This is a bug that's been fixed in 2.6.18
There's more than a few report writers now :)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647805
On 2 October 2017 at 05:55, Jon Schewe wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm trying to create a report with some options that are disabled when
> others
Hello,
Please help.
I downloaded transactions from my online banking using .csv format,
then imported the transactions to my GnuCash account.
I saw the transactions, but GnuCash did not perform the ongoing account
balance calculations.
Any suggestions?
Thank you,
I'm now starting to use the Budget Report and would really like one feature
(/it would have been more, but in my research I've found that you can export
your reports to HTML which addresses the majority of my printing issues/).
I'd like you be able to specify the number of reporting periods when
azalea4va,
Your report addresses many of the issues I've had as a new user of the
gnucash budget reports. However, I have not been able to successfully
install your report. I'm assuming that it will show up under Reports ->
Budget as "Budget+ Report", but I cannot see it there or anywhere else
All,
I'm trying to create a report with some options that are disabled when
others are not selected. Below are my 2 options. When I select the Memo
option I get a critical error. Does anyone know why the set_selectable
field is null? Am I missing some initialization.
CRIT
Nelson,
Just one comment from another user;
My banks do not show holds online, or if they do, it is a simple summary of
book balance vs available balance. They warn that ACH transfers these-days
often clear on the same day.
To me, it is too much effort to try to track that, and as others have
Hi Nelson,
Such is life in the real world. GnuCash is not designed for the real world,
just a simplified approximation. GnuCash reports just one main balance. You can
get more by using the reconciled, cleared, present, future minimum and total
columns in the main Accounts tab, but that is
> On Oct 1, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Nelson wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> What I am doing today is exactly you are saying. I have a "pending" account
> and I would record two transfers:
>
> - $1 bank-a -> pending
> - $1 pending -> bank-b postdated by 5 business days.
>
Hi John,
What I am doing today is exactly you are saying. I have a "pending" account
and I would record two transfers:
- $1 bank-a -> pending
- $1 pending -> bank-b postdated by 5 business days.
What bothers me with this approach is that when I go online on bank-a I see
a different
David, I am well aware that the problem I am raising is not a very common one
and want to thank you for your answer.
The thing is that I have to work with tens of accounts and each transitory
state is extremely important. Imagine that when I have a number of pulls
pending on an account becomes
Let's assume that we have two accounts, bank-a and bank-b.
- bank-a has a $11,000.00 balance
- bank-b initiates a $10,000.00 electronic funds transfer pull.
- money shows up in bank-b immediately but there is a 5 business days hold
so money is not available.
- for at least 2 business days, until
11 matches
Mail list logo