Re: [GNC-dev] [GNC] GnuCash 3.2 Released

2018-07-11 Thread John Ralls
> On Jul 11, 2018, at 1:03 PM, Wm via gnucash-devel > wrote: > > On 11/07/2018 03:49, John Ralls wrote: >>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 6:45 PM, Wm wrote: > >>> Aside: is there a reason why version changes aren't on (or easily found >>> from) the front page of gnucash.org? they used to be there.

Re: [GNC-dev] [GNC] GnuCash 3.2 Released

2018-07-11 Thread D via gnucash-devel
On July 11, 2018, at 4:04 PM, Wm via gnucash-devel wrote: >On 11/07/2018 03:49, John Ralls wrote: >> >> >>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 6:45 PM, Wm wrote: >>> Aside: is there a reason why version changes aren't on (or easily found >>> from) the front pageĀ  of gnucash.org? they used to be there.

Re: [GNC-dev] [GNC] GnuCash 3.2 Released

2018-07-11 Thread Wm via gnucash-devel
On 11/07/2018 03:49, John Ralls wrote: On Jul 10, 2018, at 6:45 PM, Wm wrote: Aside: is there a reason why version changes aren't on (or easily found from) the front page of gnucash.org? they used to be there. David T. thought that it made the front page too busy and moved it to

Re: [GNC-dev] [GNC] GnuCash 3.2 Released

2018-07-10 Thread John Ralls
> On Jul 10, 2018, at 6:45 PM, Wm wrote: > > On 29/06/2018 08:43, Geert Janssens wrote: >> Op donderdag 28 juni 2018 22:11:49 CEST schreef Dennis West: >>> I'm sure you like to get feedback from someone with absolutely no >>> problems at all. >>> >>> I was using 2.6.21 on my primary computer

Re: [GNC-dev] [GNC] GnuCash 3.2 Released

2018-07-10 Thread Wm
On 29/06/2018 08:43, Geert Janssens wrote: Op donderdag 28 juni 2018 22:11:49 CEST schreef Dennis West: I'm sure you like to get feedback from someone with absolutely no problems at all. I was using 2.6.21 on my primary computer and testing 3.1/3.2 on my standby testbed (both on Win 10.1803).

Re: [GNC-dev] [GNC] GnuCash 3.2 Released

2018-06-29 Thread Geert Janssens
Op donderdag 28 juni 2018 22:11:49 CEST schreef Dennis West: > I'm sure you like to get feedback from someone with absolutely no > problems at all. > > I was using 2.6.21 on my primary computer and testing 3.1/3.2 on my > standby testbed (both on Win 10.1803). I finally decided to take the >