Re: [GNC] List Replies

Would one solution be to put it to a vote of the subscribers? Will On 2020 Nov 20, at 11-20 18:43:52, Greg Feneis wrote: Well, I'm glad this got thoroughly discussed without folks getting thoroughly disgusted. It seems like the boilerplate that appears in every list email could, instead of

Re: [GNC] List Replies

Well, I'm glad this got thoroughly discussed without folks getting thoroughly disgusted. It seems like the boilerplate that appears in every list email could, instead of reminding members to always reply to the list, it could let people know if they need help replying to a list message privately,

Re: [GNC] List Replies

Yes, I'm well aware of what the MacOS client does as I use it daily. I don't have an *iOS* device though. And the question wasn't about the buttons' current behaviors, but rather how easy it is to send to *any* e-mail address in any part of the header, or the body of the message. (and not

Re: [GNC] List Replies

Sorry, I had that reversed clicking Reply All: puts gnucash-u...@lists.gnucash.org in the cc: field, and the sender in the To: field. On 2020 Nov 18, at 11-18 12:17:03, w...@theprescotts.com wrote: Adrien, For your reference, in the MacOS Mail.app:

Re: [GNC] List Replies

Adrien, For your reference, in the MacOS Mail.app: clicking Reply: puts the sender in the To: field clicking Reply All: puts gnucash-u...@lists.gnucash.org in the To: field, and the sender in the cc: field. Usually what I do is hit 'Reply All', delete

Re: [GNC] List Replies

I'll add Mail.app on MacOS to the list. The 'From:' header has a down arrow to the right of the address. (visible on hover) Clicking it brings up a context menu with 'New Mail' as an option. (There is also a 'Copy Address' option if one prefers) As well, any address in the body of a message

Re: [GNC] List Replies

On 11/18/20 1:38 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: Op dinsdag 17 november 2020 19:26:58 CET schreef Adrien Monteleone: Yeah, perhaps I'm not understanding something, but if the list server is configured with the list address in the reply-to header, but *does not* hide the individual's personal address

Re: [GNC] List Replies

On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:50:07AM +0100, Geert Janssens wrote: > Op dinsdag 17 november 2020 20:45:12 CET schreef Frank H. Ellenberger: > > Am 17.11.20 um 19:26 schrieb Adrien Monteleone: > > > (note, private replies to this list are discouraged, so why make it the > > > default?!) > > > > and

Re: [GNC] List Replies

Op dinsdag 17 november 2020 20:45:12 CET schreef Frank H. Ellenberger: > Am 17.11.20 um 19:26 schrieb Adrien Monteleone: > > (note, private replies to this list are discouraged, so why make it the > > default?!) > > and we will end with public visible logs of online banking sessions. :-( > Keep

Re: [GNC] List Replies

Op dinsdag 17 november 2020 19:59:01 CET schreef Robert Heller: > At Tue, 17 Nov 2020 12:26:58 -0600 adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net wrote: > > Yeah, perhaps I'm not understanding something, but if the list server is > > configured with the list address in the reply-to header, but *does not* > >

Re: [GNC] List Replies

Op dinsdag 17 november 2020 19:26:58 CET schreef Adrien Monteleone: > Yeah, perhaps I'm not understanding something, but if the list server is > configured with the list address in the reply-to header, but *does not* > hide the individual's personal address (as described by Greg) how hard > is it

Re: [GNC] List Replies

Am 17.11.20 um 19:26 schrieb Adrien Monteleone: > (note, private replies to this list are discouraged, so why make it the > default?!) and we will end with public visible logs of online banking sessions. :-( Frank ___ gnucash-user mailing list

Re: [GNC] List Replies

At Tue, 17 Nov 2020 12:26:58 -0600 adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net wrote: > > Yeah, perhaps I'm not understanding something, but if the list server is > configured with the list address in the reply-to header, but *does not* > hide the individual's personal address (as described by Greg) how

Re: [GNC] List Replies

Yeah, perhaps I'm not understanding something, but if the list server is configured with the list address in the reply-to header, but *does not* hide the individual's personal address (as described by Greg) how hard is it for someone to copy and paste that address in a new compose window in

Re: [GNC] List Replies

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 09:22:43PM -0500, Jean-David Beyer via gnucash-user wrote: > On 11/16/20 7:22 PM, Greg Feneis wrote: > > If it's been the way it is for several years, it might be time to try a > > change. Perhaps people are more email savvy these days? > > I very much doubt it. Most of

Re: [GNC] List Replies

On 11/16/20 7:22 PM, Greg Feneis wrote: If it's been the way it is for several years, it might be time to try a change. Perhaps people are more email savvy these days? I very much doubt it. Most of my e-mail friends have dropped their land-lines and use, exclusively, their cell phones. They

Re: [GNC] List Replies

Derek, it's just the default behavior. It doesn't prevent people from making private replies or make it challenging. That seems like a plausible policy from the late 90s. If it's been the way it is for several years, it might be time to try a change. Perhaps people are more email savvy these

Re: [GNC] List Replies

At Mon, 16 Nov 2020 05:33:31 -0800 Greg Feneis wrote: > > That seems like an unnecessary dichotomy. Perhaps it's a limitation of > mailman, or our ability to administer? On the other list I belong to that > server causes either reply type to default to only the list server without > obscuring

Re: [GNC] List Replies

Greg, On Mon, November 16, 2020 8:33 am, Greg Feneis wrote: > That seems like an unnecessary dichotomy. Perhaps it's a limitation of > mailman, or our ability to administer? On the other list I belong to that > server causes either reply type to default to only the list server without >

Re: [GNC] List Replies

That seems like an unnecessary dichotomy. Perhaps it's a limitation of mailman, or our ability to administer? On the other list I belong to that server causes either reply type to default to only the list server without obscuring the originator's address. Kind regards, Greg Feneis (Pixel 3)

Re: [GNC] List Replies

Greg, This topic comes up about once a year or so, usually closer to Spring as people start working on their taxes and asking for help. In short, yes, mailman COULD be set up to set the Reply-To the list. The downside of that approach is that it makes it MUCH MUCH harder (nearly impossible) to

Re: [GNC] List Replies

Yes. -- Peter West p...@pbw.id.au “Were not ten cleansed? Where are the nine?” > On 16 Nov 2020, at 11:06 pm, Greg Feneis wrote: > > Hi friends, > > A frequent encounter on this list is members replying to an email's > originator and not to the list server. > > In the grand scheme, not a big

[GNC] List Replies

Hi friends, A frequent encounter on this list is members replying to an email's originator and not to the list server. In the grand scheme, not a big deal. However, other lists I belong to don't seem to have this issue. I'm wondering if a list server setting could help. For this other list I