> On Apr 7, 2018, at 1:08 PM, Wm via gnucash-devel
> wrote:
>
> On 07/04/2018 19:50, Buddha Buck wrote:
>
> [much snipped]
>
> thanks to JohnR too, BB's message was more fun to reply to
>
;-),
[SNIP]
>>> half for fun is this (.)(.) female breasts, an
> On Apr 7, 2018, at 1:26 PM, Eric Siegerman wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 07:31:38AM -0700, John Ralls wrote:
>>> On Apr 6, 2018, at 11:11 PM, Wm via gnucash-devel
>>> wrote:
>>> gnc 3.0 allows emojis in places I think inappropriate
>
>
On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 07:31:38AM -0700, John Ralls wrote:
> > On Apr 6, 2018, at 11:11 PM, Wm via gnucash-devel
> > wrote:
> > gnc 3.0 allows emojis in places I think inappropriate
In poking at this, I've discovered some inconsistency in the
register's handling of
On 07/04/2018 19:50, Buddha Buck wrote:
[much snipped]
thanks to JohnR too, BB's message was more fun to reply to
On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 2:12 AM Wm via gnucash-devel <
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org> wrote:
Perhaps, but I don't think it is GnuCash's place to dictate that.
Besides, until the
On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 07:31:38AM -0700, John Ralls wrote:
> > On Apr 6, 2018, at 11:11 PM, Wm via gnucash-devel
> > wrote:
> > gnc 3.0 allows emojis in places I think inappropriate
> > account names
> > account codes
> > securities
> Filtering for meaning is Way Too
On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 2:12 AM Wm via gnucash-devel <
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org> wrote:
> background:
>
> gnc 3.0 allows emojis in places I think inappropriate
>
> e.g.
>
> account names
> account codes
> securities
>
I do not think it is GnuCash's place to dictate what is "appropriate" or
not
> On Apr 6, 2018, at 11:11 PM, Wm via gnucash-devel
> wrote:
>
> background:
>
> gnc 3.0 allows emojis in places I think inappropriate
>
> e.g.
>
> account names
> account codes
> securities
>
> and offers them in places it shouldn't
>
> e.g.
>
> dates
>
background:
gnc 3.0 allows emojis in places I think inappropriate
e.g.
account names
account codes
securities
and offers them in places it shouldn't
e.g.
dates
numbers
===
the thing I'm wondering about is if I am totally out of date or just
being realistic.
Argument A: emojis are