Re: GnuCash Draft Concept Guide, or, Whose WIki Is This, Anyway?

Frank, "Frank H. Ellenberger" writes: > I asked you for your search patterns, which resulted in that pages and > was still waiting for a response. I thought he was talking about the Wiki Search, not Google Search. Mediawiki has its own search capabilities

Re: GnuCash Draft Concept Guide, or, Whose WIki Is This, Anyway?

Frank, Thank you for your reply. I will start with an overall observation: I think that you and I see the GnuCash documentation realm in fundamentally different ways. I believe that the wiki and what I will refer to as the official documentation (defined as the Tutorial & Concepts Guide and

Fwd: Re: GnuCash Draft Concept Guide, or, Whose WIki Is This, Anyway?

"cc: gnucash-de...@lists.gnucash.org" failed Weitergeleitete Nachricht Betreff: Re: GnuCash Draft Concept Guide, or, Whose WIki Is This, Anyway? Datum: Sat, 2 Dec 2017 21:26:07 +0100 Von: Frank H. Ellenberger <frank.h.ellenber...@gmail.com> An: David Thomas <

Re: GnuCash Draft Concept Guide, or, Whose WIki Is This, Anyway?

Hi, Am 01.12.2017 um 04:55 schrieb David Thomas: > Frank, > > I am struggling right now to find the right way to bring up the issue of the > Gnucash Draft Concept Guide, which still resides on the wiki. > > As you know, I have proposed on numerous occasions (most recently, two and a > half

Re: GnuCash Draft Concept Guide, or, Whose WIki Is This, Anyway?

Dear all, last time this issue was discussed, the majority of replies agreed to have those pages removed and that's it. Hence, I now put this into action and deleted those pages from the wiki. Thanks a lot! Regards, Christian Am Freitag, 1. Dezember 2017, 16:22:19 schrieb Geert Janssens: >

Re: gnucash.org vs. lists.gnucash.org [was: GnuCash Draft Concept Guide, or, Whose WIki Is This, Anyway?]

> On Dec 1, 2017, at 8:25 AM, D via gnucash-devel > wrote: > > Certainly. I've just used what my mail program puts in. > > On December 1, 2017, at 8:31 PM, Geert Janssens > wrote: > > Oh, David, > > Completely unrelated to this

Re: GnuCash Draft Concept Guide, or, Whose WIki Is This, Anyway?

Certainly. I've just used what my mail program puts in. On December 1, 2017, at 8:31 PM, Geert Janssens wrote: Oh, David, Completely unrelated to this discussion... Can you use gnucash- de...@gnucash.org in the future as mail address for the list rather than

Re: GnuCash Draft Concept Guide, or, Whose WIki Is This, Anyway?

Oh, David, Completely unrelated to this discussion... Can you use gnucash- de...@gnucash.org in the future as mail address for the list rather than gnucash-de...@lists.gnucash.org ? While both work the one without "list" in the domain is the one the list manager itself promotes. When I do a

Re: GnuCash Draft Concept Guide, or, Whose WIki Is This, Anyway?

David, I agree this wasn't handled as it should have been. My apologies for that even though I'm not directly responsible for it. I was and still am in favor of removing these pages and I appreciate the creative solution you applied as a compromise. I don't know why Frank decided to revert

Re: GnuCash Draft Concept Guide, or, Whose WIki Is This, Anyway?

David, I recall replying to such a thread and being in agreement. Perhaps there was more than one. I see no reason to keep out of date pages on a wiki. The entire purpose of a wiki is to be able to keep it up to date and to have multiple editors. If a static info section is desired, then a

GnuCash Draft Concept Guide, or, Whose WIki Is This, Anyway?

Frank, I am struggling right now to find the right way to bring up the issue of the Gnucash Draft Concept Guide, which still resides on the wiki. As you know, I have proposed on numerous occasions (most recently, two and a half weeks ago) to have these pages removed from the wiki, since they