Re: Boost/Python

> On Jan 10, 2018, at 7:49 AM, cicko wrote: > > Thanks a lot, John! > I'll read more into this. I'd hope for some sort of wrapper on top of the > already compiled binaries. Was hoping that these Python interfaces would do > something like that. Which makes me wonder why

Re: Beyond 2.8 - version numbering

> On Jan 10, 2018, at 11:00 AM, Geert Janssens > wrote: > > Op donderdag 4 januari 2018 00:23:57 CET schreef Frank H. Ellenberger: >> Am 03.01.2018 um 17:41 schrieb Derek Atkins: >>> I see no reason that we can't jump from 2.7.x to 3.0[.0] when we release. >>> And

Re: Beyond 2.8 - version numbering

Op donderdag 4 januari 2018 00:23:57 CET schreef Frank H. Ellenberger: > Am 03.01.2018 um 17:41 schrieb Derek Atkins: > > I see no reason that we can't jump from 2.7.x to 3.0[.0] when we release. > > And since we DID upgrade to GTK3, I think we should do that. > > +1 How is the upgrade to gtk3

Re: Boost/Python

Thanks a lot, John! I'll read more into this. I'd hope for some sort of wrapper on top of the already compiled binaries. Was hoping that these Python interfaces would do something like that. Which makes me wonder why the bindings currently don't work on Windows. I don't know much about the inner

Re: Boost/Python

> On Jan 10, 2018, at 4:43 AM, Alen Siljak wrote: > > In my quest to call GnuCash functions from Python (or C#), I ran across > Boost.Python > (http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_66_0/libs/python/doc/html/index.html). > > What are the chances that this would work

Boost/Python

In my quest to call GnuCash functions from Python (or C#), I ran across Boost.Python (http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_66_0/libs/python/doc/html/index.html). What are the chances that this would work with GnuCash .dlls on Windows? Has anyone had any experience and willing to share?