Thanks for responding. I am clear that I want to have all the entities
separate- I thought I had set them up that way, but cannot discern how to
access them individually, and that's why I think I might have missed something
in the initial set up and that they are combined.
-Original
{from gnucash-devel since this is more user stuff than dev related}
David,
After creating a budget, have you not tried the Budget Report?
That can show you actual vs. budgeted by period with variance and include
yearly totals. The report also now lets you choose what periods you want to
show
>> I addressed this in the file I provided. There is one and only one
>> correct
>> answer mathematically.
>
> Not true.Depends, for example, on how many decimal places in the
> calculations and whether only final rounding or rounding at multiple
> places during the calculations.
This was a
That is what I have done. I am testing now with only one commodity -
Associated British Food. I have the id set in the security editor as ABF.L.
I have tried setting this on the CSV file to ABF.L. I have also tried ABF.
Still get the message "Commodity From could not be recognised". I have
changed
I was specifically referring to the the CSV price import tool in Version 3.2.
I am trying to import the stock prices using this tool. Cannot get the Share
ID to be recognised whatever I do.
--
Sent from: http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/GnuCash-User-f1415819.html
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 19:37, Graham Balin wrote:
> ...
> Once I have made the error of re-sizing one of the columns -bang, I have to
> keep horizontal scrolling to see what is going on.
>
All you have to do is to set the column sizes (apart from description) as
you want then double click the
Nope, that “feature” is still intact. The Tutorial & Concepts Guide notes this
behavior at 2.3.3.
To date, no developer has felt the need to change the behavior of the
Description column, as idiosyncratic as it may be. Personally, I’d welcome a
change to make this column behave as most users
Just to be clear, I did test the Action field both with and without the “Use
Split Action field for number” setting. Neither case resulted in clearing the
reconcile flag. This was tested on 3.2 on MacOS High Sierra.
In both cases, trying to change the NUM field DID clear the fire the warning
> On Aug 13, 2018, at 11:20 AM, mike wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have recently upgraded from Fedora 25 to Fedora 28 and that
> has upgraded gnucash to 3.2. Build ID: 3.2+ (2018-06-24)
>
> Everything worked OK on Fedora 25 - sorry I don't know what
> version on gnucash that was.
>
>
Hello everyone,
GnuCash, via GTK, has a very rich ability to change the fonts and colors
and customize how GnuCash looks. However, I think it's safe to say that
it's not a trivial exercise for the average user.
However, the recent discussions between Adrien, GTI, Peter, and others have
made a
Dale
Watch that other thread about release 3.2 possibly different from 2.6.x.
So far I have not seen any comments about whether editing the action field
does or does not unreconcile a particular split line.
David C
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018, 1:03 PM Adrien Monteleone <
Hi all,
Recent convert from Quicken and pleased overall...BUT...
version 2.6.12 on a windows machine and 24" monitor-fine; on a HP
laptop...almost unusable due to description column auto-widening to screen
width.
I have tried trawling through the many posts, dating back 8 years!, and
cannot
While I certainly understand the concern that editing a transaction
dereconciles it, there are a couple of points I'd raise.
First, if you are editing a reconciled transaction, you are probably pretty
aware of it (and the dialog message Gnucash puts up should make it obvious).
Second, editing
There is a warning. You get to continue to edit the transaction and thus clear
the flag, or cancel and don’t edit the transaction. There is not an option to
both edit and not clear the flag.
Note, the flag only clears for amounts, accounts, NUM, and I suspect dates, but
I didn’t test that last
On 08/13/2018 08:28 AM, Adrien Monteleone wrote:
> The learning curve is infinite, it just flattens out with occasional small
> bumps.
>
> Before proceeding any further - talk to a local CPA about your specific
> situation.
And chat with your attorney about how much asset protection you need
On 08/13/2018 05:52 AM, patrushkha via gnucash-user wrote:
> I just started using Gnucash and thought I'd gotten through the learning
> curve; I have 2 small businesses and entered both of them as well as my
> personal data, but discovered they are all mixed together. At least I think
> so, I'm
Gnucash 3.2 on MacBook Pro running 10.13.6 High Sierra.
I have not seen any other comments in the mailing list but I have a variable
and occasionally annoying displacement between the mouse icon on the screen and
the actual position of the cursor on the screen.
For example, in ledgers, I have
So... question:
If one edits the transaction by changing an account, should that
un-reconcile it?
Say I make a credit card donation to a business and charge the expense
to home repairs. Then I go back and change it from home repairs to
charitable donation. Should that un-reconcile it?
Thanks so much for the work-arounds. I'll investigate tomorrow.
-Original Message-
From: gnucash-user
On Behalf Of
Adrien Monteleone
Sent: 13 August 2018 15:56
To: gnucash-user
Subject: Re: [GNC] Reconciliation being undone without warning
As a work around, how long is the time lag
As a work around, how long is the time lag between when you normally reconcile
and when you find out what the voucher #s are? Would waiting until you have
them all to reconcile work? (simply marking them ‘c’ for cleared in the
interim, but not doing the final reconcile without the voucher info)
On 8/13/2018 8:52 AM, patrushkha via gnucash-user wrote:
I just started using Gnucash and thought I'd gotten through the learning curve;
I have 2 small businesses and entered both of them as well as my personal data,
but discovered they are all mixed together. At least I think so, I'm not
On 8/12/2018 12:58 PM, azalea4va wrote:
Sorry, I missed this reply. So a little late, but ...
I should perhaps have indicated that writing this sort of thing used to
be "my line of country". I have written these things.
Mike or Penny Novack-3 wrote
a) method? << by "present value" of series
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 11:05, Anthony Marrian
wrote:
> I’m 3.2
>
You replied to my post that said that it did not happen on 2.6.19 with a
post saying that it did happen for you, hence the confusion.
Colin
>
>
> *From:* Colin Law
> *Sent:* 13 August 2018 10:04
> *To:* Anthony Marrian
>
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 09:32, Anthony Marrian
wrote:
> Actually, it does. I've just done it. It's entirely reproducible. When you
> click out of the row having entered a number, the y changes to n. The only
> niggle (if you like) is that I am manipulating GnuCash via an RDP session.
> I have no
Actually, it does. I've just done it. It's entirely reproducible. When you
click out of the row having entered a number, the y changes to n. The only
niggle (if you like) is that I am manipulating GnuCash via an RDP session. I
have no idea whether that affects things.
-Original
Sorry, I missed this reply. So a little late, but ...
Mike or Penny Novack-3 wrote
> a) method? << by "present value" of series of "rents" or by "trial and
> error" >>
I am not sure what ""present value" of series of "rents"" means, but the
answer is by math. This is just a mathematical
Very pleased to see this feature in 3.2 as I have been getting problems
importing with F:Q. Unfortunately I am having a problem with getting the
tool to recognise the stock ID. I have tried the normal version eg ABF. GVC,
ITV etc and I get the reddish colour with the message Commodity From could
27 matches
Mail list logo
