On 09/02/2019 04:05, Christopher Lam wrote:
Well I've been schooled.
Please refresh and try again.
The headers should match the desired report *post* reconciliation.
The transactions reported are: uncleared, cleared, and reconciliation
whereby split-reconciliation-date = account's
On 2/10/19 5:58 PM, Christopher Lam wrote:
> Hi
>
> It does seem that the account balances in the header are now exactly
> as the accountant suggests, except for cosmetic changes.
Yup.
>
> I'd still state that the current iteration of reconcile report,
> summarising the recently reconciled
Hi
It does seem that the account balances in the header are now exactly as the
accountant suggests, except for cosmetic changes.
I'd still state that the current iteration of reconcile report, summarising
the recently reconciled transactions, and the effect they had on the
balances, required
On 2/10/19 9:48 AM, John Ralls wrote:
>
>> On Feb 10, 2019, at 9:16 AM, Stephen M. Butler wrote:
>>
>> On 2/8/19 8:05 PM, Christopher Lam wrote:
>>> Well I've been schooled.
>>>
>> Mea Culpa.
>>
>> This morning the in-house accountant gave me another lecture. Seems
>> I've been using the term
On 2/8/19 8:05 PM, Christopher Lam wrote:
>
> Well I've been schooled.
>
Mea Culpa.
This morning the in-house accountant gave me another lecture. Seems
I've been using the term 'Journal Voucher' to be equivalent of GnC's
Transaction. Just learned that JV is only for adjusting entries (such
as
Well I've been schooled.
Please refresh and try again.
The headers should match the desired report *post* reconciliation.
The transactions reported are: uncleared, cleared, and reconciliation
whereby split-reconciliation-date = account's last-reconciliation-date.
On 9/2/19 10:19 am, Steve
> On Feb 8, 2019, at 5:52 PM, Christopher Lam wrote:
>
> On 9/2/19 7:49 am, Stephen M. Butler wrote:
>> On 2/8/19 5:12 AM, Christopher Lam wrote:
>>> I've been experimenting and I think there's a logic error in your
>>> thinking -- *during* reconciliation, until it's complete, all
>>>
Sorry for top posting. Checked the transaction report items. One is
Reconciled Date. That date matches the bank statement date on which it
was reconciled.
How does that report get that date per transaction if the field doesn't
exist?
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019, 17:52 Christopher Lam On 9/2/19 7:49
On 9/2/19 7:49 am, Stephen M. Butler wrote:
On 2/8/19 5:12 AM, Christopher Lam wrote:
I've been experimenting and I think there's a logic error in your
thinking -- *during* reconciliation, until it's complete, all
'reconciled' transactions are labelled 'cleared'. Reconciled
transactions are, so
On 2/8/19 5:12 AM, Christopher Lam wrote:
>
> I've been experimenting and I think there's a logic error in your
> thinking -- *during* reconciliation, until it's complete, all
> 'reconciled' transactions are labelled 'cleared'. Reconciled
> transactions are, so to speak, gone and don't need to be
I've been experimenting and I think there's a logic error in your
thinking -- *during* reconciliation, until it's complete, all
'reconciled' transactions are labelled 'cleared'. Reconciled
transactions are, so to speak, gone and don't need to be shown on a
reconciliation report.
My
Unfortunately it's very difficult to understand the target report.
It would be much better to have a tiny test datafile - 10 amounts per
account, of various reconciliation states.
I suggest a test datafile as follows:
1. BANK
* 01-jan-19 $1.00 reconciled
* 03-jan-19 $10.00 reconciled
*
On 2/6/19 10:04 PM, Christopher Lam wrote:
> Ok please refresh and try again.
>
> P.S. when all's finalised, we'd love some help in writing
> documentation for the reconciliation report :)
Aha! Tech writer I am not -- but I've done a bunch of it over the years
so can lend a hand.
I have
Ok please refresh and try again.
P.S. when all's finalised, we'd love some help in writing documentation
for the reconciliation report :)
On 7/2/19 1:50 am, Stephen M. Butler wrote:
On 2/6/19 6:40 AM, Christopher Lam wrote:
On 5/2/19 2:37 am, Stephen M. Butler wrote:
Column recap:
Account
On 2/6/19 6:40 AM, Christopher Lam wrote:
> On 5/2/19 2:37 am, Stephen M. Butler wrote:
>> Column recap:
>> Account -- account name as now shown. Allow option to get the full name.
>> Reconcile-Dt -- Date of most recent reconciliation for the account.
>> Most likely will be today or very recent.
On 5/2/19 2:37 am, Stephen M. Butler wrote:
Column recap:
Account -- account name as now shown. Allow option to get the full name.
Reconcile-Dt -- Date of most recent reconciliation for the account.
Most likely will be today or very recent.
Starting -- Sum of all reconciled transactions for
On 2/5/19 9:13 AM, Stephen M. Butler wrote:
> On 2/4/19 11:56 PM, Christopher Lam wrote:
>> Thanks! And a report example as well as the options to be specified too?
> Before doing any reconciliation -- Pre-Reconciled.html
>
> Reconciled Checking, Savings, Money Market, and Cit Credit card to
On 2/4/19 11:56 PM, Christopher Lam wrote:
> Thanks! And a report example as well as the options to be specified too?
Before doing any reconciliation -- Pre-Reconciled.html
Reconciled Checking, Savings, Money Market, and Cit Credit card to 1/31/2019
Then produced Post-Reconciled.html
The only
Thanks! And a report example as well as the options to be specified too?
On Tue., 5 Feb. 2019, 08:54 Stephen M. Butler On 2/4/19 2:56 PM, Christopher Lam wrote:
> > Thank you for detailed algorithm. I'll see about that over next week.
> Yup. A lot of work there.
> >
> > We may have to limit
On 2/4/19 2:56 PM, Christopher Lam wrote:
> Thank you for detailed algorithm. I'll see about that over next week.
Yup. A lot of work there.
>
> We may have to limit the report to one account for various reasons,
> but will try avoid this.
I could work with that. But a bank statement might
Thank you for detailed algorithm. I'll see about that over next week.
We may have to limit the report to one account for various reasons, but
will try avoid this.
If you have the time and inclination, a test datafile, with crafted but
realistic amounts, is very welcome. Perhaps about 10
Some additional thoughts.
In the summary listing at the top of the report, in addition to the
last-reconcile-date and fixing the existing amount columns, add one
final column which is the account ending balance (which should match the
check register or sum of all check registers for that account).
On 2/3/19 3:35 AM, Christopher Lam wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen
>
> If possible I'd be grateful if you would check my branch
> maint-scheme-progress
>
> * cd gnucash
> * git fetch --all
> * git checkout chris/maint-scheme-progress
> * dpkg etc (note there will be gnc-date error - ignore)
>
> Main
Hi Stephen
If possible I'd be grateful if you would check my branch
maint-scheme-progress
* cd gnucash
* git fetch --all
* git checkout chris/maint-scheme-progress
* dpkg etc (note there will be gnc-date error - ignore)
Main issues for feedback:
* Reconciliation report modified header
24 matches
Mail list logo
