Re: [GNC-dev] v5 breaks multicol reports, why didn't someone check this behavior?

Wm, The problem arises because you opened your original post with this: "The problem is the fuckwit in charge there doesn't allow reports from people that don't suck his penis." Just point out the problem with the program - we neither want, need or care for your personal vitriol and feelings

Re: [GNC-dev] v5 breaks multicol reports, why didn't someone check this behavior?

Since I know as fact that v5 is making a mistake WHY THE FUCK is this nagging incorrect message allowed into the group? FFS when *I* point out a mistake *I* get complaints, jeez :( Have some decency and honesty folks ! Wm ... On 2023-05-09 15:42, Mark wrote: May 9, 2023 07:50:26 Wm : Wm

Re: [GNC-dev] v5 breaks multicol reports, why didn't someone check this behavior?

In case you are unusually stupid, try the recipe before replying you fool. Wm ... On 2023-05-09 15:42, Mark wrote: May 9, 2023 07:50:26 Wm : Wm ... I understand that you're frustrated when you encounter bugs, but please remember, Gnucash is developed by volunteers. They are developing

Re: [GNC-dev] v5 breaks multicol reports, why didn't someone check this behavior?

On 2023-05-09 05:50, Wm wrote: …The problem is the … in charge there doesn't allow reports from people that don't …. [Unacceptable obscene language elided.] …These are both *human* issues. Wm, your language in these posts is obscene, insulting, and not appropriate for this email list.

Re: [GNC-dev] v5 breaks multicol reports, why didn't someone check this behavior?

May 9, 2023 07:50:26 Wm : > Wm ... I understand that you're frustrated when you encounter bugs, but please remember, Gnucash is developed by volunteers. They are developing software and fixing bugs because they enjoy it, they are not, as far as I know, under any contractual obligation to

[GNC-dev] v5 breaks multicol reports, why didn't someone check this behavior?

In case you think this belongs in 798809 – Multicolumn report error when reopened after saving. (gnucash.org) I agree, it does belong there. The problem is the fuckwit in charge there doesn't allow reports from people that don't suck his