Thanks a lot, Geert! This is just for my own amusement at the moment, and
potentially for filing bugs if I run into any issues on my system. I hope to
have time to try it out sometime this week.
--
Sent from: http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/GnuCash-Dev-f1435356.html
Op zondag 20 januari 2019 13:11:31 CET schreef cicko:
> Great! Could you point me to where I can find these, please? I'm happy to
> try them out.
>
The beta for the nightly builds flatpak repository lives here:
https://code.gnucash.org/builds/flatpak/repo
The public key used to sign the flatpaks
Great! Could you point me to where I can find these, please? I'm happy to try
them out.
--
Sent from: http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/GnuCash-Dev-f1435356.html
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
It is now closed since the AppImage is there and there are ongoing
>> efforts in getting an official Flatpak image.
>>
>>> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2019 at 6:34 PM
>>> From: "Derek Atkins"
>>> To: cicko
>>> Cc: gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
&g
y 11, 2019 at 6:34 PM
>> From: "Derek Atkins"
>> To: cicko
>> Cc: gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
>> Subject: Re: [GNC-dev] AppImage
>>
>> For the record, we are working on getting a Flatpak build done locally.
>> It's on my to-do to set up a "nightly&q
"Derek Atkins"
> To: cicko
> Cc: gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
> Subject: Re: [GNC-dev] AppImage
>
> For the record, we are working on getting a Flatpak build done locally.
> It's on my to-do to set up a "nightly" build.
> -derek
>
> cicko writes:
>
&
Michael,
"Fross, Michael" writes:
> Hello Derek,
>
> Is the goal to have a Flatpak image be part of the standard release process?
> By this I mean to say, will there be a Flatpak build released with the windows
> and mac builds upon a new release?
>
> I think that would be a great addition and
Hello Derek,
Is the goal to have a Flatpak image be part of the standard release
process? By this I mean to say, will there be a Flatpak build released
with the windows and mac builds upon a new release?
I think that would be a great addition and help ease a lot of the build
challenges Linux
For the record, we are working on getting a Flatpak build done locally.
It's on my to-do to set up a "nightly" build.
-derek
cicko writes:
> Someone actually created an AppImage repo for GnuCash at
> https://github.com/ecmu/gnucash.AppImage
>
> It seems pretty fresh. The release available there
Someone actually created an AppImage repo for GnuCash at
https://github.com/ecmu/gnucash.AppImage
It seems pretty fresh. The release available there is 3.4. The title says
"Continuous Build", and it builds to the latest (.tar.gz) released sources.
It looks a bit funny, probably minor GTK issues.
John Ralls-2 wrote
> None of the core devs have had time to look into application bundles for
> Linux. Since the Windows and Mac bundles also have pretty much all of the
> dependency libraries and associated data in them I imagine that a Flatpack
> or similar would run to about the same size,
FYI,
There is already a Flatpak and a Snap available, but it looks like both are
still at 2.6.x
https://flathub.org/apps/details/org.gnucash.GnuCash
https://snapcraft.io/gnucash-jz
I don’t see a size on the Flatpak, but the Snap is a tad under 111MB.
Interestingly, the .dmg went from ≈112MB
> On May 10, 2018, at 2:42 PM, cicko wrote:
>
> I just learned a bit more about application packages (AppImage, Snap,
> Flatpak) on Linux after downloading KeePassXC image and find them quite
> convenient.
> Nabble does not find anything if I search for AppImage so I'd
I just learned a bit more about application packages (AppImage, Snap,
Flatpak) on Linux after downloading KeePassXC image and find them quite
convenient.
Nabble does not find anything if I search for AppImage so I'd like to see
you opinion about using one of these for distributing Linux version
14 matches
Mail list logo