Man you're saving my life! Thanks!
J.
On 4/28/20 8:54 PM, John Ralls wrote:
On Apr 28, 2020, at 12:25 PM, jeanl wrote:
Devs,
As part of launching the reconcile dialog once the matching is done, I'm
listening to the response signal from the gnc_ofx_importer_gui (in
gnc-ofx-import.c). So
> On Apr 28, 2020, at 12:25 PM, jeanl wrote:
>
> Devs,
> As part of launching the reconcile dialog once the matching is done, I'm
> listening to the response signal from the gnc_ofx_importer_gui (in
> gnc-ofx-import.c). So right before I launch the GNCImportMainMatcher
> gnc_ofx_importer_gui
Please keep in mind that budgets may also be used by people with no
accounting training, like myself, who get overwhelmed by the terms debit
and credit and where each is properly used.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 1:23 PM Adrien Monteleone <
adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net> wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 28,
Hello Geert, After 2 frustrating and unsuccessful attempts to install
development on the Mac, I ended up reverting back to Linux. I have compiled and
ran successfully gnucash on Debian. Do you have a preferred IDE that you use on
Linux?, I haven't used EMACS for almost 15 years and would
Devs,
As part of launching the reconcile dialog once the matching is done, I'm
listening to the response signal from the gnc_ofx_importer_gui (in
gnc-ofx-import.c). So right before I launch the GNCImportMainMatcher
gnc_ofx_importer_gui I connect to its reponse signal:
g_signal_connect (G_OBJECT
> On Apr 28, 2020 w18d119, at 9:27 AM, Geert Janssens
> wrote:
>
> What I take from all this is that as long as you display data in two columns
> (a debit and a credit) you can follow the logic as you suggest.
Most likely, that’s what I thought at first too, but I suppose a notation like
> On Apr 28, 2020, at 7:27 AM, Geert Janssens
> wrote:
>
> However numbers are not just meant for displaying, one needs to do
> calculations on them as
> well. And at that point signs will matter. Whether a certain number increase
> or decrease your
> balance is a matter of sign.
Maybe
Sumit,
That's something I've wanted to find time for as well. I haven't yet examined
the MS STL code, but I expect that it's based on msvcrt rather than llvm's libc
so you'd need to use clang-cl to build a project with it. You'll also need to
compile the boost libraries we use (filesystem,
Op dinsdag 28 april 2020 15:58:30 CEST schreef Adrien Monteleone:
> Geert,
>
> I concur.
>
> As long as the internals treat the equation as set to equal zero, then
> signage is necessary and it should be consistent. I appreciate the efforts
> being made to achieve this.
>
> My (pie in the sky)
Geert,
I concur.
As long as the internals treat the equation as set to equal zero, then signage
is necessary and it should be consistent. I appreciate the efforts being made
to achieve this.
My (pie in the sky) request for consideration is the idea that such a treatment
of the equation is
Op dinsdag 28 april 2020 14:55:07 CEST schreef Stan Brown:
> On 2020-04-27 17:58, John Ralls wrote:
> > The GnuCash development team announces GnuCash 3.902, the first testing
> > release for what will soon be GnuCash 4.0.
> >
> >
> > Baseline requirements
> >
> > Operating Systems:
> > •
My simplistic view on this: if there is going to be confusion anyway, let's at
least make it
consistent.
We have the sign reversal strategies in there to alter gnucash number
presentation behavior. To
me it would make sense this affects normal transactions the same way as it
would reports as
Hi Sumit,
We support Windows 8.1 because this version if Windows is still supported by
Microsoft as well
albeit only for extended support.
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/13853/windows-lifecycle-fact-sheet
Feel free to experiment with clang and MSVC STL. If that can be made to work in
No sorry, Windows builds are generated only for maint (3.1x) and master
(3.9x eventually 4.x) builds. It would be very disruptive for these
branches to receive beta commits and reversals. So, derek's script scans
the beta branch on my github fork daily for any changes, and builds a
flatpak if it
Is there a windows build? I have a linux vm so might be able to test the
flatpak, but windows would be easier
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:52 PM Christopher Lam
wrote:
> Labelling issues aside, is there anyone who would be willing to beta test?
>
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2020, 2:59 am Adrien Monteleone, <
John et al,
I looked through the release notes for 3.90x and noticed the support for
Windows 8.1. Is there a specific reason to keep supporting Windows 8.1? Are
there many users asking for support on Windows 8.1? For reference, Windows 10
was released on Jul 29, 2015.
Selfishly, I want to see
16 matches
Mail list logo