> On Jul 23, 2019, at 11:59 AM, Rosi Dimova wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
>> On 23 Jul 2019, at 20:18, John Ralls wrote:
>>
>> That would be *way* out of scope for GnuCash. The only effect on accounting
>> is when the change in ownership of the inventory is booked. Deciding that is
>> completely
Hello,
> On 23 Jul 2019, at 20:18, John Ralls wrote:
>
> That would be *way* out of scope for GnuCash. The only effect on accounting
> is when the change in ownership of the inventory is booked. Deciding that is
> completely external to GnuCash, which doesn't even do cost accounting for WIP
> On Jul 23, 2019, at 6:42 AM, Rosi Dimova via gnucash-devel
> wrote:
>
> Hello developers,
>
> My name is Rosi Dimova and I am the translator of GnuCash into Bulgarian.
> This translation would never become real without the help of my friends -
> Alexander Shopov as an editor and Mila
> On Jul 23, 2019, at 10:11 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
>
>
>> In any case I'd think both owner-report and aging must be consistent.
>
> MAYBE.. But not necessarily. The aging report is more for the
> business, whereas the customer report is designed to actually be sent to
> the customer.
Christopher Lam writes:
> In this case, I think there is a strong argument that credit-notes must be
> ignored in the generation of aging-table? And this would apply for customer/
> job/vendor/employee aging tables, therefore only applying payment using
> credit-note will reduce the balances?
