On Wed, May 23, 2018 10:42 am, Geert Janssens wrote:
> Op woensdag 23 mei 2018 16:00:57 CEST schreef John Ralls:
>>
>> I think that it’s premature to break up GnuCash. That will only confuse
>> users. +1 for separating Docs, Website, and Packaging, i.e.
>> gnucash-on-(windows|osx).
>
> Agreed and
On Wed, May 23, 2018 12:51 pm, Adrien Monteleone wrote:
>
> If creating a product for ‘Website’ would a ‘Wiki’, ‘Mailman’ and and dare
> I say, ’GnuCash-Bugzilla’ products section also be in order? (the last
> being not for the software, but for the GnuCash instance of it)
I don't think so.
The
> On May 23, 2018, at 7:28 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
>> However as we host bugzilla at gnucash.org, it should be
>> obvious the database is about gnucash.
>> So perhaps we can reuse the product field for a more useful
>> separation of bugs
>> How about having "Gnucash" for
Op woensdag 23 mei 2018 16:00:57 CEST schreef John Ralls:
> >>> I am a heavy user of the browse page. On gnomebz this had plenty of
> >>>
> >>> statistics on a product. There are all gone. Is this because I'm not
> >>> yet known as a developer or was this a gnome customization ?
> >>
> >> That's
> On May 23, 2018, at 6:29 AM, Geert Janssens
> wrote:
>
> Op woensdag 23 mei 2018 14:28:06 CEST schreef Derek Atkins:
>>> However as we host bugzilla at gnucash.org, it should be
>>>
>>> obvious the database is about gnucash.
>>>
>>> So perhaps we can reuse the
Op woensdag 23 mei 2018 14:28:06 CEST schreef Derek Atkins:
> > However as we host bugzilla at gnucash.org, it should be
> >
> > obvious the database is about gnucash.
> >
> > So perhaps we can reuse the product field for a more useful
> >
> > separation of bugs
> >
> > How about having
Geert sent a bunch of comments about BZ to IRC. I am forwarding them
here and responding for posterity (and a wider audience).
> jralls, warlord: I finally have some time now to look at the
> bugzilla migration. I'll add my thoughts here as I go along
> First thing: when clicking on the