On Tuesday 10 July 2007 00:53, Derek Atkins wrote:
Christian Stimming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then, I have a conceptual addition with dates. Do you already have plans
for different date separators? In the struct date_format_internal there
is only '/'. Eventually, the code needs to take
Quoting Nikos Charonitakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/browser/gnucash/trunk/packaging/win32/gnucash.iss.in?format=raw
Unfortunately the file contains characters by at least two
different encodings
by now: iso-8859-1 for the German umlauts, and iso-8859-7 for the
Thanks for all of your comments!
Christian and I already discussed some of his email in #gnucash, but
I'll summarize that discussion here, and respond to the rest of his
comments as well as those from Derek and Thomas about the date
parsing.
On 7/8/07, Christian Stimming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Chintan,
I think I'm at the point with the CSV import where I would be ready to
integrate a date parser that could be used by both the QIF and CSV
imports, so I was just wondering how far you are as far as date
parsing code is concerned. I'm happy to write the date parsing
function, but I
Hi all,
on Tuesday 10 July 2007 12:39, Benjamin Sperisen wrote:
Hi Chintan,
I think I'm at the point with the CSV import where I would be ready to
integrate a date parser that could be used by both the QIF and CSV
imports, so I was just wondering how far you are as far as date
parsing code
Chris, Nathan, and all,
I think we're ready for 2.2.0. We've fixed a whole number of Windows bugs; we
reduced the showstoppers on Windows to a minimum; and we've fixed a
significant number of overall bugs as well. I think we can go ahead and
release 2.2.0 at the next date that seems fit.
As
Thomas,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The QIF code has a decent date parser, although it's in scheme
right now. The regex looks like:
^ *([0-9]+) *[-/.'] *([0-9]+) *[-/.'] *([0-9]+).*$|^
*([0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]).*$
In other words the seperators are a dash (-), slash (/),
Ben,
Benjamin Sperisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just committed some changes that should make the lib/stf code
compile with goffice 0.2, but if anyone still has problems, please let
me know. For now, I've commented out the calls to functions that are
in goffice-0.3, and I'll uncomment them
Thomas Baumgart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You might find some more information about the problem here:
http://kmymoney2.sourceforge.net/online-manual/details.impexp.qifimp.html#id2512201
Interesting. The way I'd handle it is to assume 70-99 - 1970-1999
and 00-60 == 2000-2060. If we find a
Benjamin Sperisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, if you've already started on one, just tell me and I'll start
tracking it. If not, is it alright with you if I write it? It would
probably have a prototype like:
time_t gnc_parse_date(char* str, int format);
where format is in an enumeration
On 7/10/07, Christian Stimming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris, Nathan, and all,
I think we're ready for 2.2.0. We've fixed a whole number of Windows bugs;
we
reduced the showstoppers on Windows to a minimum; and we've fixed a
significant number of overall bugs as well. I think we can go
Hi Manfred!
Thanks for the list, and my apologies for not responding more quickly. I
have added it to the Wiki
Nathan
PS: you can sign up for an account on our wiki if you want.
On 6/28/07, Manfred Usselmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Nathan,
On Wed, 23 May 2007 10:26:09 -0400
Nathan
Hi,
AFAIK english rebate is much more general than german Rabatt, which is a
special kind of discount. So I think, as split-register paired
with Aufwendung is the other meaning, where Erstattung fits better.
Frank
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
13 matches
Mail list logo
