On 29/01/2019 18:12, stephen.m.butler51 wrote:
My first problem is figuring why my compile script stopped working. I was out
most of yesterday and out most of today.
Yes, the first round didn't show any anomalies.
Why the Trump do you think anyone is interested in your day to day
movements
On 01/02/2019 16:05, David Carlson wrote:
Wm,
you are at it again. We need to help your tiny brain.
Liz! Help! the bad people are talking amongst themselves!
FFS, grow up dullard.
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
Most of these issues are not caused by reports but rather webkit/UI
issues :) I haven't found way to trigger report drill-down without an
intermediate "Load" anchor.
Hopefully you can request an enhancement from them.
It's an internal webkit issue and too difficult to fix. I think the
On 31/01/2019 01:56, Stephen M. Butler wrote:
Took me awhile to figure out how to drill down.
Ummm, you appear to be less capable than the people trying to help you.
To me this is a Trump supporter so obviously.
If you follow the conversation, the idiot is Stephen, everyone is trying
too
On 27/01/2019 22:22, Stephen M. Butler wrote:
But, you didn't ask me for that! What, in particular, would you like me
to review?
you are giving way to much personal information
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
Also latest developments will modify budget bar chart to specify budget
periods rather than absolute dates, similar to budget.scm :-)
On Thu., 31 Jan. 2019, 22:05 Christopher Lam Thanks for feedback.
>
> Most of these issues are not caused by reports but rather webkit/UI issues
> :) I haven't
Thanks for feedback.
Most of these issues are not caused by reports but rather webkit/UI issues
:) I haven't found way to trigger report drill-down without an intermediate
"Load" anchor.
Try refreshing my branch. Latest developments: the yAxis amounts are now
formatted correctly according to
Took me awhile to figure out how to drill down. Double clicking didn't
do it. I finally noticed the small print in the upper left corner that
I eventually determined said "load". Clicking that took me to the child
accounts of the one originally clicked. However, there was no "unload"
to go
Hello
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 09:31, Stephen M. Butler wrote:
> So far, my only negative is with the Average balance chart. It's too
> tall and I lose the captions at the bottom (I maybe see 1 or 2 pixels of
> them). When I scroll down then I lose the chart title at the top. I am
> running
Did some more poking around (chris/...--> gnucash 3.4-66). All looks
very good. I clicked on some of the pretty colors and the behavior
didn't "select" the color like main 3.4-50 does. It seemed rather odd
that the "old" version selected to area since there wasn't anything I
could figure out to
:45 (GMT-08:00) To: Cc:
gnucash-devel Subject: Re: [GNC-dev] Pie Chart
p.s. from your screenshots, it would seem that the charts are working well.
Hint: new features added, and old features resurrected:
- clicky links from pie/line/bar graphs to drill down into
sub-charts,sub-reports
p.s. from your screenshots, it would seem that the charts are working well.
Hint: new features added, and old features resurrected:
- clicky links from pie/line/bar graphs to drill down into
sub-charts,sub-reports, or register (this was disabled >10yrs ago?)
- fixed formatting amounts/axes,
You could try creating a local build via ninja (documented in wiki). Thanks
for beta testing.
On Mon., 28 Jan. 2019, 06:43 Stephen M. Butler Oh.
>
> Confession. I don't look at pie, bar, graph, etc charts. So, I'd need
> both versions installed and switch back and forth.
>
> How do I get both
Oh.
Confession. I don't look at pie, bar, graph, etc charts. So, I'd need
both versions installed and switch back and forth.
How do I get both versions available? Without uninstalling one and
installing the other every time I wanted to compare the results!
I might be the wrong guy for
Erm.
None of these...
All feedback below relates to UI / styling.
Mainly need beta-testing the new charting infrastructure, upgraded from
jqplot to chartJS. Is there any noticeable change? Any bugs? Notice
interactivity -- try clicking on chart, and compare behaviour with
previous
15 matches
Mail list logo
