Op maandag 20 november 2017 19:48:41 CET schreef Geert Janssens:
> Op maandag 20 november 2017 06:02:20 CET schreef John Ralls:
> > > On Nov 19, 2017, at 8:28 PM, Sébastien de Menten
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > btw, how can I keep backward compatibility in this case so that my
Op maandag 20 november 2017 06:02:20 CET schreef John Ralls:
> > On Nov 19, 2017, at 8:28 PM, Sébastien de Menten
> > wrote:
> >
> > btw, how can I keep backward compatibility in this case so that my reports
> > work for both gnucash 2.7/2.8 and gnucash 2.6 ?
> >
> >
> >
> On Nov 20, 2017, at 9:02 AM, Sébastien de Menten wrote:
>
> yes, the same can be done in scheme but the question is "will scheme
> reports/scripts need to be rewritten for Gnucash 2.7/2.8?" (i.e. no back
> compatibility guaranteed)
>
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:50 PM,
yes, the same can be done in scheme but the question is "will scheme
reports/scripts need to be rewritten for Gnucash 2.7/2.8?" (i.e. no back
compatibility guaranteed)
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:50 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 20, 2017, at 1:37 AM, Sébastien de Menten
> On Nov 20, 2017, at 1:37 AM, Sébastien de Menten wrote:
>
> Indeed. But in gnucash guile world, how will scm scripts using the old API
> still work tomorrow ? Or do they need a migration/versioning per gnucash
> version ?
>
> On Nov 20, 2017 06:04, "John Ralls"
Indeed. But in gnucash guile world, how will scm scripts using the old API
still work tomorrow ? Or do they need a migration/versioning per gnucash
version ?
On Nov 20, 2017 06:04, "John Ralls" wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 19, 2017, at 8:28 PM, Sébastien de Menten