Op maandag 12 december 2011 22:52:06 schreef Alex Aycinena:
I checked out the latest trunk revision 21729 and it builds OK.
However, when I try to start it, I get the following error:
symbol lookup error:
/opt/gnucash-svn/gnucash-working/lib/gnucash/libgncmod-business-core.so:
undefined
On 13-12-11 07:52, David Reiser wrote:
Turns out I got it right in the original post:
[01:45:46] dbr@DOPL6: gnucash $git bisect bad
5f0f67f2d06605b30350a5b38ca0484ae21c49f9 is the first bad commit
commit 5f0f67f2d06605b30350a5b38ca0484ae21c49f9
Author: Geert Janssensjanssens-ge...@telenet.be
On 17-12-11 20:32, John Ralls wrote:
Author: jralls
Date: 2011-12-17 14:32:27 -0500 (Sat, 17 Dec 2011)
New Revision: 21736
Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/21736
Modified:
gnucash/trunk/src/Makefile.am
gnucash/trunk/src/libqof/qof/test/Makefile.am
Log:
Fix circular dependency
On 17-12-11 20:52, David Reiser wrote:
--
David Reiser
dbrei...@earthlink.net
On Dec 17, 2011, at 7:16 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
On 13-12-11 07:52, David Reiser wrote:
Turns out I got it right in the original post:
[01:45:46] dbr@DOPL6: gnucash $git bisect bad
On 18-12-11 22:53, John Ralls wrote:
On Dec 18, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
On 17-12-11 20:32, John Ralls wrote:
Author: jralls
Date: 2011-12-17 14:32:27 -0500 (Sat, 17 Dec 2011)
New Revision: 21736
Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/21736
Modified:
gnucash/trunk
On 18-12-11 23:06, John Ralls wrote:
I just noticed that the Trac magic which converted something like #656565 in a
log message to a link seems not to be working anymore. Did something fall off
when Derek upgraded?
Regards,
John Ralls
Yes, I have noticed this too. It is like this for some
On 19-12-11 01:47, John Ralls wrote:
Author: jralls
Date: 2011-12-18 19:47:20 -0500 (Sun, 18 Dec 2011)
New Revision: 21743
Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/21743
Modified:
gnucash/trunk/src/business/business-gnome/dialog-payment.c
gnucash/trunk/src/engine/Scrub.c
On 19-12-11 12:49, Christian Stimming wrote:
Am Sonntag, 18. Dezember 2011, 14:23:10 schrieb John Ralls:
The plugin directories for gwenyhwfar are looked up in two ways: Firstly
by using the executable's installation location as a starting point
(using binreloc on Unix and GetModuleFileName()
On 20-12-11 09:06, Christian Stimming wrote:
Author: cstim
Date: 2011-12-20 03:06:01 -0500 (Tue, 20 Dec 2011)
New Revision: 21762
Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/21762
Modified:
gnucash/branches/2.4/packaging/win32/weekly_build.sh
Log:
[21761] Win32 build: Switch weekly build to
On 20-12-11 15:53, John Ralls wrote:
On Dec 20, 2011, at 1:10 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
On 20-12-11 09:06, Christian Stimming wrote:
Author: cstim
Date: 2011-12-20 03:06:01 -0500 (Tue, 20 Dec 2011)
New Revision: 21762
Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/21762
Modified:
gnucash
On 20-12-11 22:21, John Ralls wrote:
On Dec 20, 2011, at 11:44 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
Additionally I have just backported two commits from trunk that are needed to
successfully run dist.sh with AqBanking 5.
There's one more note: do you want the nightly build to use AqBanking 5 already
On 21-12-11 03:28, John Ralls wrote:
Author: jralls
Date: 2011-12-20 21:28:48 -0500 (Tue, 20 Dec 2011)
New Revision: 21768
Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/21768
Modified:
gnucash/branches/2.4/packaging/win32/defaults.sh
gnucash/branches/2.4/packaging/win32/install-impl.sh
On 21-12-11 18:44, Geert Janssens wrote:
On 21-12-11 15:43, John Ralls wrote:
I got an msys-1.0.11 installation working on my windows VM yesterday
and got it to go as far as starting Gnucash (I have a link error that
I think is left over from the weekend and a completely different
setup using
Op vrijdag 23 december 2011 21:45:02 schreef John Ralls:
On Dec 22, 2011, at 11:07 PM, John Ralls wrote:
This produced a problem with gettext, but it's too late to investigate
tonight. I'll have a look at it in the morning.
After a bit of a struggle with gettext, goffice, and openSP
Op zaterdag 24 december 2011 08:06:28 schreef John Ralls:
On Dec 24, 2011, at 6:04 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
Op vrijdag 23 december 2011 21:45:02 schreef John Ralls:
On Dec 22, 2011, at 11:07 PM, John Ralls wrote:
This produced a problem with gettext, but it's too late to
investigate
Op dinsdag 27 december 2011 00:18:46 schreef John Ralls:
Well, that didn't actually work out.
There is enough goofiness with MinGW GCC 4.4.0 that I couldn't get it to
link properly in a couple of places, and the one that ultimately kicked my
butt was libgsf-libxml2, where the linker won't
Op dinsdag 27 december 2011 22:09:51 schreef John Ralls:
Jeez, you guys give up *way* too easily! ;-)
I'm glad you're more persistent! ;-)
The problem with SLib turns out to be a Guile bug: ice-9/boot-9/load-modules
determines a absolute path isn't portable, which is why we were seeing the
Op woensdag 28 december 2011 09:09:05 schreef Derek Atkins:
Hi,
On Wed, December 28, 2011 8:36 am, Geert Janssens wrote:
Op dinsdag 27 december 2011 22:09:51 schreef John Ralls:
So with the changes checked in (and a reset.sh), it should build a
working
package... at least, it does here
Op zondag 25 december 2011 10:26:34 schreef John Ralls:
On Dec 25, 2011, at 9:13 AM, John Ralls wrote:
On Nov 28, 2011, at 3:07 PM, John Ralls wrote:
On Nov 28, 2011, at 9:37 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
On maandag 28 november 2011, John Ralls wrote:
On Nov 27, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Geert
Op woensdag 28 december 2011 17:08:13 schreef John Ralls:
Heh, don't underestimate the configuration of our Windows build server.
It checks every night if it has to (re)build some tagged versions. It
does this by making a list of all tags (and their associated revision)
and comparing
Op donderdag 29 december 2011 14:50:56 schreef Christian Stimming:
Author: cstim
Date: 2011-12-29 14:50:56 -0500 (Thu, 29 Dec 2011)
New Revision: 21789
Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/21789
Modified:
gnucash/trunk/packaging/win32/install-impl.sh
Log:
[Win32 build] Enable
Op donderdag 29 december 2011 21:27:45 schreef Geert Janssens:
Op donderdag 29 december 2011 14:50:56 schreef Christian Stimming:
Author: cstim
Date: 2011-12-29 14:50:56 -0500 (Thu, 29 Dec 2011)
New Revision: 21789
Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/21789
Modified
Op vrijdag 30 december 2011 09:06:58 schreef u:
On Dec 30, 2011, at 2:57 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
Op donderdag 29 december 2011 14:18:38 schreef u:
On Dec 29, 2011, at 12:24 PM, Christian Stimming wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 28. Dezember 2011, 18:16:48 schrieb John Ralls:
A release plan isn't
Op vrijdag 30 december 2011 16:40:11 schreef John Ralls:
Author: jralls
Date: 2011-12-30 16:40:11 -0500 (Fri, 30 Dec 2011)
New Revision: 21803
Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/21803
Modified:
gnucash/branches/2.4/packaging/win32/gnucash.iss.in
Log:
Fix guile load path for
Op zaterdag 31 december 2011 04:22:00 schreef Geert Janssens:
Author: gjanssens
Date: 2011-12-31 04:21:57 -0500 (Sat, 31 Dec 2011)
New Revision: 21806
Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/21806
Modified:
gnucash/branches/2.4/src/gnome-utils/gnc-file.c
Log:
Add a features table
Op vrijdag 30 december 2011 19:44:50 schreef John Ralls:
On Dec 30, 2011, at 5:17 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
What about backporting the feature table patch?
Oh, did you commit that to trunk? I thought you'd done it direct to 2.4. If
you don't beat me to it, I'll backport it tomorrow.
Op donderdag 29 december 2011 21:43:43 schreef Geert Janssens:
Your commit went in just ahead of mine regarding libxslt building.
Just for your information, libxslt doesn't build natively either due to
a
missing iconv.h include file. I fixed the build by adding GNOME_CPPFLAGS
Op vrijdag 30 december 2011 15:18:30 schreef John Ralls:
As you can see, it's allocating a string on the heap and returning it, so
either the strings are already getting freed or we're already leaking them.
So I went ahead and built swig with the patch from the bug and gave it a
spin. It
Op zaterdag 31 december 2011 15:29:37 schreef John Ralls:
The problem is that like most unix programs, guile hardcodes its
installation prefix into the binary and generally expects to find
everything it needs relative to that prefix for ever after. For loading
modules, that can be overridden
On 01/10/2012 01:50 AM, John Ralls wrote:
On Jan 8, 2012, at 8:43 PM, John Ralls wrote:
On Jan 8, 2012, at 3:21 PM, John Ralls wrote:
On Jan 8, 2012, at 1:20 PM, Christian Stimming wrote:
Great!!! Thanks, John, for tracking down this mysterious and worrysome bug
for all of our SQL
On 01/10/2012 02:17 PM, Mike Evans wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:17:54 +0300
Reuben Cummingsreub...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Derek Atkinswarl...@mit.edu
wrote:
John Rallsjra...@ceridwen.us writes:
On Jan 9, 2012, at 4:26 AM, Reuben Cummings wrote:
I didn't
Op donderdag 12 januari 2012 05:51:45 schreef Phil Longstaff:
There are a number of longer term projects, among them Gtk3 and engine
cleanup. I've been distracted by other matters but can now devote some
time to Gnucash. From what I can tell, John Ralls has been pushing the
engine work (unit
Op donderdag 12 januari 2012 14:33:32 schreef Derek Atkins:
Hi,
On Thu, January 12, 2012 2:29 pm, Phil Longstaff wrote:
I hadn't seen GSettings before. Interesting. I had come up with
gnc_prefs object system which seems to work in a similar manner to
GSettings. GSettings also allows
Op zaterdag 21 januari 2012 07:20:55 schreef Mike Evans:
Author: mikee
Date: 2012-01-21 07:20:55 -0500 (Sat, 21 Jan 2012)
New Revision: 21870
Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/21870
Removed:
gnucash/trunk/src/plugins/bi_import/bi_import.c
Op zaterdag 21 januari 2012 13:07:21 schreef Mike Evans:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:37:42 +0100
Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote:
Op zaterdag 21 januari 2012 07:20:55 schreef Mike Evans:
Author: mikee
Date: 2012-01-21 07:20:55 -0500 (Sat, 21 Jan 2012)
New Revision: 21870
Op zondag 22 januari 2012 22:12:15 schreef Christian Stimming:
Mike,
Am Samstag, 21. Januar 2012, 07:20:50 schrieb Mike Evans:
Author: mikee
Date: 2012-01-21 07:20:49 -0500 (Sat, 21 Jan 2012)
New Revision: 21869
Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/21869
Modified:
Op zondag 22 januari 2012 20:26:43 schreef Colin Law:
The stable version warning is really written for trunk, and 2.4.4 was
the last release made from trunk before we branched 2.4 so we could
work on other stuff in trunk. Not that anyone has bothered to update
the message in trunk,
Op maandag 23 januari 2012 12:35:48 schreef Derek Atkins:
Geert Janssens gjanss...@code.gnucash.org writes:
Modified:
gnucash/branches/2.4/src/bin/gnucash-bin.c
Log:
Update stable gnucash version reported in Development warning
Modified: gnucash/branches/2.4/src/bin/gnucash
Op dinsdag 24 januari 2012 08:18:10 schreef Colin Law:
On 23 January 2012 02:44, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
...
Yes, that's normally what that message means. Try setting
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/libglade/2.0 and see if it at least gives you
a different error.
I tried setting
Op dinsdag 24 januari 2012 10:24:02 schreef Derek Atkins:
Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be writes:
Op maandag 23 januari 2012 12:35:48 schreef Derek Atkins:
Geert Janssens gjanss...@code.gnucash.org writes:
Modified:
gnucash/branches/2.4/src/bin/gnucash-bin.c
Log
Op donderdag 26 januari 2012 15:34:32 schreef Colin Law:
On 25 January 2012 16:54, Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com wrote:
It seems I have been barking up the wrong tree here. I have built the
trunk from git and it runs fine, without setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
Moreover if I remove
Op donderdag 26 januari 2012 15:34:32 schreef Colin Law:
On 25 January 2012 16:54, Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com wrote:
It seems I have been barking up the wrong tree here. I have built the
trunk from git and it runs fine, without setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
Moreover if I remove
Op vrijdag 27 januari 2012 15:45:04 schreef Manfred Usselmann:
Am 26.01.2012 21:25, schrieb Christian Stimming:
Am Donnerstag, 26. Januar 2012, 05:51:06 schrieb AshokR:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-summer-of-code-announce Google
Summer
of Code 2012 should be announced soon . Are
Op donderdag 26 januari 2012 22:42:20 schreef Derek Atkins:
Author: warlord
Date: 2012-01-26 22:42:20 -0500 (Thu, 26 Jan 2012)
New Revision: 21892
Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/21892
Added:
gnucash/tags/2.4.10/
Log:
Tagging the 2.4.10 release
Unfortunately, this tag is
Op vrijdag 27 januari 2012 12:35:33 schreef John Ralls:
On Jan 27, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Geert Janssens wrote:
Op donderdag 26 januari 2012 22:42:20 schreef Derek Atkins:
Author: warlord
Date: 2012-01-26 22:42:20 -0500 (Thu, 26 Jan 2012)
New Revision: 21892
Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org
Op zondag 29 januari 2012 17:15:59 schreef Clint Redwood:
Hi,
I've put the 2.2.9 working report in the standard reports folder and when
loading standard reports, the splash screen disappears and the whole thing
dies.
I've not as of yet found any log file that's being written to with an
Op zondag 15 januari 2012 09:31:24 schreef Cristian Marchi:
That was my concern: if this kind of patch is considered translation
related. If so, I assume that the changes that I applied in the
accounts folder of the 2.4 branch will be also merged in the trunk
branch when this will happen for
Op vrijdag 27 januari 2012 11:05:38 schreef Colin Law:
On 27 January 2012 08:33, Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 27 January 2012 06:07, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
On Jan 26, 2012, at 2:04 PM, Colin Law wrote:
...
Unless anyone has any good ideas I am going to leave it
Op zondag 29 januari 2012 21:48:08 schreef Colin Law:
On 29 January 2012 20:24, Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote:
Op vrijdag 27 januari 2012 11:05:38 schreef Colin Law:
...
I had a look at the packaged version of gnucash in the Ubuntu 12.04
repository and realised
Op vrijdag 3 februari 2012 13:15:32 schreef rbibr...@t-online.de:
Hello,
as reported in one of my earlier mails I have build a working gnucash
(opensuse 12.1, guile 2). but starting a report is still impossible.
Today I tried it again in the console and got this message:
ERROR: In
Op vrijdag 3 februari 2012 08:16:23 schreef Mike Evans:
Author: mikee
Date: 2012-02-03 08:16:23 -0500 (Fri, 03 Feb 2012)
New Revision: 21930
Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/21930
Modified:
gnucash/trunk/src/report/business-reports/invoice.scm
Log:
Restore missing
Op zaterdag 28 januari 2012 08:46:45 schreef John Ralls:
OK, if it's crashing for you on XP, maybe it will for me too. I'll have a
look in a bit.
Regards,
John Ralls
I finally got some more information on this problem. I found a relevant
gnucash.trace. I don't know why I didn't find this
Op zaterdag 4 februari 2012 17:24:07 schreef John Ralls:
Might not be necessary:
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/commit/gdk/win32/gdkpixmap-win32.c?h=gtk-2
-24id=ba8c4bb049b36b3707c2c8f22c5c66b497e2d2cf
Gtk_-2.24.9 just got released last week. I'll blind-change defaults.sh to
use it in a
:36:58 +0100
Subject: Re: guile-2.0
From: Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be
This is also where I stranded so far on Fedora 16, with test packages
for
Guile 2.0 installed.
My guile knowledge is too limited to understand this well. The gnucash
code
has a definition for the hash-table
Op zondag 12 februari 2012 13:30:03 schreef Colin Law:
On 12 February 2012 12:32, David G. Hamblen dhamb...@roadrunner.com wrote:
I just tried a git pull and I don't see a 2.4.10 tag. Git tags are
there up through 2.4.9. User error?
I am not seeing it either. I know there have been
Op maandag 13 februari 2012 09:24:27 schreef Casey Cichon:
Hey all,
I'm getting the following error when trying to compile the latest trunk (git
pulled this morning).
make[5]: Entering directory `/home/casey/Downloads/gnucash/src/engine'
/bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile
Op maandag 13 februari 2012 14:49:09 schreef Derek Atkins:
Geert Janssens gjanss...@code.gnucash.org writes:
Author: gjanssens
Date: 2012-02-13 10:02:24 -0500 (Mon, 13 Feb 2012)
New Revision: 22018
Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/22018
Modified:
gnucash/trunk/src
Op dinsdag 14 februari 2012 09:26:18 schreef Derek Atkins:
Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be writes:
Op maandag 13 februari 2012 14:49:09 schreef Derek Atkins:
Actually, it would be nice to continue having a return percentage in
addition to a return amount.
Can you add
Op woensdag 15 februari 2012 08:08:45 schreef Ted Creedon:
I'm closing out my Mom's trust and a complete set GnuCash reports for
2005-2011 was included in the distribution agreement signed by all the
beneficiaries.
Worked great, reviewed by 3 tax attorneys.
Tedc
Trustee
Thanks for
Op vrijdag 17 februari 2012 12:52:15 schreef Reuben Cummings:
I wrote a script to import invoices and payments into the gnucash
database. It seems to work ok but in the accounts payable register,
the 'Type' column displays '?' instead of 'P' or 'I'. Is there a
setting in the database that
Op vrijdag 17 februari 2012 15:44:00 schreef Reuben Cummings:
On Feb 17, 2012, at 1:32 PM, Geert Janssens wrote:
Op vrijdag 17 februari 2012 12:52:15 schreef Reuben Cummings:
It is for example not clear to me what you are trying to achieve
exactly. I read that you want to import invoices
Op vrijdag 17 februari 2012 09:32:14 schreef karmicads:
¨And in the process produce tons more rough.¨
And you blame *ME* for your inability to find gems Derek?
All bad tradesmen blame their tools. Not that Iḿ a tool or anything. LOL.
¨Try limiting yourself to 2-5 sentences per point?¨
Op vrijdag 2 maart 2012 09:05:21 schreef John Ralls:
The M$Win is tied to ActiveState; I don't know how they do things or how to
make a ppm,.
Just a sidenote here: although not officially endorsed by GnuCash, Stawberry
perl can equally well be used to run F::Q from within GnuCash. I recently
On 13-04-12 22:32, Christian Stimming wrote:
Am Freitag, 13. April 2012, 21:48:37 schrieb Christian Stimming:
Currently, SVN trunk requires libgtk-2.18.1. However, recently (in r22086
from patches in bug#672161) some new code was added that uses functions
that were introduced in gtk-2.22, e.g.
On 13-04-12 22:32, Christian Stimming wrote:
Am Freitag, 13. April 2012, 21:48:37 schrieb Christian Stimming:
Currently, SVN trunk requires libgtk-2.18.1. However, recently (in r22086
from patches in bug#672161) some new code was added that uses functions
that were introduced in gtk-2.22, e.g.
Hi,
I have just committed a couple of patches that should allow the Windows
build to use a git repository as its source. I started from Christian's
original work and tweaked it a bit to avoid the sed segfault we had before.
Parameters to set in custom.sh are:
REPOS_TYPE=git
(default value is
On 03-05-12 11:49, Wm Tarr wrote:
While reading a recent thread here (the one on libgtk dependency) I
wondered which OS gnc ended up on most.
Looking at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gnucash/files/gnucash%20%28stable%29/stats/os?dates=2012-02-06%20to%202012-05-03
(i.e. 2.4.10 stable until
On 04-05-12 11:50, Tiago Neiva wrote:
Hello all!
I resumed working on the PT translation, and downloaded the 2.4.10. I
had no issues compiling it on ubuntu 12.04.
I noticed that the menu accelerators in menu itens containing an
ampersand () as in Check Repair are displayed as _Check
Repair
I have just pushed a fix for bug 67132 [1] where not all parameters of
recurrences were saved to sql.
This fix would probably be very easy to backport to 2.4.x.
However, the patch involves updating the table definition for the
recurrence table (a column is added for the parameter that wasn't
Thanks all for the feedback.
On 22-06-12 09:46, John Ralls wrote:
On Jun 22, 2012, at 8:09 AM, David Carlsoncarlson...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Gentlemen,
What would Releases 2.4.10 and previous do if they encounter an unfamiliar
format? Do they throw an error that the file needs an updated
On 22-06-12 15:15, Derek Atkins wrote:
Question: Is there going to be a 2.4.11?
I have been wondering about that as well recently. In my opinion that
would be a good thing to do for several reasons:
- There are a number of translation updates on the 2.4 branch
- There are a few backported
On 22-06-12 17:29, John Ralls wrote:
The SQL backend doesn't ever look at the table version, just writes
it. The same is true of GNUCASH_RESAVE_VERSION. The only mechanism
that stops loading an updated database would seem to be in the XML
backend. Seems Phil and I wrote the first part (store
On 22-06-12 18:11, Mike Alexander wrote:
On Jun 22, 2012, at 4:41 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
I wasn't very awake apparently yesterday when I wrote my first message. David's
mail triggered me to actually *test* how 2.4.10 would react on the new data
format:
- It opens the file without any
On 22-06-12 19:01, John Ralls wrote:
On Jun 22, 2012, at 5:43 PM, Geert Janssensjanssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote:
On 22-06-12 18:11, Mike Alexander wrote:
On Jun 22, 2012, at 4:41 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
I wasn't very awake apparently yesterday when I wrote my first message. David's
mail
On 25-06-12 18:32, Derek Atkins wrote:
Geert Janssensjanssens-ge...@telenet.be writes:
On 22-06-12 15:15, Derek Atkins wrote:
Question: Is there going to be a 2.4.11?
I have been wondering about that as well recently. In my opinion that
would be a good thing to do for several reasons:
-
On 26-06-12 15:48, Tiago Neiva wrote:
I posted a bug about accelerator keys in 2.4.10 on Ubuntu and Colin posted
it in Ubuntu bug tracking system.
It was a bug in the libdbusmenu package, a proposed fixed was released
today and it solves the issue.
Thanks for informing us.
Did you close the
Ah, ok. I read your message as if you created a bug report for GnuCash
and Colin created one for Ubuntu.
No further actions required then.
Geert
On 26-06-12 18:04, Tiago Neiva wrote:
The bug report was only posted in ubuntu, as far as I know,
In Ubuntu it is being handled, the fix is only in
On 26-06-12 19:28, John Ralls wrote:
From: Geert Janssensgjanss...@code.gnucash.org
To: gnucash-patc...@gnucash.org
Subject: r22240 - gnucash/branches/2.4/src/app-utils - Fix a double
free crash when the required features dialog is shown
Applied in trunk and 2.4. Thank you for the patch.
Geert
On 27-06-12 19:18, Bill Nottingham wrote:
When making the text file tips-of-the-day, GnuCash expects 'gcc -E' to
preserve at least one of the whitespace lines between entries. However, this
relies on behavior of 'gcc -E' that isn't
GnuCash 2.4.10 was released in February, now almost 5 months ago.
There have been several commits since then on the 2.4 branch, consisting
of translation updates and bugfixes. So I would propose to release a new
stable version in the near future.
What do others think ?
Geert
On 29-06-12 18:05, John Ralls wrote:
On Jun 29, 2012, at 4:26 PM, Geert Janssens wrote:
GnuCash 2.4.10 was released in February, now almost 5 months ago.
There have been several commits since then on the 2.4 branch, consisting of
translation updates and bugfixes. So I would propose
On 10-07-12 10:23, John Ralls wrote:
OK. Has anyone run distcheck to make sure that we have a clean tree?
I'm not presently in a position to do that, but I will be on Friday
(the 13th ;-) ). If everything's clean on Friday we'll have a release
on Saturday. Regards, John Ralls
I tried to run
Hello Hisham,
Nobody seems to have given feedback to your designs so far, so here is mine.
Disclaimer: I'm a developer with interest in design, but not a designer.
As such I consider my authority on design matters limited.
Before moving on to the designs, I'd like to add some comments to
The last commit in svn is r22278, committed by me two days ago. On
github however, the most recent commit is 22277, committed by me just
before.
Because of this I can't push my most recent patches via git svn dcommit.
Can anybody with the proper access to the sync infrastructure check
what's
On 03-08-12 23:46, Frank H. Ellenberger wrote:
Hoi Geert,
Am 03.08.2012 16:29, schrieb Geert Janssens:
The last commit in svn is r22278, committed by me two days ago. On
github however, the most recent commit is 22277, committed by me just
before.
:
I was just wondering if some of your
On 03-08-12 17:36, John Ralls wrote:
He's looking ;-)
I ran the update manually a few minutes ago, so your change from
yesterday is in Github.
The automatic updates have been having trouble since July 16th, with
the following errors:
Jul 29 00:31:04 jeeves Gnucash_knocker[5621]: Processing
On 05-08-12 16:49, Geert Janssens wrote:
On 03-08-12 17:36, John Ralls wrote:
He's looking ;-)
I ran the update manually a few minutes ago, so your change from
yesterday is in Github.
The automatic updates have been having trouble since July 16th, with
the following errors:
Jul 29 00:31:04
On 07-08-12 17:57, John Ralls wrote:
On Aug 7, 2012, at 7:53 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
At least I'm giving you plenty of opportunity to test ;) I've got another set
of patches waiting for the sync to happen before I can svn dcommit them.
I hope you can sort this out soon. If there's anything
On 10-08-12 15:54, John Ralls wrote:
On Aug 10, 2012, at 5:22 AM, reubano reub...@gmail.com wrote:
So according to the wiki[1] should we follow directions for Non-Committers
or Committers? I would think the best option would be to clone and then
submit pull requests but I'm not sure if things
the register gets production ready. So I have just
regenerated that file to include them.
Geert
On 09-08-12 22:18, Alex Aycinena wrote:
Geert,
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Geert Janssens
gjanss...@code.gnucash.org wrote:
Author: gjanssens
Date: 2012-08-07 13:24:33 -0400 (Tue, 07 Aug 2012)
New
: error:
'tnode' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=uninitialized]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Frank
Am 09.08.2012 22:18, schrieb Alex Aycinena:
Geert,
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Geert Janssens
gjanss...@code.gnucash.org wrote:
Author: gjanssens
Date: 2012
On 11-08-12 10:32, Reuben Cummings wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Frank H. Ellenberger
frank.h.ellenber...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Reuben,
Am 11.08.2012 09:55, schrieb Reuben Cummings:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Frank H. Ellenberger
frank.h.ellenber...@gmail.com wrote:
:
On 11-08-12 11:24, Geert Janssens wrote:
Many things have been said already about migrating from svn to git on
the lists. I'll try to summarize what has been mostly agreed upon and
the current status (as I remember it). Others can voice their opinion
if they don't agree with me here:
I think
I have created a wiki page to track the progress of our git migration.
It currently lists the things I know that still have to be done. Please
add to it if you know more or have fixed some items:
http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Github_Migration
Geert
On 11-08-12 12:48, Frank H. Ellenberger wrote:
Hoi,
Am 11.08.2012 12:17, schrieb Geert Janssens:
I have created a wiki page to track the progress of our git migration.
It currently lists the things I know that still have to be done. Please
add to it if you know more or have fixed some items
I have just added some scripts to run an automated build from git
instead of svn.
I copied the svn behaviour as closely as possible. While doing so I got
to question parts of the general setup we promote [1]. The guidelines
state that the contents of packaging/win32 should be copied locally,
On 11-08-12 17:54, Derek Atkins wrote:
Geert,
I think there are two different types of builders: the automated builder,
and a developer.
The automated builder is always going to want to build the most recent
changeset on any particular branch, and it's going to want to be able to
update the
Just FYI,
I ran the modified daily_build_git.sh on the build server (and directly
from the cloned git repo as well instead of using a separate packaging
directory).
The build was successfully built and uploaded. So that's one step closer
to git migration.
I think we should now come to an
On 11-08-12 20:36, Derek Atkins wrote
Any chance we could rename this Git Migration instead of Github
Migration? I don't think we will ever full migrate fully to github. I
just think it's a bad idea to let go of master.
(I tried sending a message like this this morning but it doesn't appear
On 13-08-12 11:33, reubano wrote:
reubano wrote
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Derek Atkins lt;warl...@mit.edugt;
wrote:
Reuben Cummings lt;reub...@gmail.comgt; writes:
Gnucash is following the Gnome patch submission practice. Gnome uses git,
but not Github, and
doesn't use pull requests
901 - 1000 of 2731 matches
Mail list logo
