forward in time
instead of backwards in time, which means that the more transactions
you have the longer
Quoting Andreas Köhler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So.. We could probably solve this by keeping a tail pointer and
then we could search from the end instead of the front.
FWIW, I think that is what GQueues are made for.
Hmm. Indeed. I wonder when these were introduced?
-- andi5
-derek
--
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 29.02.2008, 11:14 -0500 schrieb Derek Atkins:
Quoting Andreas Köhler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So.. We could probably solve this by keeping a tail pointer and
then we could search from the end instead of the front.
FWIW, I think that is what GQueues are made for.
Hmm.
Hi Derek,
Am Montag, den 04.02.2008, 10:42 -0500 schrieb Derek Atkins:
Christian Stimming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2008 22:18 schrieb Andreas Köhler:
Over this weekend I implemented a simple book closing feature
that lets you zeroize the Income and Expense
On Feb 6, 2008, at 9:16 PM, David Reiser wrote:
Using Tim's approach, I have:
642 accounts
6423 transactions
and it took 4 minutes, 6 seconds to close the books.
1minute 46 seconds for a trial balance.
Dave
--
David Reiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK --- we seem to be seeing that test
Wow! I didn't think my algorithms were THAT bad! Okay, I'll
see about adding a progress dialog.. Unless someone else
can get to it first. I probably wont have time for a bit.
-derek
David Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Using Tim's approach, I have:
642 accounts
6423 transactions
and
On Thursday 07 February 2008 04:37:35 pm Derek Atkins wrote:
Mike or Penny Novack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
snip
of each account as of some specified date). You could ask your testers
to give you the time one of these things took. No point looking for
what might be wrong with your closing
Mike or Penny Novack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wow! I didn't think my algorithms were THAT bad! Okay, I'll
see about adding a progress dialog.. Unless someone else
can get to it first. I probably wont have time for a bit.
-derek
Derek,
Would you want me to take a look? Lot's of
On Feb 6, 2008, at 9:16 PM, David Reiser wrote:
Using Tim's approach, I have:
642 accounts
6423 transactions
and it took 4 minutes, 6 seconds to close the books.
1minute 46 seconds for a trial balance.
Dave
--
David Reiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 08:39:52AM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now that I've muddied the discussion, I withhold my vote pending some
more firm idea of the proposed release date for 2.4.
I suspect 2.4 wont be out until the end of '08 at the
On Wednesday 06 February 2008 10:16:53 am Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 08:39:52AM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
I *still* haven't tested it (school's got me so busy) but I would
agree with Tim, that maybe there should be some indicator of progress,
or at least a now
On Feb 6, 2008, at 10:35 AM, Tim Wunder wrote:
On Wednesday 06 February 2008 10:16:53 am Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 08:39:52AM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
I *still* haven't tested it (school's got me so busy) but I would
agree with Tim, that maybe there should be
Quoting David Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is there a convenient way to count total transactions? I have about
[z]cat datafile | grep gnc:transaction | wc
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
On Wednesday 06 February 2008 11:33:42 am Derek Atkins wrote:
Quoting David Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is there a convenient way to count total transactions? I have about
[z]cat datafile | grep gnc:transaction | wc
-derek
Won't that double the actual transaction count since there's a
Using Tim's approach, I have:
642 accounts
6423 transactions
and it took 4 minutes, 6 seconds to close the books.
Dave
--
David Reiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 6, 2008, at 11:22 AM, Tim Wunder wrote:
On Wednesday 06 February 2008 11:08:05 am David Reiser wrote:
Is there a convenient way to
On Saturday 02 February 2008 11:22:59 am Manfred Usselmann wrote:
Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Sat, 2 Feb 2008 08:37:42
-0500:
On Saturday 02 February 2008 03:34:59 am Christian Stimming wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2008 22:18 schrieb Andreas Köhler:
Over this weekend I
Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now that I've muddied the discussion, I withhold my vote pending some
more firm idea of the proposed release date for 2.4.
I suspect 2.4 wont be out until the end of '08 at the earliest.
A
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM
Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My main complaint with it is that, for my data file, it takes what seems like
a long time to complete, and it offers no feedback to the user that something
is happening during that time. While that's not a game breaker, it adds a
level of unfinishedness
On Tuesday 05 February 2008 09:42:06 am Derek Atkins wrote:
Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My main complaint with it is that, for my data file, it takes what seems
like a long time to complete, and it offers no feedback to the user that
something is happening during that time. While
Christian Stimming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2008 22:18 schrieb Andreas Köhler:
Over this weekend I implemented a simple book closing feature
that lets you zeroize the Income and Expense accounts into
Equity. It's comprised of changesets r16713, 16714, and 16715.
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 05:22:59PM +0100, Manfred Usselmann wrote:
Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Sat, 2 Feb 2008 08:37:42
...
Unless it's changed from the last time I tried it at the end of
December, I'd recommend against backport. Adding features that are
probably complete
Am Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2008 22:18 schrieb Andreas Köhler:
Over this weekend I implemented a simple book closing feature
that lets you zeroize the Income and Expense accounts into
Equity. It's comprised of changesets r16713, 16714, and 16715.
It's only impemented in the trunk branch at
On Saturday 02 February 2008 03:34:59 am Christian Stimming wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2008 22:18 schrieb Andreas Köhler:
Over this weekend I implemented a simple book closing feature
that lets you zeroize the Income and Expense accounts into
Equity. It's comprised of changesets
Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Sat, 2 Feb 2008 08:37:42
-0500:
On Saturday 02 February 2008 03:34:59 am Christian Stimming wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2008 22:18 schrieb Andreas Köhler:
Over this weekend I implemented a simple book closing feature
that lets you zeroize the
Hi,
On Mi, 2007-12-26 at 17:21 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
Hi,
Over this weekend I implemented a simple book closing feature
that lets you zeroize the Income and Expense accounts into
Equity. It's comprised of changesets r16713, 16714, and 16715.
It's only impemented in the trunk branch at
Quoting Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 22:23 -0500, Tim Wunder wrote:
On Wednesday 26 December 2007 05:21:06 pm Derek Atkins wrote:
Hi,
Over this weekend I implemented a simple book closing feature
that lets you zeroize the Income and Expense accounts into
Hi,
Quoting Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Couple things:
* it'd be nice to have some sort of feedback to the user that something is
happening. How hard would it be to add a progress bar or something?
Is it really slow enough that a progress bar is needed? In my cursory
tests the process
On Friday 28 December 2007 07:55:59 am Derek Atkins wrote:
Hi,
Quoting Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Couple things:
* it'd be nice to have some sort of feedback to the user that something
is happening. How hard would it be to add a progress bar or something?
Is it really slow enough
On Dec 28, 2007 9:08 AM, Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* It might also be a good idea for the user to be presented with a review
dialog with suitable warning about book closing. Something like This
will create a zeroing transaction for all your income and expense
accounts as of
On Wednesday 26 December 2007 05:21:06 pm Derek Atkins wrote:
Hi,
Over this weekend I implemented a simple book closing feature
that lets you zeroize the Income and Expense accounts into
Equity. It's comprised of changesets r16713, 16714, and 16715.
It's only impemented in the trunk branch
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 22:23 -0500, Tim Wunder wrote:
On Wednesday 26 December 2007 05:21:06 pm Derek Atkins wrote:
Hi,
Over this weekend I implemented a simple book closing feature
that lets you zeroize the Income and Expense accounts into
Equity. It's comprised of changesets r16713,
Hi,
Over this weekend I implemented a simple book closing feature
that lets you zeroize the Income and Expense accounts into
Equity. It's comprised of changesets r16713, 16714, and 16715.
It's only impemented in the trunk branch at the moment.
Please test and comment and let me know if you find
40 matches
Mail list logo
