Re: [GNC-dev] GTK3 Mnemonics

2018-10-20 Thread John Ralls
> On Oct 20, 2018, at 5:01 AM, Frank H. Ellenberger > wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > Am 20.10.18 um 08:30 schrieb Chris Good: >> Hi Frank, >> >> In your edit of the gtk3 wiki [1], you added in part: >> >> === Circumvent Bad GTK3 Design d

Re: [GNC-dev] GTK3 Mnemonics

2018-10-20 Thread Frank H. Ellenberger
Hi Chris, Am 20.10.18 um 08:30 schrieb Chris Good: > Hi Frank, > > In your edit of the gtk3 wiki [1], you added in part: > > === Circumvent Bad GTK3 Design decisions === >   Get Visible Mnenomics Back > Since GTK3.10 the underlines of the mnenomics are only visibl

[GNC-dev] GTK3 Mnemonics

2018-10-20 Thread Chris Good
Hi Frank, In your edit of the gtk3 wiki [1], you added in part: === Circumvent Bad GTK3 Design decisions ===   Get Visible Mnenomics Back Since GTK3.10 the underlines of the mnenomics are only visible after you hovered the mouse over the element ''and'' pressed alt. In $SCOPE/gtk-3.0

Re: [GNC-dev] Ubuntu 16.04 compile: libgwengui-gtk3-0

2018-07-07 Thread Descending Nerdliness
Thanks David. Thanks John. On 07/07/2018 03:25 PM, John Ralls wrote: > >> On Jul 7, 2018, at 2:17 PM, Descending Nerdliness >> wrote: >> >> Greetings: >> >> Compiling GC 3.2 seems to require libgwengui-gtk3-0, but that is not in >> the ubuntu 1

Re: [GNC-dev] Ubuntu 16.04 compile: libgwengui-gtk3-0

2018-07-07 Thread John Ralls
> On Jul 7, 2018, at 2:17 PM, Descending Nerdliness > wrote: > > Greetings: > > Compiling GC 3.2 seems to require libgwengui-gtk3-0, but that is not in > the ubuntu 16.04 repository. When I tried to add a later version from > debian, I ended up having to up

Re: [GNC-dev] Ubuntu 16.04 compile: libgwengui-gtk3-0

2018-07-07 Thread David Carlson
, Jul 7, 2018, 4:18 PM Descending Nerdliness < hisdescendingnerdlin...@rattleit.com> wrote: > Greetings: > > Compiling GC 3.2 seems to require libgwengui-gtk3-0, but that is not in > the ubuntu 16.04 repository. When I tried to add a later version from > debian, I ended up

[GNC-dev] Ubuntu 16.04 compile: libgwengui-gtk3-0

2018-07-07 Thread Descending Nerdliness
Greetings: Compiling GC 3.2 seems to require libgwengui-gtk3-0, but that is not in the ubuntu 16.04 repository.  When I tried to add a later version from debian, I ended up having to upgrade all things related to aqbanking, which eventually killed other things. I have eliminated aqbanking to get

[GNC-dev] Ubuntu 16.04 compile: libgwengui-gtk3-0

2018-07-07 Thread Descending Nerdliness
Greetings: Compiling GC 3.2 seems to require libgwengui-gtk3-0, but that is not in the ubuntu 16.04 repository.  When I tried to add a later version from debian, I ended up having to upgrade all things related to aqbanking, which eventually killed other things. I have eliminated aqbanking to get

Re: [GNC-dev] Captcha; was: GTK3 CSS Active Row

2018-04-13 Thread Alen Siljak
t;warl...@mit.edu> > Subject: [GNC-dev] Captcha; was: GTK3 CSS Active Row > > The Captcha should now be fiexed. can you test it? ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

[GNC-dev] Captcha; was: GTK3 CSS Active Row

2018-04-12 Thread Frank H. Ellenberger
Am 12.04.2018 um 12:19 schrieb cicko: > As it often happens, the solution was quick to find only after the question > was posted. > This works well: > > *.register-cursor { > color: blanchedalmond; > } > > Here is a gist that adjusts this for a dark theme (still can't add new urls > to the

Re: [GNC-dev] GTK3 CSS Active Row

2018-04-12 Thread cicko
As it often happens, the solution was quick to find only after the question was posted. This works well: *.register-cursor { color: blanchedalmond; } Here is a gist that adjusts this for a dark theme (still can't add new urls to the wiki):

[GNC-dev] GTK3 CSS Active Row

2018-04-12 Thread cicko
A quick question in relation to GTK3 customization (https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/GTK3). I've applied an existing dark theme and that covers general GTK elements. One issue I have now is that the selected/active register row keeps the dark text but gets the dark background from the theme. Does

GTK3 page and Wiki general; was: Feedback about 2.7.8

2018-03-31 Thread Frank H. Ellenberger
Hi, Am 31.03.2018 um 13:51 schrieb Geert Janssens: > I'm fine with moving the FAQ material here, but I would prefer to keep a link > from the faq to this page so users can be redirected. IMHO we should move most content from the FAQ to structured pages of the respective themes (and after some

Gtk3 Theming Tool for Windows

2017-12-30 Thread John Ralls
GnuCash has had since time immemorial a Select GnuCash Theme tool in the Windows Start menu. In reality it's just a wrapper around gtk2_prefs [1] and that hasn't been updated in almost 5 years--and never for Gtk3. So I've removed the Select GnuCash Theme tool from the Windows build of 2.7.3

Re: Gtk3 Registry fields

2017-09-05 Thread Geert Janssens
On dinsdag 5 september 2017 18:49:22 CEST Robert Fewell wrote: > I would like to confirm the behaviour of the new registry so that I can fix > which ever way is correct, hopefully I can explain what I am seeing... > > If you mouse click on a field, say description, the text highlights and you >

Re: Gtk3 Registry fields

2017-09-05 Thread Sumit Bhardwaj
Yes, please. This is different from GTK2 and disconcerting. Thanks, Bob, for all the work so far for GTK3. So far, it's been a charm. On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Robert Fewell <14ubo...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would like to confirm the behaviour of the new registry so that I can fi

Gtk3 Registry fields

2017-09-05 Thread Robert Fewell
I would like to confirm the behaviour of the new registry so that I can fix which ever way is correct, hopefully I can explain what I am seeing... If you mouse click on a field, say description, the text highlights and you are able to amend but you have no cursor. If you mouse click again, the

Re: Gtk3 master

2017-08-31 Thread Geert Janssens
On donderdag 31 augustus 2017 19:17:02 CEST John Ralls wrote: > > On Aug 31, 2017, at 9:11 AM, Geert Janssens > > wrote:> > > On donderdag 31 augustus 2017 16:17:20 CEST Aaron Laws wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Geert Janssens > >>

Re: Gtk3 master

2017-08-31 Thread John Ralls
> On Aug 31, 2017, at 9:11 AM, Geert Janssens > wrote: > > On donderdag 31 augustus 2017 16:17:20 CEST Aaron Laws wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Geert Janssens >> wrote: >>> I meant to add still, if we want to keep guile 1.8

Re: Gtk3 master

2017-08-31 Thread Geert Janssens
On donderdag 31 augustus 2017 16:17:20 CEST Aaron Laws wrote: > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Geert Janssens > wrote: > > I meant to add still, if we want to keep guile 1.8 support, the > > FIND_PACKAGE(GUILE_EXECUTABLE...) rules should move up inside the > >

Re: Gtk3 master

2017-08-31 Thread Geert Janssens
On donderdag 31 augustus 2017 17:01:10 CEST Robert Fewell wrote: > Copied your changes locally and was able to build OK. > Bob > > On 31 August 2017 at 15:17, Geert Janssens > > wrote: > > On donderdag 31 augustus 2017 16:01:19 CEST Robert Fewell wrote: > > > It

Re: Gtk3 master

2017-08-31 Thread Robert Fewell
Copied your changes locally and was able to build OK. Bob On 31 August 2017 at 15:17, Geert Janssens wrote: > On donderdag 31 augustus 2017 16:01:19 CEST Robert Fewell wrote: > > It builds with "guile2.0" removed on that line, also output of which > guile > > is

Re: Gtk3 master

2017-08-31 Thread Geert Janssens
On donderdag 31 augustus 2017 16:01:19 CEST Robert Fewell wrote: > It builds with "guile2.0" removed on that line, also output of which guile > is /usr/bin/guile and that version is 1.8.8. I do not have version 2 > installed. > Bob > Thanks for detailing this. It turns out the FIND_PROGRAM

Re: Gtk3 master

2017-08-31 Thread Aaron Laws
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: > I meant to add still, if we want to keep guile 1.8 support, the > FIND_PACKAGE(GUILE_EXECUTABLE...) rules should move up inside the > branches of > the GUILE2 vs GUILE1 test. > For GUILE2 it can remain >

Re: Gtk3 master

2017-08-31 Thread Robert Fewell
It builds with "guile2.0" removed on that line, also output of which guile is /usr/bin/guile and that version is 1.8.8. I do not have version 2 installed. Bob On 31 August 2017 at 13:44, Aaron Laws wrote: > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Robert Fewell <14ubo...@gmail.com>

Re: Gtk3 master

2017-08-31 Thread Geert Janssens
On donderdag 31 augustus 2017 14:28:33 CEST Robert Fewell wrote: > Just tried to build from master after all the recent changes and it failed > on guile, currently I am running 1.8 and in the log file I see "Using > guile-1.8.x" but it then logs "The guile executable was not found, but is >

Re: Gtk3 master

2017-08-31 Thread Geert Janssens
On donderdag 31 augustus 2017 14:28:33 CEST Robert Fewell wrote: > Just tried to build from master after all the recent changes and it failed > on guile, currently I am running 1.8 and in the log file I see "Using > guile-1.8.x" but it then logs "The guile executable was not found, but is >

Re: Gtk3 master

2017-08-31 Thread Aaron Laws
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Aaron Laws wrote: > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Robert Fewell <14ubo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Just tried to build from master after all the recent changes and it failed >> on guile, currently I am running 1.8 and in the log file I see

Re: Gtk3 master

2017-08-31 Thread Aaron Laws
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Robert Fewell <14ubo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just tried to build from master after all the recent changes and it failed > on guile, currently I am running 1.8 and in the log file I see "Using > guile-1.8.x" but it then logs "The guile executable was not found, but

Gtk3 master

2017-08-31 Thread Robert Fewell
Just tried to build from master after all the recent changes and it failed on guile, currently I am running 1.8 and in the log file I see "Using guile-1.8.x" but it then logs "The guile executable was not found, but is required. Please set GUILE_EXECUTABLE." Looking at CMakeLists.txt, I can build

Re: Python bindings and Gtk3

2017-08-10 Thread Mike Alexander
> On Aug 10, 2017, at 3:22 AM, John Ralls wrote: > > 3.22.what? I pushed the change to gtk that caused the pango breakage between > 3.22.11 and 3.22.12 so 3.22.11 wouldn't have had the problem... and of course > if pango is using the fontconfig backend it

Re: Python bindings and Gtk3

2017-08-10 Thread John Ralls
t; It’s version 3.22. > >> Hmm, looks like both whitespace and font are larger. What version of Gtk+-3? >> >> You can try fiddling with the tab-label styling in >> ~/.config/gtk-3.0/gtk.css. There's some guidance in >> https://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/unstable/the

Re: Python bindings and Gtk3

2017-08-09 Thread Mike Alexander
> You can try fiddling with the tab-label styling in ~/.config/gtk-3.0/gtk.css. > There's some guidance in > https://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/unstable/theming.html > <https://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/unstable/theming.html>. I’ll take a look at that. Mike _

Re: Python bindings and Gtk3

2017-08-09 Thread John Ralls
r. I see that Pango’s configure looks for (and finds) >> fontconfig, but then says "checking which cairo font backends could be >> used... quartz freetype”. I suspect it is using fontconfig. I am using a >> Retina display, but the text in the tabs seems like it’s normal s

Re: Python bindings and Gtk3

2017-08-09 Thread Derek Atkins
Mike, Mike Alexander writes: > I guess attachments aren’t allowed, I should have known. The > screenshots are at *attachments* are allowed *INLINE* images are not. -derek -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student

Re: Python bindings and Gtk3

2017-08-08 Thread Mike Alexander
ing a > Retina display, but the text in the tabs seems like it’s normal size. There > is a lot of blank space around the text that makes the tab bigger. In fact > the text itself is smaller in the Gtk3 version. Here are a couple of > screenshots. I guess attachments aren’t allow

Re: Python bindings and Gtk3

2017-08-08 Thread Mike Alexander
at makes the tab bigger. In fact the text itself is smaller in the Gtk3 version. Here are a couple of screenshots. ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Re: Python bindings and Gtk3

2017-08-08 Thread John Ralls
d and have tabs on right-hand side as well, but it's >> perfectly usable. >> > > It’s certainly usable, I didn’t mean to imply otherwise. It’s just that I > have to scroll to see all my tabs where I don’t in the old version. It’s a > minor annoyance that should be easil

Re: Python bindings and Gtk3

2017-08-08 Thread Geert Janssens
ht-hand side as well, but it's > > perfectly usable. > It’s certainly usable, I didn’t mean to imply otherwise. It’s just that I > have to scroll to see all my tabs where I don’t in the old version. It’s a > minor annoyance that should be easily dealt with. I should probab

Re: Python bindings and Gtk3

2017-08-07 Thread Mike Alexander
ly usable, I didn’t mean to imply otherwise. It’s just that I have to scroll to see all my tabs where I don’t in the old version. It’s a minor annoyance that should be easily dealt with. I should probably learn enough about Gtk3 to fix it myself, but if I start playing around with that I won’t get an

Re: Python bindings and Gtk3

2017-08-07 Thread Sumit Bhardwaj
Agree with Mike. GTK3 changes are looking fine. So far, only minor issues. For the tab issue, can you share a screenshot or something to that effect? I am on master build and have tabs on right-hand side as well, but it's perfectly usable. -Sumit On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Mike Alexander

Python bindings and Gtk3

2017-08-07 Thread Mike Alexander
You may already know this, but the Python bindings done’t work in the current master branch (they still use Gtk2). I made a brief attempt to fix this, but I don’t know either Python or Gtk3 well enough. I also noticed a cosmetic issue that you may not be aware of because I use a non-default

Re: Gtk3

2017-08-01 Thread Robert Fewell
I had come across those resource files but was not sure how to implement so stuck to what I could figure out and it also allowed me to change the css file without having to rebuild as I understood it. I have also created a pull request for the register changes / fixes that I had done without any

Re: Gnucash and css (was: Gtk3)

2017-08-01 Thread John Ralls
> On Jul 31, 2017, at 11:02 PM, Geert Janssens <geert.gnuc...@kobaltwit.be> > wrote: > > Bob, > > As hinted in my previous message in the Gtk3 thread, I'd like to zoom in a > bit > on using Css for gnucash. > > Let me start with a basic context for this d

Gnucash and css (was: Gtk3)

2017-07-31 Thread Geert Janssens
Bob, As hinted in my previous message in the Gtk3 thread, I'd like to zoom in a bit on using Css for gnucash. Let me start with a basic context for this discussion: * css in gtk (and hence gnucash) is used to define the visual representation of the graphical user interface (defined through

Re: Gtk3

2017-07-31 Thread Geert Janssens
On vrijdag 28 juli 2017 18:07:41 CEST Robert Fewell wrote: > All, just for information I have been tinkering in the register code, > mainly on the appearance, hopefully have some thing to pull after the > weekend. > What I have done so far is get the header alignment working, added a css > class

Re: Gtk3

2017-07-28 Thread Robert Fewell
..@kobaltwit.be> > wrote: > >> Bob, >> >> I noticed today there are still some differences in keyboard navigation >> between gnucash before I merged your gtk3 work and the current state. In >> particular I see File->Close and File->Quit have lost their accele

Re: Gtk3

2017-07-15 Thread Robert Fewell
These have been fixed in latest pull request. Bob On 12 July 2017 at 21:32, Geert Janssens <geert.gnuc...@kobaltwit.be> wrote: > Bob, > > I noticed today there are still some differences in keyboard navigation > between gnucash before I merged your gtk3 work and

Re: Gtk3

2017-07-12 Thread Geert Janssens
Bob, I noticed today there are still some differences in keyboard navigation between gnucash before I merged your gtk3 work and the current state. In particular I see File->Close and File->Quit have lost their accelerators. Perhaps there are others still. Regards,

Re: Gtk3

2017-07-09 Thread Geert Janssens
, migrate > the dialog-import.glade to gtk3 again which stops a crash if you go to > preferences and a the some miss added style context classes. > > I will try and look at the other points raised this week. > > Bob Thanks Bob. Everything is pushed to master. As said on the PR I worked

Re: Gtk3

2017-07-09 Thread Robert Fewell
I have just issued a pull request for the changes that I made after Geert had copied my branch and most of the changes he pointed out on his review. The main ones being the missed alt key combination on some buttons, migrate the dialog-import.glade to gtk3 again which stops a crash if you go

Re: Gtk3

2017-07-08 Thread Robert Fewell
e set in your code, something like > this > > #DensCalX > > { > > font-size: 10pt; > > } > > > > That's only highlevel code, not fully verified :) More details > explanations and examples can be found here: > > https://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/unsta

Re: Gtk3

2017-07-08 Thread Robert Fewell
e > conflicts. > I then pushed this result back to my github repo (gjanssens). So the master > branch in that repo is now running gtk3. > > Note that this branch currently doesn't install if you enable building with > aqbanking. This is also the case for our central master branch th

Re: Gtk3

2017-07-08 Thread John Ralls
Geert, Great, thanks! That was what I was planning to do today, so it moves me up to merging in my mingw64 branch and converting the mingw64 branch of gnucash-on-windows to Gtk3. That blocks windows nightlies so I had it in mind that we’d hold off on merging into the official master until

Re: Gtk3

2017-07-08 Thread Geert Janssens
-size: 10pt; } That's only highlevel code, not fully verified :) More details explanations and examples can be found here: https://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/unstable/chap-css-overview.html For default gtk widgets this is all available by default. And usually we'd want to use the second form (a

Re: Gtk3

2017-07-08 Thread Geert Janssens
, after resolving the conflicts. I then pushed this result back to my github repo (gjanssens). So the master branch in that repo is now running gtk3. Note that this branch currently doesn't install if you enable building with aqbanking. This is also the case for our central master branch though

Re: Gtk3

2017-07-08 Thread Robert Fewell
The file name can be as you stated, I was thinking about the widget style contexts, maybe along the lines of GncDenseCal_font_size Bob On 8 July 2017 at 14:39, Geert Janssens wrote: > On zaterdag 8 juli 2017 15:17:45 CEST Robert Fewell wrote: > > Geert, > > > > That

Re: Gtk3

2017-07-08 Thread Robert Fewell
> github commits. > > In general - well done! This really brings us much closer to a real gtk3 > gnucash. > > As far as I'm concerned your branch is ready for merging: > - the tree builds fine > - the build executable seems to work barring a few visual details > > So IMO

Re: Gtk3

2017-07-08 Thread Geert Janssens
I'm done with reviewing your work. You'll find mi comments directly on the github commits. In general - well done! This really brings us much closer to a real gtk3 gnucash. As far as I'm concerned your branch is ready for merging: - the tree builds fine - the build executable seems to work

Re: Gtk3

2017-07-08 Thread Geert Janssens
On zaterdag 8 juli 2017 15:17:45 CEST Robert Fewell wrote: > Geert, > > That sounds like a good idea, not sure about the location, may be in > share/gnucash/gnucash.css Doh... Indeed share/gnucash/ would be much better than /etc. It's application data, not system configuration. > Some kind of

Re: Gtk3

2017-07-08 Thread Robert Fewell
> > be made. > > > > I have tried to stay away from the register but some of the commits have > > replaced some deprecated widgets. > > > > I have experimented with some CSS by adding style context classes of the > > nature "GncImapDialog" to various

Re: Gtk3

2017-07-08 Thread Geert Janssens
various dialogues and this seems to work quite > well down to changing the background colour of different tree views. May > continue to add more. > > There are no doubt some tweaks to be made to align with current version but > maybe that should wait till the gtk3 branch is updated fr

Re: Gtk3

2017-06-29 Thread John Ralls
ore. > > There are no doubt some tweaks to be made to align with current version but > maybe that should wait till the gtk3 branch is updated from master. > > With version 3.22, I am getting warnings on the console about transient > windows not having a parent so may have

Re: Gtk3

2017-06-29 Thread Robert Fewell
of the nature "GncImapDialog" to various dialogues and this seems to work quite well down to changing the background colour of different tree views. May continue to add more. There are no doubt some tweaks to be made to align with current version but maybe that should wait till the g

Re: Gtk3

2017-06-16 Thread John Ralls
Bob, Super! Thanks! The treatment of stock images was something of a moving target in Gtk3 so you may have to do some config/cmake work to figure out what to use and then conditionally compile based the result. We do need to look good on 3.10-3.22 and everything in between. I think complaints

Re: Gtk3

2017-06-16 Thread Robert Fewell
. In the original VM I have built and made some changes which can be seen at My GitHub <https://github.com/Bob-IT/gnucash/tree/gtk3> I have hopefully done the following but as normal there may be some tweaks... Replaced RC file with CSS file, name may need changing The dense calendar now r

Re: Gtk3

2017-06-06 Thread Geert Janssens
On maandag 5 juni 2017 12:19:24 CEST Robert Fewell wrote: > Hi, > > I was browsing the IRC logs and Geert mentioned his gtk3 branch, yes I have > pulled from there and recently updated my local version which was built > successfully. > I tend not to fiddle where other peopl

Re: Gtk3

2017-06-05 Thread John Ralls
> On Jun 5, 2017, at 3:19 AM, Robert Fewell <14ubo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I was browsing the IRC logs and Geert mentioned his gtk3 branch, yes I have > pulled from there and recently updated my local version which was built > successfully. > I tend no

Re: gtk3 + webkit

2017-02-02 Thread Bill Nottingham
John Ralls (jra...@ceridwen.us) said: > Geert noted in IRC that > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375812 indicates that we need > to lose the dependency on WebKit1 ASAP, as Fedora intends to drop it from > distribution in F27. As Geert notes, WebKit2 is Gtk3-only.

Re: gtk3 + webkit

2017-02-02 Thread John Ralls
; > As you have done a big chunk of the work we may as well evaluate this avenue > anyway, perhaps only as a short term interim solution. > > I'll look at it when I'm ready to take on the Gtk3 work. Note that I have my > own local gtk3 branch with several patches to migrate parts ov

Re: gtk3 + webkit

2017-02-02 Thread Geert Janssens
. I'll look at it when I'm ready to take on the Gtk3 work. Note that I have my own local gtk3 branch with several patches to migrate parts over that couldn't be migrated as long as we also supported gtk2. I had forgotten to consider our external dependencies. Glad you bring that up. * LibOFX

gtk3 + webkit

2017-02-02 Thread Robert Fewell
Hi, I was looking at the irc logs and see that gtk3 / webkit upgrade was mentioned and that there were two options mentioned, one was change to some thing like goo-canvas, the other was to complete register2 which I started awhile back and failed to complete. There is an other option that I came

Re: gtk3 and gnucash

2015-02-20 Thread Sriram Ramkrishna
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Geert Janssens geert.gnuc...@kobaltwit.be wrote: That's not completely correct. I intended to investigate MingW64/Msys2 but due to lack of time I never got further than superficially looking into it. I hoped to continue this at a later time, which so far hasn't

Re: gtk3 and gnucash

2015-02-19 Thread Sriram Ramkrishna
was wondering if you were aware of the recent win32 improvements that have been made in win32 space? Paolo and others have done a lot of work in this space. We would of course love to see a gtk3 port of GNUCash which the GNOME Foundation uses to manage its finances as I'm sure a lot of other

Re: gtk3 and gnucash

2015-02-19 Thread Paolo Borelli
to support that there are any. The latest binaries on www.gtk.org are 3.6, which Tarnyko did 2 years ago. There aren't any gtk3 binaries at all on master.gnome.org, only gtk2 ones from 4 years ago. I see a whopping 8 commits this year in gdk/win32. I agree that it is unfortunate that we do

Re: gtk3 and gnucash

2015-02-19 Thread Geert Janssens
state of gtk on Windows. On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:59 AM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote: As for win32 improvements, no, I haven't seen anything to support that there are any. The latest binaries on www.gtk.org are 3.6, which Tarnyko did 2 years ago. There aren't any gtk3 binaries

Re: gtk3 and gnucash

2015-02-18 Thread John Ralls
that have been made in win32 space? Paolo and others have done a lot of work in this space. We would of course love to see a gtk3 port of GNUCash which the GNOME Foundation uses to manage its finances as I'm sure a lot of other software projects who manage money do as well. That's very unlikely

On Gtk3 (was:Re: Gnucash 2.5/6)

2013-02-12 Thread Geert Janssens
On 08-02-13 16:09, Derek Atkins wrote: Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be writes: Forgot to mention: Gtk3 was indeed not on the agenda for 2.6. 2.6 is only meant to be *ready* to be migrated. This means getting rid of all the deprecated gtk symbols. Other than the register this is done

Re: On Gtk3 (was:Re: Gnucash 2.5/6)

2013-02-12 Thread John Ralls
On Feb 12, 2013, at 2:41 AM, Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote: On 08-02-13 16:09, Derek Atkins wrote: Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be writes: Forgot to mention: Gtk3 was indeed not on the agenda for 2.6. 2.6 is only meant to be *ready* to be migrated. This means